6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Effects of FGFR inhibitors TKI258, BGJ398 and AZD4547 on breast cancer cells in 2D, 3D and tissue explant cultures

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Purpose

          Fibroblast growth factor receptors (FGFR) and pathways are important players in breast cancer (BC) development. They are commonly altered, and BCs exhibiting FGFR gene amplification are currently being studied for drug development. Here, we aimed to compare the effects of three FGFR inhibitors (FGFRis), i.e., non-selective TKI258 and selective BGJ398 and AZD4547, on different BC-derived cell lines (BCCs) and primary tissues.

          Methods

          The human BCCs MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231(SA) (wild-type FGFR) and MFM223 (amplified FGFR1 and FGFR2) were analyzed for FGFR expression using qRT-PCR, and the effects of FGFRis on FGFR signaling by Western blotting. The effects of FGFRis on proliferation, viability, migration and invasion of BCCs were assessed in 2D cultures using live-cell imaging, and in 3D cultures using phenotypic analysis of organoids. To study radio-sensitization, FGFRi treatment was combined with irradiation. Patient-derived BC samples were treated with FGFRis in explant cultures and immunostained for Ki67 and cleaved caspase 3.

          Results

          We found that all FGFRis tested decreased the growth and viability of BC cells in 2D and 3D cultures. BGJ398 and AZD4547 were found to be potent at low concentrations in FGFR-amplified MFM233 cells, whereas higher concentrations were required in non-amplified MCF7 and MDA-MB-231(SA) cells. TKI258 inhibited the migration and invasion, whereas BGJ398 and AZD4547 only inhibited the invasion of MDA-MB-231(SA) cells. FGFRi treatment of MCF7 and MFM223 cells enhanced the inhibitory effect of radiotherapy, but this effect was not observed in MDA-MB-231(SA) cells. FGFRi-treated primary BC explants with moderate FGFR levels showed a tendency towards decreased proliferation and increased apoptosis.

          Conclusions

          Our results indicate that, besides targeting FGFR-amplified BCs with selective FGFRis, also BCs without FGFR amplification/activation may benefit from FGFRi-treatment. Combination with other treatment modalities, such as radiotherapy, may allow the use of FGFRis at relatively low concentrations and, thereby, contribute to better BC treatment outcomes.

          Supplementary Information

          The online version of this article (10.1007/s13402-020-00562-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

          Related collections

          Most cited references30

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          FGFR1 amplification drives endocrine therapy resistance and is a therapeutic target in breast cancer.

          Amplification of fibroblast growth factor receptor 1 (FGFR1) occurs in approximately 10% of breast cancers and is associated with poor prognosis. However, it is uncertain whether overexpression of FGFR1 is causally linked to the poor prognosis of amplified cancers. Here, we show that FGFR1 overexpression is robustly associated with FGFR1 amplification in two independent series of breast cancers. Breast cancer cell lines with FGFR1 overexpression and amplification show enhanced ligand-dependent signaling, with increased activation of the mitogen-activated protein kinase and phosphoinositide 3-kinase-AKT signaling pathways in response to FGF2, but also show basal ligand-independent signaling, and are dependent on FGFR signaling for anchorage-independent growth. FGFR1-amplified cell lines show resistance to 4-hydroxytamoxifen, which is reversed by small interfering RNA silencing of FGFR1, suggesting that FGFR1 overexpression also promotes endocrine therapy resistance. FGFR1 signaling suppresses progesterone receptor (PR) expression in vitro, and likewise, amplified cancers are frequently PR negative, identifying a potential biomarker for FGFR1 activity. Furthermore, we show that amplified cancers have a high proliferative rate assessed by Ki67 staining and that FGFR1 amplification is found in 16% to 27% of luminal B-type breast cancers. Our data suggest that amplification and overexpression of FGFR1 may be a major contributor to poor prognosis in luminal-type breast cancers, driving anchorage-independent proliferation and endocrine therapy resistance.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Advances and challenges in targeting FGFR signalling in cancer

            Deregulation of fibroblast growth factor (FGF) signalling is observed in several types of cancer, which makes this pathway a highly promising potential therapeutic target. However, aberrant FGF receptor (FGFR) signalling can be challenging. In this Review, Babina et al. discuss the differences between diverse mechanisms of oncogenic activation of FGFR, and the factors that determine response and resistance to FGFR targeting.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              A multigenic program mediating breast cancer metastasis to bone.

              We investigated the molecular basis for osteolytic bone metastasis by selecting human breast cancer cell line subpopulations with elevated metastatic activity and functionally validating genes that are overexpressed in these cells. These genes act cooperatively to cause osteolytic metastasis, and most of them encode secreted and cell surface proteins. Two of these genes, interleukin-11 and CTGF, encode osteolytic and angiogenic factors whose expression is further increased by the prometastatic cytokine TGF beta. Overexpression of this bone metastasis gene set is superimposed on a poor-prognosis gene expression signature already present in the parental breast cancer population, suggesting that metastasis requires a set of functions beyond those underlying the emergence of the primary tumor.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                pirkko.harkonen@utu.fi , https://www.utu.fi/en/university/faculty-of-medicine/institute-of-biomedicine
                Journal
                Cell Oncol (Dordr)
                Cell Oncol (Dordr)
                Cellular Oncology (Dordrecht)
                Springer Netherlands (Dordrecht )
                2211-3428
                2211-3436
                29 October 2020
                29 October 2020
                2021
                : 44
                : 1
                : 205-218
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.1374.1, ISNI 0000 0001 2097 1371, University of Turku, Institute of Biomedicine, ; 20520 Turku, Finland
                [2 ]FICAN West Cancer Centre, 20520 Turku, Finland
                [3 ]GRID grid.410552.7, ISNI 0000 0004 0628 215X, Department of Pathology, , Turku University Hospital, ; 20520 Turku, Finland
                [4 ]GRID grid.410552.7, ISNI 0000 0004 0628 215X, Department of Plastic and General Surgery, , Turku University Hospital, ; 20520 Turku, Finland
                [5 ]GRID grid.411484.c, ISNI 0000 0001 1033 7158, Department of Biomedicine and Molecular Biology II, , Uniwersytet Medyczny w Lublinie, ; 20-095 Lublin, Poland
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9440-9971
                Article
                562
                10.1007/s13402-020-00562-0
                7907049
                33119860
                3aebbc77-1875-47b4-83db-d6e70f014728
                © The Author(s) 2020

                Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                History
                : 17 September 2020
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100006306, Sigrid Juséliuksen Säätiö;
                Award ID: NA
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100007634, Ida Montinin Säätiö;
                Award ID: NA
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100005877, Luonnontieteiden ja Tekniikan Tutkimuksen Toimikunta;
                Award ID: NA
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100003406, Tekes;
                Award ID: NA
                Categories
                Original Paper
                Custom metadata
                © Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2021

                Oncology & Radiotherapy
                breast cancer,fibroblast growth factor receptor,fibroblast growth factor receptor inhibitor,2d/3d cell culture,explant culture,radio-sensitization

                Comments

                Comment on this article