4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Prospective observational study on the impact of the 21-gene assay on treatment decisions and resources optimization in breast cancer patients in Lombardy: The BONDX study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Purpose

          Adjuvant treatment decisions in early breast cancer (eBC) have traditionally been driven by risk stratification based on clinical and pathological risk factors. The 21-gene Oncotype DX® assay has been validated as a predictive test for benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy (CT), hence assessing its impact in clinical decisions is of high interest. The objective of this study was to estimate the rate of adjuvant treatment decision modification impacted by the Recurrence Score® result, and the consequent budget impact.

          Methods

          The study was a multicentre, prospective, real-life experience in Lombardy (Italy) including consecutive patients with T1–T3, N0–N1a, and ER+/HER2-eBC with clinical-pathologic “intermediate risk” of relapse. The change in treatment recommendations was assessed before and after availability of Recurrence Score result. A budget model evaluated the implications of 21-gene testing in the study population.

          Results

          The overall proportion of CT recommendations was reduced from 24.6% to 15.2% after 21-gene testing, with a major impact in patients initially considered for CT plus hormone therapy (CHT). In these patients, the total budget was reduced, leading to a net saving of -€81,017. The greater the physician propensity to prescribe CHT, the higher the potential savings for the health system from sparing CT in most tested patients.

          Conclusions

          Our real-life experience suggests that all intermediate-risk ER+/HER2-eBC patients who are initially deemed candidates for CHT should be tested with the 21-gene test. The potential to spare CT in at least half of them offers relevant advantages for patients and national health services.

          Highlights

          • The 21-gene assay is validated to guide adjuvant treatment decisions in eBC.

          • We identify patients in which 21-gene testing led to best performance in CT sparing.

          • Testing this patient group obtains the best performance in cost-benefit-ratio.

          • Lombardy approves the 21-gene assay for patients at clinical intermediar risk.

          Related collections

          Most cited references14

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Gene expression and benefit of chemotherapy in women with node-negative, estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer.

          The 21-gene recurrence score (RS) assay quantifies the likelihood of distant recurrence in women with estrogen receptor-positive, lymph node-negative breast cancer treated with adjuvant tamoxifen. The relationship between the RS and chemotherapy benefit is not known. The RS was measured in tumors from the tamoxifen-treated and tamoxifen plus chemotherapy-treated patients in the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) B20 trial. Cox proportional hazards models were utilized to test for interaction between chemotherapy treatment and the RS. A total of 651 patients were assessable (227 randomly assigned to tamoxifen and 424 randomly assigned to tamoxifen plus chemotherapy). The test for interaction between chemotherapy treatment and RS was statistically significant (P = .038). Patients with high-RS (> or = 31) tumors (ie, high risk of recurrence) had a large benefit from chemotherapy (relative risk, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.13 to 0.53; absolute decrease in 10-year distant recurrence rate: mean, 27.6%; SE, 8.0%). Patients with low-RS (< 18) tumors derived minimal, if any, benefit from chemotherapy treatment (relative risk, 1.31; 95% CI, 0.46 to 3.78; absolute decrease in distant recurrence rate at 10 years: mean, -1.1%; SE, 2.2%). Patients with intermediate-RS tumors did not appear to have a large benefit, but the uncertainty in the estimate can not exclude a clinically important benefit. The RS assay not only quantifies the likelihood of breast cancer recurrence in women with node-negative, estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer, but also predicts the magnitude of chemotherapy benefit.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Prognostic and predictive value of the 21-gene recurrence score assay in postmenopausal women with node-positive, oestrogen-receptor-positive breast cancer on chemotherapy: a retrospective analysis of a randomised trial.

            The 21-gene recurrence score assay is prognostic for women with node-negative, oestrogen-receptor-positive breast cancer treated with tamoxifen. A low recurrence score predicts little benefit of chemotherapy. For node-positive breast cancer, we investigated whether the recurrence score was prognostic in women treated with tamoxifen alone and whether it identified those who might not benefit from anthracycline-based chemotherapy, despite higher risks of recurrence. The phase 3 trial SWOG-8814 for postmenopausal women with node-positive, oestrogen-receptor-positive breast cancer showed that chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and fluorouracil (CAF) before tamoxifen (CAF-T) added survival benefit to treatment with tamoxifen alone. Optional tumour banking yielded specimens for determination of recurrence score by RT-PCR. In this retrospective analysis, we assessed the effect of recurrence score on disease-free survival by treatment group (tamoxifen vs CAF-T) using Cox regression, adjusting for number of positive nodes. There were 367 specimens (40% of the 927 patients in the tamoxifen and CAF-T groups) with sufficient RNA for analysis (tamoxifen, n=148; CAF-T, n=219). The recurrence score was prognostic in the tamoxifen-alone group (p=0.006; hazard ratio [HR] 2.64, 95% CI 1.33-5.27, for a 50-point difference in recurrence score). There was no benefit of CAF in patients with a low recurrence score (score or =31; log-rank p=0.033; HR 0.59, 0.35-1.01), after adjustment for number of positive nodes. The recurrence score by treatment interaction was significant in the first 5 years (p=0.029), with no additional prediction beyond 5 years (p=0.58), although the cumulative benefit remained at 10 years. Results were similar for overall survival and breast-cancer-specific survival. The recurrence score is prognostic for tamoxifen-treated patients with positive nodes and predicts significant benefit of CAF in tumours with a high recurrence score. A low recurrence score identifies women who might not benefit from anthracycline-based chemotherapy, despite positive nodes. National Cancer Institute and Genomic Health. Copyright (c) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Use of Biomarkers to Guide Decisions on Adjuvant Systemic Therapy for Women With Early-Stage Invasive Breast Cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline.

              To provide recommendations on appropriate use of breast tumor biomarker assay results to guide decisions on adjuvant systemic therapy for women with early-stage invasive breast cancer.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Breast
                Breast
                The Breast : official journal of the European Society of Mastology
                Elsevier
                0960-9776
                1532-3080
                15 April 2020
                August 2020
                15 April 2020
                : 52
                : 1-7
                Affiliations
                [a ]USC Oncologia, ASST Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy
                [b ]Breast Unit, Oncologia, ASST Spedali Civili, Brescia, Italy
                [c ]USC Oncologia ASST Lariana Ospedale S. Anna, Como, Italy
                [d ]USC Oncologia ASST Fatebenefratelli Sacco, PO Sacco, Milano, Italy
                [e ]USC Oncologia ASST Fatebenefratelli Sacco, PO Fatebenefratelli, Milano, Italy
                [f ]Lab Metodologia per La Ricerca Clinica, IRCCS Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri, Milano, Italy
                [g ]S.A.V.E. Studio Analisi Valutazioni Economiche, Milano, Italy
                Author notes
                []Corresponding author. ASST Papa Giovanni XXIII, piazza OMS 1, 24127, Bergamo, Italy. alberto.zambelli@ 123456asst-pg23.it
                Article
                S0960-9776(20)30090-4
                10.1016/j.breast.2020.04.003
                7375559
                32325372
                3577e59a-fa69-4f38-b8a8-5c4ff9bf4295
                © 2020 The Authors

                This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

                History
                : 26 February 2020
                : 4 April 2020
                : 7 April 2020
                Categories
                Original Article

                Obstetrics & Gynecology
                decision impact,early breast cancer,21-gene assay,oncotype dx,recurrence score,adjuvant chemotherapy

                Comments

                Comment on this article