22
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Developing an Ethically Acceptable Virtual Fencing System for Sheep

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Simple Summary

          Virtual fencing has the potential to be implemented in animal management systems where conventional fencing cannot be applied. Previous work has been conducted on cattle with virtual fencing technology that uses a collar that emits a warning audio when an animal approaches a GPS set boundary. If the animal continues walking towards the boundary an electric stimulus is applied. Less research has been conducted on sheep virtual fencing, so alternatives need to be explored to test the proof of concept on the application of virtual fencing with sheep. Using manually controlled training collars, 30 crossbred sheep were trained to respond to an audio cue in order to avoid receiving a low-level electrical stimulus.

          Abstract

          To ensure animal welfare isn’t compromised when using virtual fencing, animals must be able to associate a benign conditioned stimulus with an aversive stimulus. This study used an associative learning test to train 30, four-year-old, Merino x Suffolk ewes, to associate an audio cue with an electric stimulus. Collars manually controlled by a GPS hand-held unit were used to deliver the audio and electric stimuli cues. For the associative learning, when sheep approached an attractant at a distance of three m from the trough, an audio cue was applied for one s. If the sheep stopped or changed direction, the audio cue ceased immediately and no electrical stimulus was applied. If the sheep did not respond to the audio cue it was followed by a low-level electrical stimulus. Approaches to the attractant significantly decreased from day one to day two. It took a mean of three pairings of the audio cue and electrical stimulus for a change in behaviour to occur, after which sheep that approached the attractant had a 52% probability of avoiding the electrical stimulus and responding to the audio cue alone. Further research is required to determine whether sheep can be trained to associate an audio cue with a negative stimulus for use in group grazing situations.

          Related collections

          Most cited references15

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Performing under pressure: stress and cognitive function

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Training dogs with help of the shock collar: short and long term behavioural effects

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              The evolution of virtual fences: A review

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Animals (Basel)
                Animals (Basel)
                animals
                Animals : an Open Access Journal from MDPI
                MDPI
                2076-2615
                27 February 2018
                March 2018
                : 8
                : 3
                : 33
                Affiliations
                [1 ]School of Environmental and Rural Science, University of New England, Armidale, NSW 2350, Australia; caroline.lee@ 123456csiro.au
                [2 ]Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Agriculture and Food, Locked Bag 1, Armidale NSW 2350, Australia; dmeuleman@ 123456hotmail.com (M.D.M.); Sue.Belson@ 123456csiro.au (S.B.)
                [3 ]Behavioural Ecology Group, Department of Animal Sciences, Wageningen University, 6700 AH Wageningen, The Netherlands
                [4 ]Adaptation Physiology Group, Department of Animal Sciences, Wageningen University, 6700 AH Wageningen, The Netherlands; bas.rodenburg@ 123456wur.nl
                [5 ]Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Agriculture and Food, Locked Bag 2, Glen Osmond, SA 5064, Australia; Rick.Llewellyn@ 123456csiro.au
                Author notes
                [* ]Correspondence: danila.marini@ 123456csiro.au ; Tel.: +612-6776-1482
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1082-6848
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4152-7699
                Article
                animals-08-00033
                10.3390/ani8030033
                5867521
                29495478
                3b136a84-dd86-4531-8a1d-3c2dbec63640
                © 2018 by the authors.

                Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 24 January 2018
                : 26 February 2018
                Categories
                Article

                virtual fencing,technology,welfare,associative learning,sheep management

                Comments

                Comment on this article