23
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Acute effects of static versus proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation stretching volume on the maximum number of repetitions and perceived exertion

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Abstract AIMS The purpose of this study was to examine the acute effects between different volumes of static stretching (SS) and proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation (PNF) stretching (30 and 60 seconds) on the maximum number of repetitions at 40 and 80% 1RM and rating of perceived exertion (RPE). METHODS Eleven recreationally-trained women (26.45 ± 5.27 years) performed ten experimental protocols using a repeated measures crossover design: (a) 30 s of SS followed by 40% of 1RM (SS1); (b) 60 s of SS followed by 40% of 1RM (SS2); (c) 30 s of SS followed by 80% of 1RM (SS3); (d) 60 s of SS followed by 80% of 1RM (SS4); (e) 30 s of PNF followed by 40% of 1RM (PNF1); (f) 60 s of PNF followed by 40% of 1RM (PNF2); (g) 30 s of PNF followed by 80% of 1RM (PNF3); (h) 60 s of PNF followed by 80% of 1RM (PNF4); (i) 40% of 1RM with no stretching (NS1); and (j) 80% of 1RM with no stretching (NS2). In both stretching protocols, shoulder girdle muscle exercises were performed. RESULTSStretching volume did not seem to significantly decrease the number of repetitions after a bench press session (p>0.05). However, RPE was greater for PNF2 (28.5±1.0; p=0.016) when compared with PNF1 (26.9±1.9). CONCLUSION Stretching volume does not seem to decrease the maximum number of repetitions after a bench press session; however, greater stretching volume appears to increase perception of effort in women when using PNF stretching of longer duration.

          Related collections

          Most cited references28

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Quantifying test-retest reliability using the intraclass correlation coefficient and the SEM.

          Reliability, the consistency of a test or measurement, is frequently quantified in the movement sciences literature. A common metric is the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). In addition, the SEM, which can be calculated from the ICC, is also frequently reported in reliability studies. However, there are several versions of the ICC, and confusion exists in the movement sciences regarding which ICC to use. Further, the utility of the SEM is not fully appreciated. In this review, the basics of classic reliability theory are addressed in the context of choosing and interpreting an ICC. The primary distinction between ICC equations is argued to be one concerning the inclusion (equations 2,1 and 2,k) or exclusion (equations 3,1 and 3,k) of systematic error in the denominator of the ICC equation. Inferential tests of mean differences, which are performed in the process of deriving the necessary variance components for the calculation of ICC values, are useful to determine if systematic error is present. If so, the measurement schedule should be modified (removing trials where learning and/or fatigue effects are present) to remove systematic error, and ICC equations that only consider random error may be safely used. The use of ICC values is discussed in the context of estimating the effects of measurement error on sample size, statistical power, and correlation attenuation. Finally, calculation and application of the SEM are discussed. It is shown how the SEM and its variants can be used to construct confidence intervals for individual scores and to determine the minimal difference needed to be exhibited for one to be confident that a true change in performance of an individual has occurred.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Resistance exercise in individuals with and without cardiovascular disease: 2007 update: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Council on Clinical Cardiology and Council on Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Metabolism.

            Prescribed and supervised resistance training (RT) enhances muscular strength and endurance, functional capacity and independence, and quality of life while reducing disability in persons with and without cardiovascular disease. These benefits have made RT an accepted component of programs for health and fitness. The American Heart Association recommendations describing the rationale for participation in and considerations for prescribing RT were published in 2000. This update provides current information regarding the (1) health benefits of RT, (2) impact of RT on the cardiovascular system structure and function, (3) role of RT in modifying cardiovascular disease risk factors, (4) benefits in selected populations, (5) process of medical evaluation for participation in RT, and (6) prescriptive methods. The purpose of this update is to provide clinicians with recommendations to facilitate the use of this valuable modality.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Determining the magnitude of treatment effects in strength training research through the use of the effect size.

              In order to improve the applicability of research to exercise professionals, it is suggested that researchers analyze and report data in intervention studies that can be interpreted in relation to other studies. The effect size and proposed scale for determining the magnitude of the treatment effect can assist strength and conditioning professionals in interpreting and applying the findings of the strength training studies.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: ND
                Role: ND
                Role: ND
                Role: ND
                Role: ND
                Role: ND
                Journal
                motriz
                Motriz: Revista de Educação Física
                Motriz: rev. educ. fis.
                Universidade Estadual Paulista (Rio Claro, SP, Brazil )
                1980-6574
                September 2018
                : 24
                : 2
                : e1018151
                Affiliations
                [6] Juiz de Fora Minas Gerais orgnameUniversidade Federal de Juiz de Fora orgdiv1Department of Physical Education orgdiv2Physical Education Post Graduation Program Brazil
                [2] João Pessoa orgnameUniversidade Federal da Paraíba orgdiv1Department of Physical Education orgdiv2Kinanthropometry and Human Development Laboratory Brazil
                [9] Campina Grande PB orgnameCentro de Ensino Superior e Desenvolvimento orgdiv1Coordination of Physical Education Brazil
                [1] Cajazeiras Paraíba orgnameFaculdade de Filosofia, Ciências e Letras de Cajazeiras orgdiv1Coordination of Physical Education Brazil
                [7] Fullerton California orgnameUniversity of California orgdiv1Department of Kinesiology orgdiv2Exercise Physiology Laboratory United States
                [4] Crato Ceará orgnameUniversidade Regional do Cariri orgdiv1Department of Physical Education Brazil
                [3] João Pessoa orgnameUniversidade Federal da Paraíba orgdiv1Department of Physical Education orgdiv2Programa Associado de Pós-graduação em Educação Física Brazil
                [8] João Pessoa Paraíba orgnameFaculdade de Enfermagem Nova Esperança orgdiv1Coordination of Physical Education orgdiv2Professional Master’s in Family Health Brazil
                [5] Rio de Janeiro RJ orgnameUniversidade Federal da Rio de Janeiro orgdiv1Department of Gymnastics orgdiv2Physical Education Graduate Program Brazil
                Article
                S1980-65742018000200314
                10.1590/s1980-6574201800020014
                395d49b5-a1d0-4e3c-85ee-32294dbb94b8

                This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

                History
                : 28 May 2018
                : 26 October 2017
                Page count
                Figures: 0, Tables: 0, Equations: 0, References: 32, Pages: 0
                Product

                SciELO Brazil


                resistance training,flexibility,women,athletic performance,perception

                Comments

                Comment on this article