13
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      NK cell activity and methylated HOXA9 ctDNA as prognostic biomarkers in patients with non-small cell lung cancer treated with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors have improved survival for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We evaluated natural killer cell activity (NKA) and methylated HOXA9 circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) as prognostic biomarkers in NSCLC patients treated with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors.

          Methods

          Plasma was prospectively collected from 71 NSCLC patients before treatment with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors and before cycles 2–4. We used the NK Vue ® assay to measure the level of interferon gamma (IFNγ) as a surrogate for NKA. Methylated HOXA9 was measured by droplet digital PCR.

          Results

          A score combining NKA and ctDNA status measured after one treatment cycle had a strong prognostic impact. Group 1 had IFNγ < 250 pg/ml and detectable ctDNA ( n = 27), group 2 consisted of patients with either low levels of IFNγ and undetectable ctDNA or high levels of IFNγ and detectable ctDNA ( n = 29), group 3 had IFNγ ≥250 pg/ml and undetectable ctDNA ( n = 15). Median OS was 221 days (95% CI 121–539 days), 419 days (95% CI 235–650 days), and 1158 days (95% CI 250 days—not reached), respectively ( P = 0.002). Group 1 had a poor prognosis with a hazard ratio of 5.560 (95% CI 2.359–13.101, n = 71, P < 0.001) adjusting for PD-L1 status, histology, and performance status.

          Conclusions

          Combining NKA and ctDNA status after one cycle of treatment was prognostic in patients with NSCLC treated with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors.

          Related collections

          Most cited references44

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1).

          Assessment of the change in tumour burden is an important feature of the clinical evaluation of cancer therapeutics: both tumour shrinkage (objective response) and disease progression are useful endpoints in clinical trials. Since RECIST was published in 2000, many investigators, cooperative groups, industry and government authorities have adopted these criteria in the assessment of treatment outcomes. However, a number of questions and issues have arisen which have led to the development of a revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Evidence for changes, summarised in separate papers in this special issue, has come from assessment of a large data warehouse (>6500 patients), simulation studies and literature reviews. HIGHLIGHTS OF REVISED RECIST 1.1: Major changes include: Number of lesions to be assessed: based on evidence from numerous trial databases merged into a data warehouse for analysis purposes, the number of lesions required to assess tumour burden for response determination has been reduced from a maximum of 10 to a maximum of five total (and from five to two per organ, maximum). Assessment of pathological lymph nodes is now incorporated: nodes with a short axis of 15 mm are considered measurable and assessable as target lesions. The short axis measurement should be included in the sum of lesions in calculation of tumour response. Nodes that shrink to <10mm short axis are considered normal. Confirmation of response is required for trials with response primary endpoint but is no longer required in randomised studies since the control arm serves as appropriate means of interpretation of data. Disease progression is clarified in several aspects: in addition to the previous definition of progression in target disease of 20% increase in sum, a 5mm absolute increase is now required as well to guard against over calling PD when the total sum is very small. Furthermore, there is guidance offered on what constitutes 'unequivocal progression' of non-measurable/non-target disease, a source of confusion in the original RECIST guideline. Finally, a section on detection of new lesions, including the interpretation of FDG-PET scan assessment is included. Imaging guidance: the revised RECIST includes a new imaging appendix with updated recommendations on the optimal anatomical assessment of lesions. A key question considered by the RECIST Working Group in developing RECIST 1.1 was whether it was appropriate to move from anatomic unidimensional assessment of tumour burden to either volumetric anatomical assessment or to functional assessment with PET or MRI. It was concluded that, at present, there is not sufficient standardisation or evidence to abandon anatomical assessment of tumour burden. The only exception to this is in the use of FDG-PET imaging as an adjunct to determination of progression. As is detailed in the final paper in this special issue, the use of these promising newer approaches requires appropriate clinical validation studies.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Pembrolizumab versus Chemotherapy for PD-L1–Positive Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer

            Pembrolizumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody against programmed death 1 (PD-1) that has antitumor activity in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), with increased activity in tumors that express programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1).
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Pembrolizumab plus Chemotherapy in Metastatic Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer

              First-line therapy for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) that lacks targetable mutations is platinum-based chemotherapy. Among patients with a tumor proportion score for programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) of 50% or greater, pembrolizumab has replaced cytotoxic chemotherapy as the first-line treatment of choice. The addition of pembrolizumab to chemotherapy resulted in significantly higher rates of response and longer progression-free survival than chemotherapy alone in a phase 2 trial.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                sara.witting.christensen.wen@rsyd.dk
                Journal
                Br J Cancer
                Br J Cancer
                British Journal of Cancer
                Nature Publishing Group UK (London )
                0007-0920
                1532-1827
                3 May 2023
                3 May 2023
                27 July 2023
                : 129
                : 1
                : 135-142
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.7143.1, ISNI 0000 0004 0512 5013, Department of Oncology, Vejle Hospital, , University Hospital of Southern Denmark, ; Beriderbakken 4, 7100 Vejle, Denmark
                [2 ]GRID grid.10825.3e, ISNI 0000 0001 0728 0170, Department of Regional Health Research, , University of Southern Denmark, ; J.B. Winsloews Vej 19, 3rd floor, 5000 Odense C, Denmark
                [3 ]GRID grid.7143.1, ISNI 0000 0004 0512 5013, Department of Biochemistry and Immunology, Vejle Hospital, , University Hospital of Southern Denmark, ; Beriderbakken 4, 7100 Vejle, Denmark
                [4 ]GRID grid.7143.1, ISNI 0000 0004 0512 5013, Department of Medicine, Vejle Hospital, , University Hospital of Southern Denmark, ; Beriderbakken 4, 7100 Vejle, Denmark
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3755-0922
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7476-671X
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2110-2615
                Article
                2285
                10.1038/s41416-023-02285-z
                10307873
                37137997
                37fbbbfd-7040-4d3a-a5d4-e18ddc2ad6e7
                © The Author(s) 2023

                Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                History
                : 5 May 2022
                : 7 April 2023
                : 17 April 2023
                Funding
                Funded by: Regional Strategic Council for Research in the Region of Southern Denmark, Dansk Kræftforskningsfond (The Danish Foundation for Cancer Research), and the DCCC ctDNA Research Center - The Danish Research Center for Circulating Tumor DNA Guided Cancer Management, Danish Cancer Society (grant no. R257-A14700) and Danish Comprehensive Cancer Center. NK Max provided the NK Vue kits free of charge.
                Funded by: Regional Strategic Council for Research in the Region of Southern Denmark, Dansk Kræftforskningsfond (The Danish Foundation for Cancer Research), and the DCCC ctDNA Research Center - The Danish Research Center for Circulating Tumor DNA Guided Cancer Management, Danish Cancer Society (grant no. R257-A14700) and Danish Comprehensive Cancer Center. NK Max provided the NK Vue® kits free of charge.
                Funded by: Regional Strategic Council for Research in the Region of Southern Denmark, Dansk Kræftforskningsfond (The Danish Foundation for Cancer Research), and the DCCC ctDNA Research Center - The Danish Research Center for Circulating Tumor DNA Guided Cancer Management, Danish Cancer Society (grant no. R257-A14700) and Danish Comprehensive Cancer Center. NK Max provided the NK Vue® kits free of charge.
                Categories
                Article
                Custom metadata
                © Springer Nature Limited 2023

                Oncology & Radiotherapy
                prognostic markers,non-small-cell lung cancer,dna,innate immune cells,immunotherapy

                Comments

                Comment on this article