35
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Scoping review of patient- and family-oriented outcomes and measures for chronic pediatric disease

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Improvements in health care for children with chronic diseases must be informed by research that emphasizes outcomes of importance to patients and families. To support a program of research in the field of rare inborn errors of metabolism (IEM), we conducted a broad scoping review of primary studies that: (i) focused on chronic pediatric diseases similar to IEM in etiology or manifestations and in complexity of management; (ii) reported patient- and/or family-oriented outcomes; and (iii) measured these outcomes using self-administered tools.

          Methods

          We developed a comprehensive review protocol and implemented an electronic search strategy to identify relevant citations in Medline, EMBASE, DARE and Cochrane. Two reviewers applied pre-specified criteria to titles/abstracts using a liberal accelerated approach. Articles eligible for full-text review were screened by two independent reviewers with discrepancies resolved by consensus. One researcher abstracted data on study characteristics, patient- and family-oriented outcomes, and self-administered measures. Data were validated by a second researcher.

          Results

          4,118 citations were screened with 304 articles included. Across all included reports, the most-represented diseases were diabetes (35%), cerebral palsy (23%) and epilepsy (18%). We identified 43 unique patient- and family-oriented outcomes from among five emergent domains, with mental health outcomes appearing most frequently. The studies reported the use of 405 independent self-administered measures of these outcomes.

          Conclusions

          Patient- and family-oriented research investigating chronic pediatric diseases emphasizes mental health and appears to be relatively well-developed in the diabetes literature. Future research can build on this foundation while identifying additional outcomes that are priorities for patients and families.

          Electronic supplementary material

          The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12887-015-0323-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

          Related collections

          Most cited references27

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          The path to personalized medicine.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Family-Centered Care: Current Applications and Future Directions in Pediatric Health Care

            Family-centered care (FCC) is a partnership approach to health care decision-making between the family and health care provider. FCC is considered the standard of pediatric health care by many clinical practices, hospitals, and health care groups. Despite widespread endorsement, FCC continues to be insufficiently implemented into clinical practice. In this paper we enumerate the core principles of FCC in pediatric health care, describe recent advances applying FCC principles to clinical practice, and propose an agenda for practitioners, hospitals, and health care groups to translate FCC into improved health outcomes, health care delivery, and health care system transformation.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Evidence that school-age children can self-report on their health.

              Anne Riley (2004)
              The value of obtaining children's reports about their health from questionnaires is a topic of considerable debate in clinical pediatrics and child health research. Evidence from the following areas can inform the debate: 1) studies of parent-child agreement or concordance about the child's health state, 2) basic research on the development of children's cognitive abilities, 3) cognitive interviewing studies of children's abilities to respond to questionnaires and of influences on their responses, 4) psychometric studies of child-report questionnaires, and 5) longitudinal research on the value of children's reports. This review makes a case for the utility of child rather than parent-proxy reports for many, though not all, applications. The review summarizes evidence in terms of the value and limitations of child questionnaire reports. Research demonstrates adequate understanding and reliability and validity of child reports of their health even at age 6, which increases after age 7 in general populations. The reliability of reports by children 8-11 years old is quite good on health questionnaires developed especially for this age group. Children's personal reports provide a viable means of monitoring internal experiences of health and distress during childhood and adolescence, which can enhance understanding about trajectories of health and development of illnesses.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                khangura@uottawa.ca
                maria.karaceper@gmail.com
                yannis.trakadis@mcgill.ca
                john.mitchell@muhc.mcgill.ca
                pchakraborty@cheo.on.ca
                kylietingley@gmail.com
                doug.coyle@uottawa.ca
                sgg4@cdc.gov
                jonathan.kronick@sickkids.ca
                anne-marie.laberge.hsj@ssss.gouv.qc.ca
                jlittle@uottawa.ca
                chitra.prasad@lhsc.on.ca
                lindsey.sikora@uottawa.ca
                komudi.siriwardena@sickkids.ca
                rebecca.sparkes@albertahealthservices.ca
                kathy.speechley@lhsc.on.ca
                sstockler@cw.bc.ca
                bwilson@uottawa.ca
                kwilson@ohri.ca
                reemzayed@yahoo.com
                beth.potter@uottawa.ca
                Journal
                BMC Pediatr
                BMC Pediatr
                BMC Pediatrics
                BioMed Central (London )
                1471-2431
                13 February 2015
                13 February 2015
                2015
                : 15
                : 7
                Affiliations
                [ ]University of Ottawa, 451 Smyth Road, Ottawa, ON Canada
                [ ]Montreal Children’s Hospital, McGill University Health Centre, 2300 Tupper Street, Montreal, QC Canada
                [ ]Newborn Screening Ontario, Children’s Hospital of Eastern Ontario, 415 Smyth Road, Ottawa, ON Canada
                [ ]National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Road, Atlanta, GA USA
                [ ]University of Toronto, 27 King’s College Circle, Toronto, ON Canada
                [ ]Hospital for Sick Children, 555 University Avenue, Toronto, ON Canada
                [ ]Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine, 3175 Chemin de la Côte-Sainte-Catherine, Montreal, QC Canada
                [ ]Western University, 1151 Richmond Street, London, ON Canada
                [ ]Alberta Children’s Hospital, 2888 Shaganappi Trail NW, Calgary, AB Canada
                [ ]British Columbia Children’s Hospital, 4480 Oak Street, Vancouver, BC Canada
                [ ]Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, 725 Parkdale Avenue, Ottawa, ON Canada
                Article
                323
                10.1186/s12887-015-0323-x
                4334411
                367fffd8-3fd1-4152-8e3c-71964920fa1c
                © Khangura et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 3 October 2014
                : 26 January 2015
                Categories
                Research Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2015

                Pediatrics
                patient-centered outcomes research,patient-centered care,outcomes research,outcome measures,metabolism,inborn errors,assessment,patient outcomes,rare diseases,family-centered care

                Comments

                Comment on this article