16
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares

      To submit to the journal, please click here

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Biphasic voltage‐dependent inactivation of human Na V1.3, 1.6 and 1.7 Na + channels expressed in rodent insulin‐secreting cells

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Key points

          • Na + current inactivation is biphasic in insulin‐secreting cells, proceeding with two voltage dependences that are half‐maximal at ∼−100 mV and −60 mV.

          • Inactivation of voltage‐gated Na + (Na V) channels occurs at ∼30 mV more negative voltages in insulin‐secreting Ins1 and primary β‐cells than in HEK, CHO or glucagon‐secreting αTC1‐6 cells.

          • The difference in inactivation between Ins1 and non‐β‐cells persists in the inside‐out patch configuration, discounting an involvement of a diffusible factor.

          • In Ins1 cells and primary β‐cells, but not in HEK cells, inactivation of a single Na V subtype is biphasic and follows two voltage dependences separated by 30–40 mV.

          • We propose that Na V channels adopt different inactivation behaviours depending on the local membrane environment.

          Abstract

          Pancreatic β‐cells are equipped with voltage‐gated Na + channels that undergo biphasic voltage‐dependent steady‐state inactivation. A small Na + current component (10–15%) inactivates over physiological membrane potentials and contributes to action potential firing. However, the major Na + channel component is completely inactivated at −90 to −80 mV and is therefore inactive in the β‐cell. It has been proposed that the biphasic inactivation reflects the contribution of different Na V α‐subunits. We tested this possibility by expression of TTX‐resistant variants of the Na V subunits found in β‐cells (Na V1.3, Na V1.6 and Na V1.7) in insulin‐secreting Ins1 cells and in non‐β‐cells (including HEK and CHO cells). We found that all Na V subunits inactivated at 20–30 mV more negative membrane potentials in Ins1 cells than in HEK or CHO cells. The more negative inactivation in Ins1 cells does not involve a diffusible intracellular factor because the difference between Ins1 and CHO persisted after excision of the membrane. Na V1.7 inactivated at 15‐­20 mV more negative membrane potentials than Na V1.3 and Na V1.6 in Ins1 cells but this small difference is insufficient to solely explain the biphasic inactivation in Ins1 cells. In Ins1 cells, but never in the other cell types, widely different components of Na V inactivation (separated by 30 mV) were also observed following expression of a single type of Na V α‐subunit. The more positive component exhibited a voltage dependence of inactivation similar to that found in HEK and CHO cells. We propose that biphasic Na V inactivation in insulin‐secreting cells reflects insertion of channels in membrane domains that differ with regard to lipid and/or membrane protein composition.

          Key points

          • Na + current inactivation is biphasic in insulin‐secreting cells, proceeding with two voltage dependences that are half‐maximal at ∼−100 mV and −60 mV.

          • Inactivation of voltage‐gated Na + (Na V) channels occurs at ∼30 mV more negative voltages in insulin‐secreting Ins1 and primary β‐cells than in HEK, CHO or glucagon‐secreting αTC1‐6 cells.

          • The difference in inactivation between Ins1 and non‐β‐cells persists in the inside‐out patch configuration, discounting an involvement of a diffusible factor.

          • In Ins1 cells and primary β‐cells, but not in HEK cells, inactivation of a single Na V subtype is biphasic and follows two voltage dependences separated by 30–40 mV.

          • We propose that Na V channels adopt different inactivation behaviours depending on the local membrane environment.

          Related collections

          Most cited references43

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Pancreatic β-Cell Electrical Activity and Insulin Secretion: Of Mice and Men.

          The pancreatic β-cell plays a key role in glucose homeostasis by secreting insulin, the only hormone capable of lowering the blood glucose concentration. Impaired insulin secretion results in the chronic hyperglycemia that characterizes type 2 diabetes (T2DM), which currently afflicts >450 million people worldwide. The healthy β-cell acts as a glucose sensor matching its output to the circulating glucose concentration. It does so via metabolically induced changes in electrical activity, which culminate in an increase in the cytoplasmic Ca2+ concentration and initiation of Ca2+-dependent exocytosis of insulin-containing secretory granules. Here, we review recent advances in our understanding of the β-cell transcriptome, electrical activity, and insulin exocytosis. We highlight salient differences between mouse and human β-cells, provide models of how the different ion channels contribute to their electrical activity and insulin secretion, and conclude by discussing how these processes become perturbed in T2DM.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The Na(V)1.7 sodium channel: from molecule to man.

            The voltage-gated sodium channel Na(V)1.7 is preferentially expressed in peripheral somatic and visceral sensory neurons, olfactory sensory neurons and sympathetic ganglion neurons. Na(V)1.7 accumulates at nerve fibre endings and amplifies small subthreshold depolarizations, poising it to act as a threshold channel that regulates excitability. Genetic and functional studies have added to the evidence that Na(V)1.7 is a major contributor to pain signalling in humans, and homology modelling based on crystal structures of ion channels suggests an atomic-level structural basis for the altered gating of mutant Na(V)1.7 that causes pain.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Comprehensive alpha, beta and delta cell transcriptomes reveal that ghrelin selectively activates delta cells and promotes somatostatin release from pancreatic islets

              Objective Complex local crosstalk amongst endocrine cells within the islet ensures tight coordination of their endocrine output. This is illustrated by the recent demonstration that the negative feedback control by delta cells within pancreatic islets determines the homeostatic set-point for plasma glucose during mouse postnatal development. However, the close association of islet endocrine cells that facilitates paracrine crosstalk also complicates the distinction between effects mediated directly on beta cells from indirect effects mediated via local intermediates, such as somatostatin from delta cells. Methods To resolve this problem, we generated reporter mice that allow collection of pure pancreatic delta cells along with alpha and beta cells from the same islets and generated comprehensive transcriptomes for each islet endocrine cell type. These transcriptomes afford an unparalleled view of the receptors expressed by delta, alpha and beta cells, and allow the prediction of which signal targets which endocrine cell type with great accuracy. Results From these transcriptomes, we discovered that the ghrelin receptor is expressed exclusively by delta cells within the islet, which was confirmed by fluorescent in situ hybridization and qPCR. Indeed, ghrelin increases intracellular calcium in delta cells in intact mouse islets, measured by GCaMP6 and robustly potentiates glucose-stimulated somatostatin secretion on mouse and human islets in both static and perfusion assays. In contrast, des-acyl-ghrelin at the same dose had no effect on somatostatin secretion and did not block the actions of ghrelin. Conclusions These results offer a straightforward explanation for the well-known insulinostatic actions of ghrelin. Rather than engaging beta cells directly, ghrelin engages delta cells to promote local inhibitory feedback that attenuates insulin release. These findings illustrate the power of our approach to resolve some of the long-standing conundrums with regard to the rich feedback that occurs within the islet that is integral to islet physiology and therefore highly relevant to diabetes.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                margarita.chibalina@ocdem.ox.ac.uk
                patrik.rorsman@drl.ox.ac.uk
                Journal
                J Physiol
                J. Physiol. (Lond.)
                10.1111/(ISSN)1469-7793
                TJP
                jphysiol
                The Journal of Physiology
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                0022-3751
                1469-7793
                30 March 2018
                01 May 2018
                30 March 2018
                : 596
                : 9 ( doiID: 10.1113/tjp.2018.596.issue-9 )
                : 1601-1626
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Oxford Centre for Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolism, Radcliffe Department of Medicine University of Oxford Churchill Hospital Oxford OX3 7LE UK
                [ 2 ] Metabolic Physiology Department of Neuroscience and Physiology Medicinaregatan 11 Gothenburg S‐413 09 Sweden
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Corresponding authors M. V. Chibalina and P. Rorsman: Oxford Centre for Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolism, Radcliffe Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Churchill Hospital, Oxford OX3 7LE, UK. Email:  margarita.chibalina@ 123456ocdem.ox.ac.uk and patrik.rorsman@ 123456drl.ox.ac.uk
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7330-7965
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3626-4855
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7578-0767
                Article
                TJP12869
                10.1113/JP275587
                5924821
                29441586
                3a55be2f-e051-461e-92d8-bcf520626074
                © 2018 The Authors. The Journal of Physiology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of The Physiological Society

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 16 November 2017
                : 06 February 2018
                Page count
                Figures: 17, Tables: 5, Pages: 26, Words: 12620
                Funding
                Funded by: Wellcome Trust
                Award ID: 095531/2/11/2
                Funded by: RDM Scholars DPhil studentship
                Categories
                Research Paper
                Molecular and cellular
                Editor's Choice
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                tjp12869
                1 May 2018
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_NLMPMC version:version=5.3.7.2 mode:remove_FC converted:30.04.2018

                Human biology
                voltage‐gated sodium channels,pancreatic beta‐cell,voltage‐dependent inactivation,insulin secretion,electrical activity

                Comments

                Comment on this article