7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Absolute and relative reliability of pain sensitivity and functional outcomes of the affected shoulder among women with pain after breast cancer treatment

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective

          Breast cancer survivors (BCS) are often characterized by decreased pressure pain thresholds (PPT), range of motion (ROM) and strength in and around the shoulder affected by the treatment. This intra-rater reliability study was to establish the relative and absolute reliability of PPT’s, active ROM and maximal isokinetic muscle strength (MIMS) of the affected shoulder in BCS with persistent pain after treatment.

          Methods

          Twenty-one BCS participated in the study. The PPTs of 17 locations and pain intensity were assessed using a pressure algometer and a numeric rating scale. The ROM was measured using a universal goniometer and MIMS was measured using an isokinetic dynamometer. Relative reliability was estimated using intra class correlation coefficient (ICC), and absolute reliability using standard error of measurement (SEM). Minimum detectable change (MDC) was calculated from SEM.

          Results

          The ICCs for PPTs ranged from 0.88–0.97, with SEM values ranging from 12.0 to 28.2 kPa and MDC ranging from 33.2 to 78.2 kPa. The ICCs for ROM ranged from 0.66–0.97, with SEM values ranging from 3.0 to 7.5° and MDC ranging from 8.4 to 20.8°. Finally, ICCs for MIMS ranged from 0.62–0.92, with SEM values ranging from 0.03 to 0.07 Nm/Kg FFM and MDC ranging from 0.09 to 0.19 Nm/kg FFM.

          Conclusion

          The results of this study indicate that PPTs, ROM and MIMS can be measured reliably on the affected shoulder in BCS with pain after treatment. This offer the possibility of using these measures to assess the effectiveness of interventions in this population.

          Related collections

          Most cited references51

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Clinical measurement of range of motion. Review of goniometry emphasizing reliability and validity.

          Clinical measurement of range of motion is a fundamental evaluation procedure with ubiquitous application in physical therapy. Objective measurements of ROM and correct interpretation of the measurement results can have a substantial impact on the development of the scientific basis of therapeutic interventions. The purpose of this article is to review the related literature on the reliability and validity of goniometric measurements of the extremities. Special emphasis is placed on how the reliability of goniometry is influenced by instrumentation and procedures, differences among joint actions and body regions, passive versus active measurements, intratester versus intertester measurements, and different patient types. Our discussion of validity encourages objective interpretation of the meaning of ROM measurements in light of the purposes and the limitations of goniometry. We conclude that clinicians should adopt standardized methods of testing and should interpret and report goniometric results as ROM measurements only, not as measurements of factors that may affect ROM.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Reliability, standard error, and minimum detectable change of clinical pressure pain threshold testing in people with and without acute neck pain.

            Clinical measurement. To evaluate the intrarater, interrater, and test-retest reliability of an accessible digital algometer, and to determine the minimum detectable change in normal healthy individuals and a clinical population with neck pain. Pressure pain threshold testing may be a valuable assessment and prognostic indicator for people with neck pain. To date, most of this research has been completed using algometers that are too resource intensive for routine clinical use. Novice raters (physiotherapy students or clinical physiotherapists) were trained to perform algometry testing over 2 clinically relevant sites: the angle of the upper trapezius and the belly of the tibialis anterior. A convenience sample of normal healthy individuals and a clinical sample of people with neck pain were tested by 2 different raters (all participants) and on 2 different days (healthy participants only). Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), standard error of measurement, and minimum detectable change were calculated. A total of 60 healthy volunteers and 40 people with neck pain were recruited. Intrarater reliability was almost perfect (ICC = 0.94-0.97), interrater reliability was substantial to near perfect (ICC = 0.79-0.90), and test-retest reliability was substantial (ICC = 0.76-0.79). Smaller change was detectable in the trapezius compared to the tibialis anterior. This study provides evidence that novice raters can perform digital algometry with adequate reliability for research and clinical use in people with and without neck pain.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Book: not found

              A simplified guide to determination of sample size requirements for estimating the value of intraclass correlation coefficient: a review

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Data curationRole: Formal analysisRole: Funding acquisitionRole: InvestigationRole: MethodologyRole: Project administrationRole: Writing – original draft
                Role: Formal analysisRole: Funding acquisitionRole: SupervisionRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Funding acquisitionRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Formal analysisRole: Funding acquisitionRole: SupervisionRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Formal analysisRole: Funding acquisitionRole: SupervisionRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS One
                PLoS ONE
                plos
                plosone
                PLoS ONE
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, CA USA )
                1932-6203
                3 June 2020
                2020
                : 15
                : 6
                : e0234118
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Department of Health Science and Technology, Sport Sciences - Performance and Technology, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
                [2 ] Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Granada, Granada, Spain
                Universidad de Leon, SPAIN
                Author notes

                Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6916-3121
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2164-234X
                Article
                PONE-D-20-08793
                10.1371/journal.pone.0234118
                7269234
                32492064
                39bd79f4-819d-4821-a8a7-cbc6fe447636
                © 2020 Rasmussen et al

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 27 March 2020
                : 19 May 2020
                Page count
                Figures: 6, Tables: 4, Pages: 16
                Funding
                Funded by: funder-id http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100008363, Kræftens Bekæmpelse;
                Award ID: R204-A12469
                Award Recipient : Pascal Madeleine
                GHFR, PM, MK and MV received a grant (grant nr. R204-A12469) from the Danish Cancer Society (URL: https://www.cancer.dk/). The grant covered salary and equipment expenses. The funder had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
                Categories
                Research Article
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Anatomy
                Musculoskeletal System
                Shoulders
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Anatomy
                Musculoskeletal System
                Shoulders
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Physiology
                Sensory Physiology
                Somatosensory System
                Pain Sensation
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Physiology
                Sensory Physiology
                Somatosensory System
                Pain Sensation
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Neuroscience
                Sensory Systems
                Somatosensory System
                Pain Sensation
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Diagnostic Medicine
                Signs and Symptoms
                Pain
                Myalgia
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Pathology and Laboratory Medicine
                Signs and Symptoms
                Pain
                Myalgia
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Oncology
                Cancers and Neoplasms
                Breast Tumors
                Breast Cancer
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Oncology
                Cancer Treatment
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Anatomy
                Musculoskeletal System
                Skeletal Joints
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Anatomy
                Musculoskeletal System
                Skeletal Joints
                Research and Analysis Methods
                Research Assessment
                Research Validity
                Research and Analysis Methods
                Bioassays and Physiological Analysis
                Muscle Analysis
                Custom metadata
                All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article