25
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Mechanisms underlying brain monitoring during anesthesia: limitations, possible improvements, and perspectives

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Currently, anesthesiologists use clinical parameters to directly measure the depth of anesthesia (DoA). This clinical standard of monitoring is often combined with brain monitoring for better assessment of the hypnotic component of anesthesia. Brain monitoring devices provide indices allowing for an immediate assessment of the impact of anesthetics on consciousness. However, questions remain regarding the mechanisms underpinning these indices of hypnosis. By briefly describing current knowledge of the brain's electrical activity during general anesthesia, as well as the operating principles of DoA monitors, the aim of this work is to simplify our understanding of the mathematical processes that allow for translation of complex patterns of brain electrical activity into dimensionless indices. This is a challenging task because mathematical concepts appear remote from clinical practice. Moreover, most DoA algorithms are proprietary algorithms and the difficulty of exploring the inner workings of mathematical models represents an obstacle to accurate simplification. The limitations of current DoA monitors — and the possibility for improvement — as well as perspectives on brain monitoring derived from recent research on corticocortical connectivity and communication are also discussed.

          Related collections

          Most cited references57

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          General anesthesia, sleep, and coma.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Electroencephalogram signatures of loss and recovery of consciousness from propofol.

            Unconsciousness is a fundamental component of general anesthesia (GA), but anesthesiologists have no reliable ways to be certain that a patient is unconscious. To develop EEG signatures that track loss and recovery of consciousness under GA, we recorded high-density EEGs in humans during gradual induction of and emergence from unconsciousness with propofol. The subjects executed an auditory task at 4-s intervals consisting of interleaved verbal and click stimuli to identify loss and recovery of consciousness. During induction, subjects lost responsiveness to the less salient clicks before losing responsiveness to the more salient verbal stimuli; during emergence they recovered responsiveness to the verbal stimuli before recovering responsiveness to the clicks. The median frequency and bandwidth of the frontal EEG power tracked the probability of response to the verbal stimuli during the transitions in consciousness. Loss of consciousness was marked simultaneously by an increase in low-frequency EEG power (<1 Hz), the loss of spatially coherent occipital alpha oscillations (8-12 Hz), and the appearance of spatially coherent frontal alpha oscillations. These dynamics reversed with recovery of consciousness. The low-frequency phase modulated alpha amplitude in two distinct patterns. During profound unconsciousness, alpha amplitudes were maximal at low-frequency peaks, whereas during the transition into and out of unconsciousness, alpha amplitudes were maximal at low-frequency nadirs. This latter phase-amplitude relationship predicted recovery of consciousness. Our results provide insights into the mechanisms of propofol-induced unconsciousness, establish EEG signatures of this brain state that track transitions in consciousness precisely, and suggest strategies for monitoring the brain activity of patients receiving GA.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              A primer for EEG signal processing in anesthesia.

              I J Rampil (1998)
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Korean J Anesthesiol
                Korean J Anesthesiol
                KJAE
                Korean Journal of Anesthesiology
                The Korean Society of Anesthesiologists
                2005-6419
                2005-7563
                April 2016
                30 March 2016
                : 69
                : 2
                : 113-120
                Affiliations
                Department of Anesthesia, Endoscopy and Cardiology, National Cancer Institute 'G Pascale' Foundation, Naples, Italy.
                Author notes
                Corresponding author: Marco Cascella, M.D. Department of Anesthesia, Endoscopy and Cardiology, National Cancer Institute 'G Pascale' Foundation, Via Mariano Semmola, 162, Naples 80131, Italy. Tel: 39-081-5903586, Fax: 39-081-5903778, m.cascella@ 123456istitutotumori.na.it
                Article
                10.4097/kjae.2016.69.2.113
                4823404
                27066200
                3d39f5d1-0f51-4219-9cb7-81e01cf4a423
                Copyright © the Korean Society of Anesthesiologists, 2016

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 16 November 2015
                : 13 December 2015
                : 31 December 2015
                Categories
                Review Article

                Anesthesiology & Pain management
                electroencephalography,intraoperative awareness,intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring

                Comments

                Comment on this article