5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Codevelopment and usability testing of Patient Engagement 101: a Patient-Oriented Research Curriculum in Child Health e-learning module for health care professionals, researchers and trainees

      research-article
      , MD PhD , , MD PhD, , HBSc, , MSc RD, , HBSc, , HBSc, , MLIS PhD, , MBChB PhD
      CMAJ Open
      CMA Impact Inc.

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background:

          Patient and family engagement is thought to improve the quality and relevance of child health research. We developed and evaluated the usability of Patient Engagement 101, an e-learning module designed to strengthen the patient-oriented research readiness of health care professionals, researchers, trainees and other stakeholders.

          Methods:

          The development of Patient Engagement 101 was co-led by a parent and a researcher and overseen by a diverse multistake-holder steering committee. The module was refined and evaluated using a mixed-methods usability testing approach with 2 iterative cycles of semistructured interviews, observations and questionnaires. We collected module feedback by way of semistructured interviews, the validated System Usability Scale, and satisfaction, knowledge and confidence questionnaires. Thematic coding of transcripts and field notes, informed by team discussions, guided the module revisions.

          Results:

          Thirty end-users completed usability testing (15 per cycle). In each cycle, we modified the module with respect to its content, learner experience, learner-centred design and aesthetic design. Participants were highly satisfied, and System Usability Scale scores indicated the module had the best imaginable usability. Substantial increases in the participants’ knowledge test scores and the confidence to engage in patient-oriented research, but not self-rated knowledge, were observed after module completion.

          Interpretation:

          Codevelopment with patients and caregivers, and refinement through comprehensive end-user testing, resulted in a training resource with exceptional usability that improved knowledge and confidence to engage in patient-oriented research in child health. Patient Engagement 101 is openly available online, and the methods used to develop and evaluate it may facilitate the creation and evaluation of similar capacity-building resources.

          Related collections

          Most cited references43

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Three approaches to qualitative content analysis.

          Content analysis is a widely used qualitative research technique. Rather than being a single method, current applications of content analysis show three distinct approaches: conventional, directed, or summative. All three approaches are used to interpret meaning from the content of text data and, hence, adhere to the naturalistic paradigm. The major differences among the approaches are coding schemes, origins of codes, and threats to trustworthiness. In conventional content analysis, coding categories are derived directly from the text data. With a directed approach, analysis starts with a theory or relevant research findings as guidance for initial codes. A summative content analysis involves counting and comparisons, usually of keywords or content, followed by the interpretation of the underlying context. The authors delineate analytic procedures specific to each approach and techniques addressing trustworthiness with hypothetical examples drawn from the area of end-of-life care.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            An Empirical Evaluation of the System Usability Scale

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              GRIPP2 reporting checklists: tools to improve reporting of patient and public involvement in research

              GRIPP2 (short form and long form) is the first international guidance for reporting of patient and public involvement in health and social care research. This paper describes the development of the GRIPP2 reporting checklists, which aim to improve the quality, transparency, and consistency of the international patient and public involvement (PPI) evidence base, to ensure that PPI practice is based on the best evidence
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                CMAJ Open
                CMAJ Open
                cmajo
                cmajo
                CMAJ Open
                CMA Impact Inc.
                2291-0026
                Oct-Dec 2022
                04 October 2022
                : 10
                : 4
                : E872-E881
                Affiliations
                Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition (Walsh, Jones), Department of Clinical Dietetics (Connan), SickKids Learning Institute (Walsh), SickKids Research Institute (Walsh, Jones, McCreath, Abuloghod, Macarthur) and Canadian Child Health Clinician Scientist Program (Pires), The Hospital for Sick Children (Walsh, Jones, McCreath, Abuloghod, Buchanan, Macarthur); Departments of Paediatrics (Walsh, Jones, Macarthur) and Physiology (Jones), and The Wilson Centre for Research in Education (Walsh), Temerty Faculty of Medicine (Walsh, Jones, Macarthur); Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation (Walsh, Buchanan), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.
                Author notes
                Correspondence to: Catharine Walsh, catharine.walsh@ 123456utoronto.ca
                Article
                cmajo.20210336
                10.9778/cmajo.20210336
                9544233
                36195343
                379e0752-3270-4fbe-b45e-831af786838b
                © 2022 CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors

                This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) licence, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original publication is properly cited, the use is noncommercial (i.e., research or educational use), and no modifications or adaptations are made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

                History
                Categories
                Research

                Comments

                Comment on this article