42
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Sexual function in women with female genital mutilation

      ,
      Fertility and Sterility
      Elsevier BV

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          To compare the sexual function of women with female genital mutilation (FGM) to women without FGM. A prospective case-control study. A tertiary referral university hospital. One hundred and thirty sexually active women with FGM and 130 sexually active women without FGM in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. Women with and without FGM were asked to answer the Arabic-translated version of the female sexual function index (FSFI) questionnaire. The individual domain scores for pain, arousal, lubrication, orgasm, satisfaction, pain, and overall score of the FSFI were calculated. The two groups were comparable in demographic characteristics. There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in mean desire score (+/- standard deviation) or pain score. However, there were statistically significant differences between the two groups in their scores for arousal, lubrication, orgasm, and satisfaction as well as the overall score. Sexual function in women with FGM is adversely altered. This adds to the well-known health consequences of FGM. Efforts to document and explain these complications should be encouraged so that FGM can be abandoned. Copyright 2010 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Fertility and Sterility
          Fertility and Sterility
          Elsevier BV
          00150282
          February 2010
          February 2010
          : 93
          : 3
          : 722-724
          Article
          10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.10.035
          19028385
          3dd6f263-e7b7-48f0-80a4-1b2d784ac98a
          © 2010

          https://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/

          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article