0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Spanish validation of the short version of the racing and crowded thoughts questionnaire (RCTQ-13)

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          The Racing and Crowded Thoughts Questionnaire (RCTQ-13) is the most widely used specific scale for the measurement of racing thoughts, but there is currently no Spanish version that allow the evaluation in Spanish-speaking patients. The objective of this study is to translate, adapt, and validate the RCTQ-13 in a Colombian population with affective disorders.

          Methods

          The questionnaire was translated and back-translated, and corrections were implemented following a pilot test to improve comprehensibility. We included patients with Bipolar I Disorder and with Major depressive disorder seen in three centers in the city of Medellín, Colombia. We evaluate structural validity with confirmatory factor analysis, internal consistency, and test-retest reliability. Construct validity was also assessed with the comparison between euthymic, maniac, and depressive episodes and the correlation with worry, rumination, and mania scales. Responsiveness was measured 1 month after the first evaluation. Based on item response theory (IRT), we also estimated item difficulty, discrimination, and fit using a generalized partial credit model.

          Results

          Two hundred fifty subjects were included. Confirmatory factor analysis revealed that the three-factor structure of the scale was appropriate. Internal consistency was adequate for the entire scale (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.95, 95% CI: 0.94-0.96) and for each factor. Test-retest reliability was good (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.82, 95%IC: 0.70-0.88). For construct validity, we observed differences between patients with different types of affective episodes, a moderate positive correlation with the Penn State Worry Scale (r = 0.55) and the Ruminative Response Scale (r = 0.42), and a low negative correlation with the Young Mania Rating Scale (r = − 0.10). Responsiveness was proved to be adequate. Under IRT, the response thresholds for the response options are organized for all items. The infit was adequate for all items and the outfit was acceptable.

          Conclusions

          The Spanish version of the RCTQ-13 is a reliable, valid, and responsive scale and can be used for the clinical assessment of the construct of racing and crowded thoughts in patients with the spectrum of affective disorders in whom this experience can be expressed with different nuances. Further research is needed to expand the relationship with rumination and worry.

          Supplementary Information

          The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12888-024-05618-1.

          Related collections

          Most cited references41

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            lavaan: AnRPackage for Structural Equation Modeling

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.

              A representation and interpretation of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve obtained by the "rating" method, or by mathematical predictions based on patient characteristics, is presented. It is shown that in such a setting the area represents the probability that a randomly chosen diseased subject is (correctly) rated or ranked with greater suspicion than a randomly chosen non-diseased subject. Moreover, this probability of a correct ranking is the same quantity that is estimated by the already well-studied nonparametric Wilcoxon statistic. These two relationships are exploited to (a) provide rapid closed-form expressions for the approximate magnitude of the sampling variability, i.e., standard error that one uses to accompany the area under a smoothed ROC curve, (b) guide in determining the size of the sample required to provide a sufficiently reliable estimate of this area, and (c) determine how large sample sizes should be to ensure that one can statistically detect differences in the accuracy of diagnostic techniques.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                juanp.zapata@udea.edu.co
                Journal
                BMC Psychiatry
                BMC Psychiatry
                BMC Psychiatry
                BioMed Central (London )
                1471-244X
                19 March 2024
                19 March 2024
                2024
                : 24
                : 214
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Psychiatry, University of Antioquia, ( https://ror.org/03bp5hc83) Medellin, Colombia
                [2 ]Institute of Medical Research, University of Antioquia, ( https://ror.org/03bp5hc83) Medellin, Colombia
                [3 ]Hospital Mental de Antioquia, Bello, Colombia
                [4 ]Hospital Alma Máter de Antioquia, Medellin, Colombia
                [5 ]Hospital San Vicente Fundacion, Medellin, Colombia
                [6 ]Institute of Medical Research, University of Antioquia, ( https://ror.org/03bp5hc83) Medellin, Colombia
                [7 ]Department of Psychiatry, University of Antioquia, ( https://ror.org/03bp5hc83) Medellin, Colombia
                [8 ]Department of Psychiatry, University of Antioquia, ( https://ror.org/03bp5hc83) Medellin, Colombia
                Article
                5618
                10.1186/s12888-024-05618-1
                10953190
                38504212
                3d7a7718-602a-4bae-a766-e372f7f8a5c7
                © The Author(s) 2024

                Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

                History
                : 1 July 2023
                : 15 February 2024
                Categories
                Research
                Custom metadata
                © BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2024

                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                racing and crowded thoughts,thinking,psychopathology,bipolar disorder,depressive disorder,anxiety,psychometrics

                Comments

                Comment on this article