6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Dismantling Racism: APPD's Commitment to Action

      discussion

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The tragic deaths due to racial injustice and the disproportionate impact COVID-19 has had on communities of color have been a wake-up call that despite our efforts we have still failed to address centuries of racism in our country. Racism has led to healthcare inequities, poor health outcomes, and increased morbidity and mortality for racial and ethnic minorities. 1 , 2 , 3 Racism has led to underrepresentation of learners and faculty who are racial and ethnic minorities 4 , 5 , 6 , unsafe learning environments for our underrepresented in medicine (UIM) learners (those racial and ethnic populations that are underrepresented in the medical profession relative to their numbers in the general population) 7 , and has contributed to the leakiness of the academic pipeline for UIM individuals at all levels. 8 , 9 , 10 As an organization of leaders of pediatric education, the Association of Pediatric Program Directors upholds diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) as core values. We have worked hard to incorporate these values in all that we do. Still we recognize that we have fallen short and there is far more that we can do as an organization to fight structural racism. We have failed to address the lack of UIM individuals in our APPD leadership quickly enough. Only recently did we realize that we do not have certain necessary demographic information about our members, recognizing we cannot aggressively seek out diverse representation if we do not know our current demographics. As Academic Pediatrics is the official journal of the APPD, and in recognition of the journal's internal commitment to address racism in the field of pediatrics 11 , we are using this platform to share the APPD's commitment moving forward to confront racism in six areas. For each of these areas, we have developed tangible goals, timelines, and accountability, and we are committed to sharing our progress with our APPD membership quarterly. Commitment as APPD and Individual Programs to Becoming Anti-Racist We are making a strong commitment as APPD and urging our individual residency and fellowship programs to join us in becoming anti-racist. Anti-racism is not merely the absence of being racist, but rather actively working to dismantle racism in all that we do. We are re-examining all of our activities as an organization to ensure that we are breaking down structural racism in every facet, every project, and every action team. We have re-written our mission statement to more strongly state our commitment to DEI. In addition, we are supporting our students, residents, fellows, and program leadership who advocate against racism. Building a Roadmap for being an Anti-Racist Organization We are dedicated to defining what it means to be anti-racist as an organization and as individual member programs, and then holding ourselves accountable to these metrics. In this process, we will outline steps to becoming anti-racist. We will also compile and create job descriptions for a number of positions of leadership in DEI (Vice Chair of Diversity, Chief Diversity Officer, Associate Program Director dedicated to DEI, Assistant Dean for DEI) to support the hiring practices of institutions and programs. Creating Educational Materials for Teaching Ourselves, Our Faculty, Staff, Residents and Fellows to be Anti-Racist We are committed to creating educational materials to teach ourselves, our faculty, staff, residents, and fellows to be anti-racist. We had already built implicit bias, microaggression, and anti-racism training into our leadership programs (LEAD and LEAPES), and have highlighted this in annual APPD Conferences for the past four years. In addition to building curricula, we have started a monthly Confronting Racism session for our members. We are dedicated to training faculty, staff, residents, and fellows in the history of racism and structural racism and its impacts on children's health, the communities in which children live, and our learning environments. We will work with the ACGME to include anti-racism training in their core requirements for residents, fellows, and faculty development for all specialties and to require that all institutions have policies on anti-discrimination. We will also work with the ABP to include anti-racism content as core content for pediatrics certification and to develop MOC4 credit for faculty working on anti-racism actions in their home institutions. Mentoring and Sponsoring our Underrepresented in Medicine Members In order to improve the disproportionate attrition in academic medicine for UIM individuals, we will develop specific mentorship and sponsorship programs for UIM residency and fellowship program leaders. In addition, we will continue our Advancing Inclusiveness in Medical Education Scholars (AIMS) Program for UIM residents, to help them develop skills and further interest in medical education and academic medicine. Research Confronting Racism We recognize the importance of researching the impact of structural racism on our clinical learning environments and on the retention of UIM individuals. We also recognize that interventions intended to stop the impact of racism in medical education must be studied and properly researched to ensure realization of an intended effect. APPD is committed to supporting these studies through our LEARN Research Network and Special Projects Grants. Working with Other Organizations to Confront Racism to Improve Children's Health, Community Health, and Social Justice We will work with our Pediatric Educational Excellence Across the Continuum partners (AMSPDC, APA, APPD, COMSEP, and CoPS) and Federation of Pediatric Organizations (AAP, ABP, AMSPDC, APA, APPD, APS, and SPR) to support the development of UIM individuals. Recognizing that doing impactful work in DEI takes time and resources, we will work with these organizations to advocate for financial investment in DEI work, including pipeline programs, recruitment efforts, mentoring programs, and educational efforts. We will also encourage economic incentives for individuals doing DEI work to address the minority tax, which is the extra unpaid, uncompensated responsibility placed on faculty and mentors who are racial and ethnic minorities in the name of efforts to achieve diversity. 12 In addition, we are working with the Children's Hospital Association (CHA) to explore looking at quality metrics through a racial and ethnic equity lens. We are committed to ensuring race and ethnicity information is collected in as accurate a manner as possible – through specifically asking patients and parents directly. We are looking at potential inequities in care, including disproportionate involvement of security and Child Protective Service with families of color and inadequate use of interpreters. In addition, we are working with CHA to ensure hospital faculty and staff are trained in racism, implicit bias, and addressing microaggressions. Steps Moving Forward We are committed to continuing to listen, learn, and add additional priority actions to dismantle racism. Sadly, the acts of violence against African Americans and the disproportionate impact of COVID-19 on people of color underscore how much progress remains to be made. We must continue to fight for a just and equitable environment for all and speak out against racism and against structures that create health disparities and inequities for people of color and other marginalized individuals. As pediatricians and as educators, we are acutely aware of how our patients and our trainees struggle with these issues. As we prepare the next generation of pediatricians to provide care for our most vulnerable citizens, we must empower them to be aware, to empathize, and especially to act.

          Related collections

          Most cited references8

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Race, gender, and partnership in the patient-physician relationship.

          Many studies have documented race and gender differences in health care received by patients. However, few studies have related differences in the quality of interpersonal care to patient and physician race and gender. To describe how the race/ethnicity and gender of patients and physicians are associated with physicians' participatory decision-making (PDM) styles. Telephone survey conducted between November 1996 and June 1998 of 1816 adults aged 18 to 65 years (mean age, 41 years) who had recently attended 1 of 32 primary care practices associated with a large mixed-model managed care organization in an urban setting. Sixty-six percent of patients surveyed were female, 43% were white, and 45% were African American. The physician sample (n = 64) was 63% male, with 56% white, and 25% African American. Patients' ratings of their physicians' PDM style on a 100-point scale. African American patients rated their visits as significantly less participatory than whites in models adjusting for patient age, gender, education, marital status, health status, and length of the patient-physician relationship (mean [SE] PDM score, 58.0 [1.2] vs 60.6 [3.3]; P = .03). Ratings of minority and white physicians did not differ with respect to PDM style (adjusted mean [SE] PDM score for African Americans, 59.2 [1.7] vs whites, 61.7 [3.1]; P = .13). Patients in race-concordant relationships with their physicians rated their visits as significantly more participatory than patients in race-discordant relationships (difference [SE], 2.6 [1.1]; P = .02). Patients of female physicians had more participatory visits (adjusted mean [SE] PDM score for female, 62.4 [1.3] vs male, 59.5 [3.1]; P = .03), but gender concordance between physicians and patients was not significantly related to PDM score (unadjusted mean [SE] PDM score, 76.0 [1.0] for concordant vs 74.5 [0.9] for discordant; P = .12). Patient satisfaction was highly associated with PDM score within all race/ethnicity groups. Our data suggest that African American patients rate their visits with physicians as less participatory than whites. However, patients seeing physicians of their own race rate their physicians' decision-making styles as more participatory. Improving cross-cultural communication between primary care physicians and patients and providing patients with access to a diverse group of physicians may lead to more patient involvement in care, higher levels of patient satisfaction, and better health outcomes.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Racism and cardiovascular disease in African Americans.

            This article provides an overview of the evidence on the ways racism can affect the disproportionate rates of cardiovascular disease (CVD) in African Americans. It describes the significant health disparities in CVD for blacks and whites and suggests that racial disparities should be understood within the context of persistent inequities in societal institutions and relations. Evidence and potential pathways for exploring effects of 3 levels of racism on cardiovascular health risk factors and outcomes are reviewed. First, institutional racism can lead to limited opportunities for socioeconomic mobility, differential access to goods and resources, and poor living conditions that can adversely affect cardiovascular health. Second, perceived/personally mediated racism acts as a stressor and can induce psychophysiological reactions that negatively affect cardiovascular health. Third, in race-conscious societies, such as the United States, the negative self-evaluations of accepting negative cultural stereotypes as true (internalized racism) can have deleterious effects on cardiovascular health. Few population-based studies have examined the relationship between racism and CVD. The findings, though suggestive of a positive association, are neither consistent nor clear. The research agenda of the Jackson Heart Study in addressing the role of racism in CVD is presented.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Race, disadvantage and faculty experiences in academic medicine.

              Despite compelling reasons to draw on the contributions of under-represented minority (URM) faculty members, US medical schools lack these faculty, particularly in leadership and senior roles. The study's purpose was to document URM faculty perceptions and experience of the culture of academic medicine in the US and to raise awareness of obstacles to achieving the goal of having people of color in positions of leadership in academic medicine. The authors conducted a qualitative interview study in 2006-2007 of faculty in five US medical schools chosen for their diverse regional and organizational attributes. Using purposeful sampling of medical faculty, 96 faculty were interviewed from four different career stages (early, plateaued, leaders and left academic medicine) and diverse specialties with an oversampling of URM faculty. We identified patterns and themes emergent in the coded data. Analysis was inductive and data driven. Predominant themes underscored during analyses regarding the experience of URM faculty were: difficulty of cross-cultural relationships; isolation and feeling invisible; lack of mentoring, role models and social capital; disrespect, overt and covert bias/discrimination; different performance expectations related to race/ethnicity; devaluing of research on community health care and health disparities; the unfair burden of being identified with affirmative action and responsibility for diversity efforts; leadership's role in diversity goals; and financial hardship. Achieving an inclusive culture for diverse medical school faculty would help meet the mission of academic medicine to train a physician and research workforce that meets the disparate needs of our multicultural society. Medical school leaders need to value the inclusion of URM faculty. Failure to fully engage the skills and insights of URM faculty impairs our ability to provide the best science, education or medical care.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Acad Pediatr
                Acad Pediatr
                Academic Pediatrics
                Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of Academic Pediatric Association
                1876-2859
                1876-2867
                27 August 2020
                27 August 2020
                Affiliations
                [1 ]President of the Association of Pediatric Program Directors and Associate Chair of Education and Clinical Professor, Stanford School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA
                [2 ]President-Elect of the Association of Pediatric Program Directors and Residency Program Director and Assistant Professor at Hasbro Children's Hospital, Brown University
                [3 ]Past President of the Association of Pediatric Program Directors and Associate Chair for Education and Professor at Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine
                [4 ]the Secretary-Treasurer of the APPD and Pediatrics Residency Program Director and Associate Professor at the Oregon Health & Science University
                [5 ]Board Member of the Association of Pediatric Program Directors and Vice Chair of Education, Pediatrics Residency Program Director and Professor at the University of Wisconsin
                [6 ]Board Member of the Association of Pediatric Program Directors and the Pediatrics Residency Program Director and Professor at Seattle Children's Hospital, University of Washington
                [7 ]Board Member of the Association of Pediatric Program Directors and a Pediatrics Residency Associate Program Director and Professor at University of Virginia
                [8 ]the Executive Director of the Association of Pediatric Program Directors
                Author notes
                [* ]Corresponding Author: Rebecca Blankenburg, MD, MPH President of the Association of Pediatric Program Directors and Associate Chair of Education and Clinical Professor, Stanford School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA. 725 Welch Road, Mail Code 5906, Palo Alto, CA 94304, Telephone 650-497-8979; Fax: 650-497-8228 rblanke@ 123456stanford.edu
                Article
                S1876-2859(20)30492-7
                10.1016/j.acap.2020.08.017
                7450251
                32861803
                3cbc2f1c-cf50-4844-aa27-30b84bd0705a
                © 2020 Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of Academic Pediatric Association.

                Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.

                History
                : 15 August 2020
                : 26 August 2020
                Categories
                Article

                Comments

                Comment on this article