14
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Pain and reward circuits antagonistically modulate alcohol expectancy to regulate drinking

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Expectancy of physical and social pleasure (PSP) promotes excessive drinking despite the potential aversive effects of misuse, suggesting an imbalance in the response to reward and pain in alcohol seeking. Here, we investigated the competing roles of the reward and pain circuits in PSP expectancy and problem drinking in humans. Using fMRI data during resting ( n = 180) and during alcohol cue exposure ( n = 71), we examined the antagonistic effects of the reward-related medial orbitofrontal cortex (mOFC) and pain-related periaqueductal gray (PAG) connectivities on PSP expectancy and drinking severity. The two regions’ connectivity maps and strengths were characterized to assess their shared substrates and net relationship with PSP expectancy. We evaluated mediation and path models to further delineate how mOFC and PAG connectivities interacted through the shared substrates to differentially impact expectancy and alcohol use. During resting, whole-brain regressions showed mOFC connectivity in positive and PAG connectivity in negative association with PSP scores, with convergence in the precentral gyrus (PrCG). Notably, greater PAG-PrCG relative to mOFC-PrCG connectivity strength predicted lower PSP expectancy. During the alcohol cue exposure task, the net strength of the PAG vs. mOFC cue-elicited connectivity with the occipital cortex again negatively predicted PSP expectancy. Finally, mediation and path models revealed that the PAG and mOFC connectivities indirectly and antagonistically modulated problem drinking via their opposing influences on expectancy and craving. Thus, the pain and reward circuits exhibit functional antagonism such that the mOFC connectivity increases expectancy of drinking pleasure whereas the PAG serves to counter that effect.

          Related collections

          Most cited references59

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The neural basis of drug craving: an incentive-sensitization theory of addiction.

          This paper presents a biopsychological theory of drug addiction, the 'Incentive-Sensitization Theory'. The theory addresses three fundamental questions. The first is: why do addicts crave drugs? That is, what is the psychological and neurobiological basis of drug craving? The second is: why does drug craving persist even after long periods of abstinence? The third is whether 'wanting' drugs (drug craving) is attributable to 'liking' drugs (to the subjective pleasurable effects of drugs)? The theory posits the following. (1) Addictive drugs share the ability to enhance mesotelencephalic dopamine neurotransmission. (2) One psychological function of this neural system is to attribute 'incentive salience' to the perception and mental representation of events associated with activation of the system. Incentive salience is a psychological process that transforms the perception of stimuli, imbuing them with salience, making them attractive, 'wanted', incentive stimuli. (3) In some individuals the repeated use of addictive drugs produces incremental neuroadaptations in this neural system, rendering it increasingly and perhaps permanently, hypersensitive ('sensitized') to drugs and drug-associated stimuli. The sensitization of dopamine systems is gated by associative learning, which causes excessive incentive salience to be attributed to the act of drug taking and to stimuli associated with drug taking. It is specifically the sensitization of incentive salience, therefore, that transforms ordinary 'wanting' into excessive drug craving. (4) It is further proposed that sensitization of the neural systems responsible for incentive salience ('for wanting') can occur independently of changes in neural systems that mediate the subjective pleasurable effects of drugs (drug 'liking') and of neural systems that mediate withdrawal. Thus, sensitization of incentive salience can produce addictive behavior (compulsive drug seeking and drug taking) even if the expectation of drug pleasure or the aversive properties of withdrawal are diminished and even in the face of strong disincentives, including the loss of reputation, job, home and family. We review evidence for this view of addiction and discuss its implications for understanding the psychology and neurobiology of addiction.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            A motivational model of alcohol use.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Functional neuroimaging studies of alcohol cue reactivity: a quantitative meta-analysis and systematic review.

              A comprehensive understanding of the neurobiology of alcohol cue reactivity is critical in identifying the neuropathology of alcohol use disorders (AUD) and developing treatments that may attenuate alcohol craving and reduce relapse risk. Functional neuroimaging studies have identified many brain areas in which alcohol cues elicit activation. However, extant studies have included relatively small numbers of cases, with AUD of varying severity, and have employed many different cue paradigms. We used activation likelihood estimation, a quantitative, coordinate-based meta-analytic method, to analyze the brain areas activated by alcohol-related cues across studies, and to examine whether these areas were differentially activated between cases and controls. Secondarily, we reviewed correlations between behavioral measures and cue-elicited activation, as well as treatment effects on such activation. Data analyzed were from 28 studies of 679 cases and 174 controls. Among cases, alcohol cues elicited robust activation of limbic and prefrontal regions, including ventral striatum, anterior cingulate and ventromedial prefrontal cortex. As compared to controls, cases demonstrated greater activation of parietal and temporal regions, including posterior cingulate, precuneus and superior temporal gyrus. Cue-elicited activation of ventral striatum was most frequently correlated with behavioral measures and most frequently reduced by treatment, but these results were often derived from region-of-interest analyses that interrogated only limbic regions. These findings support long-standing theories of mesolimbic involvement in alcohol cue processing, but suggest that cue-elicited activation of other brain areas may more clearly differentiate cases from controls. Prevention and treatment for AUD should consider interventions that may reduce cue-elicited activation of these areas. © 2012 The Authors. Addiction Biology © 2012 Society for the Study of Addiction.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                thang.le@yale.edu
                Journal
                Transl Psychiatry
                Transl Psychiatry
                Translational Psychiatry
                Nature Publishing Group UK (London )
                2158-3188
                7 July 2020
                7 July 2020
                2020
                : 10
                : 220
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.47100.32, ISNI 0000000419368710, Department of Psychiatry, , Yale University School of Medicine, ; New Haven, CT 06519 USA
                [2 ]GRID grid.47100.32, ISNI 0000000419368710, Department of Neuroscience, , Yale University School of Medicine, ; New Haven, CT 06520 USA
                [3 ]GRID grid.47100.32, ISNI 0000000419368710, Interdepartmental Neuroscience Program, , Yale University School of Medicine, ; New Haven, CT 06520 USA
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4196-8646
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5786-6516
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9393-1212
                Article
                909
                10.1038/s41398-020-00909-z
                7341762
                32636394
                3e6aec98-91dd-42c4-94a8-cae648a89546
                © The Author(s) 2020

                Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                History
                : 8 April 2020
                : 11 June 2020
                : 23 June 2020
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef https://doi.org/10.13039/100000002, U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | National Institutes of Health (NIH);
                Award ID: AA021449
                Award Recipient :
                Categories
                Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2020

                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                neuroscience,diagnostic markers
                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                neuroscience, diagnostic markers

                Comments

                Comment on this article