4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Comparison of pre and post Foley catheter Bishop’s Score: A retrospective record review at Aga Khan University Hospital Karachi, Pakistan

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective:

          To compare pre and post Foley’s catheter Bishop Score during labour induction.

          Methods:

          This study was a retrospective study conducted at the Aga Khan University Hospital Karachi, Pakistan after approval from ethical review board. All women who underwent induction of labour with Foley’s Catheter at gestation of 37 weeks or more from September 2014-October 2015 were included. Data was entered and analyzed in Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 19.0. The comparison between pre and post Foley’s catheter Bishop Score during labour induction will be calculated by Wilcoxon sign test.

          Results:

          There were 981 cases of inductions of labour, 749 (76.3%) received Foley’s catheter, in combination with prostaglandins and oxytocin. About 68% were vaginal deliveries while 32% underwent C-section. Two third of women had bishop <4. Overall, Bishop score improved significantly in all patients with the catheter however, maximum benefit was seen in patients where the catheter was placed for 10-12 hours.

          Conclusion:

          Foley’s is the better and safer option. In view of our results, It has been recommended to keep the Foley’s for 10-12 hours to get significant improvement in bishop score.

          Related collections

          Most cited references18

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Factors associated with failed induction of labour in a secondary care hospital.

          To assess the factors associated with failed induction of labour (IOL) in a secondary care hospital.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Inpatient versus outpatient induction of labour: a systematic review and meta-analysis

            Background As the number of indications for labour induction continue to increase, the focus has shifted to performing these procedures in an outpatient setting. This study aims to systematically review published data from randomized controlled trials that compare outpatient with inpatient labour induction, to ascertain the role of outpatient labour induction for low-risk pregnancies. Methods We conducted a systematic review wherein we searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Biosis Previews®, and International Pharmaceutical Abstracts from inception to January 2020 to identify randomized controlled trials that reported on maternal, fetal and resource-related outcomes following outpatient versus inpatient labour induction. Pooled incidences and mean differences were calculated using random-effects meta-analysis. Risk-of-bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. Subgroup analysis was conducted based on the method of induction. Results Of the 588 records identified, 12 publications, representing nine independent randomized controlled trials conducted in Australia, Europe and North America, were included. These reported on 2615 cases of labour induction (1320 outpatients versus 1295 inpatients). Overall, apart from a higher number of suspicious fetal heart rate tracings [RR = 1.43 (1.10, 1.86)] and a shorter mean length of hospital stay [MD = 282.48 min (160.23, 404.73) shorter] in the outpatient group, there were no differences in delivery method, adverse outcomes or resource-use between the two arms. On subgroup analysis, when comparing the use of balloon catheters in both arms, those induced as outpatients had fewer caesarean deliveries [RR = 0.52 (0.30, 0.90)], a shorter admission-to-delivery interval [MD = 370.86 min (19.19, 722.54) shorter], and a shorter induction to delivery interval [MD = 330.42 min (120.13, 540.71) shorter]. Conclusion Outpatient labour induction in resource-rich settings is at least as effective and safe, in carefully selected patient populations, when compared with inpatient labour induction. Whether outpatient labour induction results in lower rates of caesarean deliveries needs to be explored further. Trial registration This systematic review was prospectively registered in Prospero (CRD42019118049).
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              A randomized controlled trial of Dilapan-S vs Foley balloon for preinduction cervical ripening (DILAFOL trial)

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Pak J Med Sci
                Pak J Med Sci
                Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences
                Professional Medical Publications (Pakistan )
                1682-024X
                1681-715X
                Jan-Feb 2024
                : 40
                : 1Part-I
                : 73-77
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Ayesha Malik, MRCOG, FCPS Assistant Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan
                [2 ]Sheikh Irfan, MBBS, MPH,MHP,PhD Assistant Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan
                [3 ]Farheen Yousuf, FRCOG, MCPS(HPE), FCPS Assistant Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan
                [4 ]Azra Amerjee, FCPS Assistant Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan
                [5 ]Sumaira Naz, FCPS Senior Instructor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan
                [6 ]Safna Virji Resident, Department of General Surgery, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan
                Author notes
                Correspondence: Dr. Farheen Yousuf, FRCOG, MCPS(HPE), FCPS Assistant Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan. Email: Farheen.yousuf@ 123456aku.edu
                Article
                PJMS-40-73
                10.12669/pjms.40.1.7433
                10772453
                3d61875d-8b2a-48f5-9b73-bf588769e43f
                Copyright: © Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 03 December 2022
                : 07 February 2023
                : 17 August 2023
                : 30 August 2023
                Categories
                Original Article

                foley’s catheter,induction,labor,prostaglandin e2,cervical ripening,bishop score

                Comments

                Comment on this article