7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
2 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The long-term effects of consecutive COVID-19 waves on mental health

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Although several studies have documented the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on mental health, the long-term effects remain unclear.

          Aims

          To examine longitudinal changes in mental health before and during the consecutive COVID-19 waves in a well-established probability sample.

          Method

          An online survey was completed by the participants of the COVID-19 add-on study at four time points: pre-COVID-19 period (2014–2015, n = 1823), first COVID-19 wave (April to May 2020, n = 788), second COVID-19 wave (August to October 2020, n = 532) and third COVID-19 wave (March to April 2021, n = 383). Data were collected via a set of validated instruments, and analysed with latent growth models.

          Results

          During the pandemic, we observed a significant increase in stress levels (standardised β = 0.473, P < 0.001) and depressive symptoms (standardised β = 1.284, P < 0.001). The rate of increase in depressive symptoms (std. covariance = 0.784, P = 0.014), but not in stress levels (std. covariance = 0.057, P = 0.743), was associated with the pre-pandemic mental health status of the participants. Further analysis showed that secondary stressors played a predominant role in the increase in mental health difficulties. The main secondary stressors were loneliness, negative emotionality associated with the perception of COVID-19 disease, lack of resilience, female gender and younger age.

          Conclusions

          The surge in stress levels and depressive symptoms persisted across all three consecutive COVID-19 waves. This persistence is attributable to the effects of secondary stressors, and particularly to the status of mental health before the COVID-19 pandemic. Our findings reveal mechanisms underlying the surge in mental health difficulties during the COVID-19 waves, with direct implications for strategies promoting mental health during pandemics.

          Related collections

          Most cited references57

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests

          Psychometrika, 16(3), 297-334
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies.

            Much biomedical research is observational. The reporting of such research is often inadequate, which hampers the assessment of its strengths and weaknesses and of a study's generalisability. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) initiative developed recommendations on what should be included in an accurate and complete report of an observational study. We defined the scope of the recommendations to cover three main study designs: cohort, case-control, and cross-sectional studies. We convened a 2-day workshop in September, 2004, with methodologists, researchers, and journal editors to draft a checklist of items. This list was subsequently revised during several meetings of the coordinating group and in e-mail discussions with the larger group of STROBE contributors, taking into account empirical evidence and methodological considerations. The workshop and the subsequent iterative process of consultation and revision resulted in a checklist of 22 items (the STROBE statement) that relate to the title, abstract, introduction, methods, results, and discussion sections of articles.18 items are common to all three study designs and four are specific for cohort, case-control, or cross-sectional studies.A detailed explanation and elaboration document is published separately and is freely available on the websites of PLoS Medicine, Annals of Internal Medicine, and Epidemiology. We hope that the STROBE statement will contribute to improving the quality of reporting of observational studies
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              A Short Scale for Measuring Loneliness in Large Surveys: Results From Two Population-Based Studies.

              Most studies of social relationships in later life focus on the amount of social contact, not on individuals' perceptions of social isolation. However, loneliness is likely to be an important aspect of aging. A major limiting factor in studying loneliness has been the lack of a measure suitable for large-scale social surveys. This article describes a short loneliness scale developed specifically for use on a telephone survey. The scale has three items and a simplified set of response categories but appears to measure overall loneliness quite well. The authors also document the relationship between loneliness and several commonly used measures of objective social isolation. As expected, they find that objective and subjective isolation are related. However, the relationship is relatively modest, indicating that the quantitative and qualitative aspects of social relationships are distinct. This result suggests the importance of studying both dimensions of social relationships in the aging process.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                BJPsych Open
                BJPsych Open
                BJO
                BJPsych Open
                Cambridge University Press (Cambridge, UK )
                2056-4724
                January 2024
                19 December 2023
                : 10
                : 1
                : e15
                Affiliations
                [1]Institute for Molecular and Translational Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacký University Olomouc , Czech Republic
                [2]International Clinical Research Centre, St. Anne's University Hospital Brno , Czech Republic; and Department of Global Health and Population, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Harvard University , USA
                [3]International Clinical Research Centre, St. Anne's University Hospital Brno , Czech Republic
                [4]International Clinical Research Centre, St. Anne's University Hospital Brno , Czech Republic; and Second Department of Internal Medicine, St. Anne's University Hospital Brno and Masaryk University , Brno, Czech Republic
                [5]International Clinical Research Centre, St. Anne's University Hospital Brno , Czech Republic; and Research Centre for Toxic Compounds in the Environment (RECETOX), Masaryk University , Brno, Czech Republic
                [6]Division of Epidemiology, Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic , Rochester, Minnesota, USA
                [7]Division of Preventive Cardiology, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic , Rochester, Minnesota, USA; and Marriot Heart Disease Research Program, Mayo Clinic , Rochester, Minnesota, USA
                [8]Division of Preventive Cardiology, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic , Rochester, Minnesota, USA
                [9]Department of Neurology, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, Arizona, USA; and Franke Global Neuroscience Education Center, Barrow Neurological Institute , Phoenix, Arizona, USA
                [10]Institute for Molecular and Translational Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacký University Olomouc , Czech Republic; and Department of Neurology, Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust , Gloucester, UK
                Author notes
                Correspondence: Gorazd Bernard Stokin. Email: gbstokin@ 123456alumni.ucsd.edu
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5074-8971
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8430-8755
                Article
                S2056472423006208
                10.1192/bjo.2023.620
                10755548
                38111960
                3dc92951-0534-4d4c-875d-b18df9f7dc25
                © The Author(s) 2023

                This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.

                History
                : 09 December 2021
                : 29 October 2023
                : 03 November 2023
                Page count
                Figures: 4, Tables: 3, References: 57, Pages: 11
                Funding
                Funded by: European Commission, doi http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000780;
                Award ID: CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/15_003/0000492
                Funded by: European Commission, doi http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000780;
                Award ID: CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/16_019/0000868
                Funded by: Barrow Neurological Foundation, doi http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100009797;
                Categories
                General Adult
                Paper

                covid-19,longitudinal,stress levels,depressive symptoms,stressors

                Comments

                Comment on this article