14
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Effectiveness, Patient Satisfaction and Cost Reduction of Virtual Joint Replacement Clinic (VJRC) Follow-Up of Hip and Knee Replacement.

      research-article
      , MCh (Orth), PhD (Orth), FRCS (Orth) a , b , , , BSc (Hons) c , , MCh (Orth), PhD (Orth), FRCS (Orth) b , c , , MCh (Orth), PhD (Orth), FRCS (Orth) b , c , , FRCS (Orth) c , , FRCS (Orth) c
      The Journal of Arthroplasty
      Published by Elsevier Inc.
      Virtual clinic, Telemedicine, Arthroplasty, Hip, Knee

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Total hip (THR) and knee (TKR) replacements are increasingly performed operations and routine follow-up places huge demands on orthopedic services. This study investigates the effectiveness, patients’ satisfaction and cost reduction of Virtual Joint Replacement Clinic (VJRC) follow-up of THR and TKR patients in a university hospital. VJRC are especially valuable when in-person appointments are not advised or feasible such as during the COVID-19 pandemic.

          Methods

          1749 patients who were invited for VJRC follow up for knee or hip arthroplasty from January 2017 to December 2018 were included in this retrospective study. Patients were referred to VJRC after their 6-week post-operative review. Routine VJRC postoperative review was undertaken at 1, 7 years and then 3 yearly thereafter. We evaluated the VJRC patient response rate, acceptability and outcome. Patient satisfaction was measured in a subgroup of patients using a satisfaction survey. VJRC costs were calculated compared to face-to-face follow up.

          Results

          The VJRC had a 92.05 % overall response rate. Only 7.22 % required further in-person appointments with only 3% being reviewed by an orthopedic consultant. VJRC resulted in an estimated saving of £43,644 per year at our institution. The patients’ satisfaction survey showed that 89.29% of the patients were either satisfied or very satisfied with VJRC follow-up.

          Conclusions

          VJRC follow-up for hip and knee arthroplasty patients is an effective alternative to in-person clinic assessment which is accepted by patients, has high patient satisfaction and can reduce the cost to both health services and patients.

          Related collections

          Most cited references21

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Global Telemedicine Implementation and Integration Within Health Systems to Fight the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Call to Action

          On March 11, 2020, the World Health Organization declared the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak as a pandemic, with over 720,000 cases reported in more than 203 countries as of 31 March. The response strategy included early diagnosis, patient isolation, symptomatic monitoring of contacts as well as suspected and confirmed cases, and public health quarantine. In this context, telemedicine, particularly video consultations, has been promoted and scaled up to reduce the risk of transmission, especially in the United Kingdom and the United States of America. Based on a literature review, the first conceptual framework for telemedicine implementation during outbreaks was published in 2015. An updated framework for telemedicine in the COVID-19 pandemic has been defined. This framework could be applied at a large scale to improve the national public health response. Most countries, however, lack a regulatory framework to authorize, integrate, and reimburse telemedicine services, including in emergency and outbreak situations. In this context, Italy does not include telemedicine in the essential levels of care granted to all citizens within the National Health Service, while France authorized, reimbursed, and actively promoted the use of telemedicine. Several challenges remain for the global use and integration of telemedicine into the public health response to COVID-19 and future outbreaks. All stakeholders are encouraged to address the challenges and collaborate to promote the safe and evidence-based use of telemedicine during the current pandemic and future outbreaks. For countries without integrated telemedicine in their national health care system, the COVID-19 pandemic is a call to adopt the necessary regulatory frameworks for supporting wide adoption of telemedicine.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The use of the Oxford hip and knee scores.

            The Oxford hip and knee scores have been extensively used since they were first described in 1996 and 1998. During this time, they have been modified and used for many different purposes. This paper describes how they should be used and seeks to clarify areas of confusion.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Meaningful changes for the Oxford hip and knee scores after joint replacement surgery

              Objectives To present estimates of clinically meaningful or minimal important changes for the Oxford Hip Score (OHS) and the Oxford Knee Score (OKS) after joint replacement surgery. Study Design and Setting Secondary data analysis of the NHS patient-reported outcome measures data set that included 82,415 patients listed for hip replacement surgery and 94,015 patients listed for knee replacement surgery was performed. Results Anchor-based methods revealed that meaningful change indices at the group level [minimal important change (MIC)], for example in cohort studies, were ∼11 points for the OHS and ∼9 points for the OKS. For assessment of individual patients, receiver operating characteristic analysis produced MICs of 8 and 7 points for OHS and OKS, respectively. Additionally, the between group minimal important difference (MID), which allows the estimation of a clinically relevant difference in change scores from baseline when comparing two groups, that is, for clinical trials, was estimated to be ∼5 points for both the OKS and the OHS. The distribution-based minimal detectable change (MDC90) estimates for the OKS and OHS were 4 and 5 points, respectively. Conclusion This study has produced and discussed estimates of minimal important change/difference for the OKS/OHS. These estimates should be used in the power calculations and the interpretation of studies using the OKS and OHS. The MDC90 (∼4 points OKS and ∼5 points OHS) represents the smallest possible detectable change for each of these instruments, thus indicating that any lower value would fall within measurement error.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                J Arthroplasty
                J Arthroplasty
                The Journal of Arthroplasty
                Published by Elsevier Inc.
                0883-5403
                1532-8406
                15 August 2020
                15 August 2020
                Affiliations
                [a ]Department of Orthopaedic surgery, Nuffield Orthopaedic centre, Oxford, United Kingdom
                [b ]Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic surgery and Trauma, University of Alexandria, Alexandria, Egypt
                [c ]Department of Orthopaedic surgery, University Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust, Plymouth, United Kingdom
                Author notes
                []Corresponding author: Abd-Allah El Ashmawy, MCh (Orth), PhD (Orth), FRCS (Orth), Department of Orthopaedic surgery, Nuffield Orthopaedic centre, Oxford, United Kingdom , Mobile: 07508128549 a.el-ashmawy@ 123456nhs.net
                Article
                S0883-5403(20)30898-6
                10.1016/j.arth.2020.08.019
                7428443
                32893060
                3c5ab4a6-53c2-42f4-856a-99860d657863
                Crown Copyright © 2020 Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

                Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.

                History
                : 10 June 2020
                : 28 July 2020
                : 10 August 2020
                Categories
                Article

                virtual clinic,telemedicine,arthroplasty,hip,knee
                virtual clinic, telemedicine, arthroplasty, hip, knee

                Comments

                Comment on this article