21
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Assessment of genetically modified maize 1507 × NK603 for renewal of authorisation under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA‐GMO‐RX‐008)

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Following the submission of application EFSAGMORX‐008 under Regulation ( EC) No 1829/2003 from Pioneer Hi‐Bred International, Inc. and Dow AgroSciences LLC, the Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms of the European Food Safety Authority was asked to deliver a scientific risk assessment on the data submitted in the context of the renewal of authorisation application for the insect‐resistant, herbicide‐tolerant genetically modified maize 1507 ×  NK603, for food and feed uses, import and processing, excluding cultivation within the EU. The data received in the context of this renewal application contained a systematic search and evaluation of literature, updated bioinformatic analyses and additional documents or studies performed by or on behalf of the applicant. The GMO Panel assessed these data for possible new hazards, modified exposure or new scientific uncertainties identified during the authorisation period and not previously assessed in the context of the original application. In conclusion, under the assumption that the DNA sequence of the events in maize 1507 ×  NK603 considered for renewal are identical to the newly reported 1507 sequence and the NK603 sequence of the originally assessed two‐event stack maize, the GMO Panel concludes that there is no evidence in the renewal application EFSAGMORX‐008 for new hazards, modified exposure or scientific uncertainties that would change the conclusions of the original risk assessment on maize 1507 × NK603 ( EFSA, 2006).

          Related collections

          Most cited references6

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Guidance for renewal applications of genetically modified food and feed authorised under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Scientific opinion on an application for renewal of authorisation for continued marketing of maize 1507 and derived food and feed submitted under Articles 11 and 23 of Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 by Pioneer Overseas Corporation and Dow AgroSciences LLC

            Abstract Following the submission of application EFSA‐GMO‐RX‐001 under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 from Pioneer Overseas Corporation and Dow Agrosciences LLC, the Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms of the European Food Safety Authority (GMO Panel) was asked to deliver a scientific risk assessment on the data submitted in the frame of a renewal of authorisation application of the insect‐resistant and herbicide‐tolerant genetically modified (GM) maize 1507. The data package received in the frame of this renewal application contained post‐market environmental monitoring reports, a systematic search and evaluation of literature, an updated bioinformatics analysis and additional documents or studies performed by or on behalf of the applicant. The GMO Panel assessed this data package for possible new hazards, modified exposure or new scientific uncertainties identified during the authorisation period and not previously assessed in the frame of the original application. Under the assumption that the DNA sequence of the event in maize 1507 considered for renewal is identical to the corrected sequence of the originally assessed event, the GMO Panel concludes that no new hazards or modified exposure and no new scientific uncertainties were identified for the application for renewal that would change the conclusions of the original risk assessment on maize 1507 (EFSA, 2005b, 2009).
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Scientific Opinion on application EFSA ‐ GMO ‐ BE ‐2013‐117 for authorisation of genetically modified maize MON  87427 ×  MON  89034 ×  NK 603 and subcombinations independently of their origin, for food and feed uses, import and processing submitted under Regulation ( EC ) No 1829/2003 by Monsanto Company

              Abstract In this opinion, the EFSA Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO Panel) assessed the three‐event stack maize MON 87427 × MON 89034 × NK603 and its three subcombinations, independently of their origin. The GMO Panel has previously assessed the three single events combined to produce this three‐event stack maize and did not identify safety concerns. No new data on the single events, leading to modification of the original conclusions on their safety, were identified. Based on the molecular, agronomic, phenotypic and compositional characteristics, the combination of the single maize events and of the newly expressed proteins in the three‐event stack maize did not give rise to issues regarding food and feed safety or nutrition. In the case of accidental release of viable grains of maize MON 87427 × MON 89034 × NK603 into the environment, the three‐event stack maize would not raise environmental safety concerns. The GMO Panel concludes that the three‐event stack maize is as safe and as nutritious as the non‐GM comparator and the tested non‐GM reference varieties in the context of its scope. The GMO Panel considered that its previous conclusions on the two‐event stack maize MON 89034 × NK603 remain valid. For the two maize subcombinations for which no experimental data were provided the GMO Panel assessed the likelihood of interactions among the single events, and concluded that their combination would not raise safety concerns. These two subcombinations are therefore expected to be as safe as the single events, the previously assessed maize MON 89034 × NK603 and maize MON 87427 × MON 89034 × NK603. Since the post‐market environmental monitoring plan for the three‐event stack maize does not include any provisions for the two subcombinations not previously assessed, the GMO Panel recommended the applicant to revise the plan accordingly.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                EFSA J
                EFSA J
                10.1002/(ISSN)1831-4732
                EFS2
                EFSA Journal
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                1831-4732
                25 July 2018
                July 2018
                : 16
                : 7 ( doiID: 10.1002/efs2.2018.16.issue-7 )
                : e05347
                Author notes
                [*] Correspondence: GMO@ 123456efsa.europa.eu
                Article
                EFS25347
                10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5347
                7009699
                3e04f75f-08c2-4eba-ba5d-948e278fd1d8
                © 2018 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd on behalf of European Food Safety Authority.

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and no modifications or adaptations are made.

                History
                Page count
                Figures: 0, Tables: 0, Pages: 11, Words: 4651
                Categories
                Gmo
                Scientific Opinion
                Scientific Opinion
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                July 2018
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:5.7.5 mode:remove_FC converted:21.01.2020

                maize,1507 × nk603,renewal,articles 11 and 23,regulation (ec) no 1829/2003

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_

                Similar content68

                Cited by3