15
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Prejudice towards Muslims in The Netherlands: testing integrated threat theory.

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          This study uses integrated threat theory to examine Dutch adolescents' (N=1,187) prejudice towards Muslim minorities. One out of two participants was found to have negative feelings towards Muslims. Perceived symbolic and realistic threat and negative stereotypes were examined as mediators between antecedent factors (in-group identification, intergroup contact, and the endorsement of multiculturalism) and prejudice. Based on structural equation modelling, it was found that stereotypes and symbolic threats, but not realistic threats, predicted prejudice towards Muslims. Further, it was found that the effect of in-group identification on prejudice was fully mediated by symbolic threat, the effect of contact was partially mediated by stereotypes, and the effect of the endorsement of multiculturalism was mediated by both symbolic threat and stereotypes. In addition, contact and multiculturalism were directly associated with prejudice towards Muslims. The theoretical and practical implications of these findings are discussed.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Br J Soc Psychol
          The British journal of social psychology
          Wiley-Blackwell
          0144-6665
          0144-6665
          Dec 2008
          : 47
          : Pt 4
          Affiliations
          [1 ] Faculty of Social Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
          Article
          293036
          10.1348/014466608X284443
          18284782
          35d32904-3544-4c92-9fb4-58e07754575a
          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article