22
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Temporal quantification of mating system parameters in a coastal Douglas-fir seed orchard under manipulated pollination environment

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Seed orchards main function is delivering breeding programs’ gains in the form of genetically improved seedlings. They are unique experimental populations, perfectly suited for studying various pollination environments (natural or otherwise), affecting their mating system parameters. Here, under different pollination environment (natural and intrusive (pollen augmentation and/or bloom-delay)), the mating system of a second generation, wind-pollinated, coastal Douglas-fir ( Pseudotsuga menziesii var. menziesii (Mirb.) Franco) seed orchard was evaluated over four years. Using DNA microsatellite markers and bulk seed samples, we conducted pedigree reconstruction to assign each seed’s male and female parents, followed by determining the extent of pollen contamination (external gene flow), selfing rate, and, parental gametic contribution for each year. Overall, external pollen contamination rates ranged between 10 and 28%, selfing rate varied between 12 and 17%, and 80% of the seed crops were produced by 37–64% of the orchard’s parents. Pollination environment and seed crop size substantially influenced the observed results, particularly for small crops as pollen contamination was high in natural (28%) vs. intrusive pollination (10%). Generally, irrespective of the crop size, seed produced under natural pollination had higher pollen contamination, confirming the role of pollination environment manipulation in improving seed crops’ genetic quality.

          Related collections

          Most cited references39

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Isolation of plant DNA from fesh tissue

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Comparison of microsatellites and amplified fragment length polymorphism markers for parentage analysis.

            This study compares the properties of dominant markers, such as amplified fragment length polymorphisms (AFLPs), with those of codominant multiallelic markers, such as microsatellites, in reconstructing parentage. These two types of markers were used to search for both parents of an individual without prior knowledge of their relationships, by calculating likelihood ratios based on genotypic data, including mistyping. Experimental data on 89 oak trees genotyped for six microsatellite markers and 159 polymorphic AFLP loci were used as a starting point for simulations and tests. Both sets of markers produced high exclusion probabilities, and among dominant markers those with dominant allele frequencies in the range 0.1-0.4 were more informative. Such codominant and dominant markers can be used to construct powerful statistical tests to decide whether a genotyped individual (or two individuals) can be considered as the true parent (or parent pair). Gene flow from outside the study stand (GFO), inferred from parentage analysis with microsatellites, overestimated the true GFO, whereas with AFLPs it was underestimated. As expected, dominant markers are less efficient than codominant markers for achieving this, but can still be used with good confidence, especially when loci are deliberately selected according to their allele frequencies.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              The development of British Columbia's tree seed transfer guidelines: Purpose, concept, methodology, and implementation

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                y.el-kassaby@ubc.ca
                Journal
                Sci Rep
                Sci Rep
                Scientific Reports
                Nature Publishing Group UK (London )
                2045-2322
                2 August 2018
                2 August 2018
                2018
                : 8
                : 11593
                Affiliations
                [1 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2288 9830, GRID grid.17091.3e, Department of Forest and Conservation Sciences, Faculty of Forestry, , University of British Columbia, ; Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4 Canada
                [2 ]ISNI 0000 0004 1936 8198, GRID grid.34429.38, Department of Integrative Biology, College of Biological Science, , University of Guelph, ; Guelph, ON N1G 2W1 Canada
                [3 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2238 631X, GRID grid.15866.3c, Faculty of Forestry and Wood Sciences, , Czech University of Life Sciences, ; 165 21 Praha, Czech Republic
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4469-2929
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4887-8977
                Article
                30041
                10.1038/s41598-018-30041-4
                6072752
                30072772
                384dd887-17eb-4831-96c8-43bf33f8b39c
                © The Author(s) 2018

                Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                History
                : 5 February 2018
                : 20 July 2018
                Categories
                Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2018

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article