10
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Predicting recidivism among youth offenders: Augmenting professional judgement with machine learning algorithms

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Summary

          Offender rehabilitation seeks to minimise recidivism. Using their experience and actuarial-type risk assessment tools, probation officers in Singapore make recommendations on the sentencing outcomes so as to achieve this objective. However, it is difficult for them to maximise the utility of the large amounts of data collected, which could be resolved by using predictive modelling informed by statistical learning methods.

          Findings

          Data of youth offenders ( N = 3744) referred to the Probation Service, Ministry of Social and Family Development for rehabilitation were used to create a random forests model to predict recidivism. No assumptions were made on how individual predictor values within the risk assessment tool and other administrative data on an individual’s socio-economic status such as level of education attained and dwelling type collected in line with organisational requirements influenced the outcome. Sixty per cent of the data was used to develop the model, which was then tested against the remaining 40%. With a classification accuracy of approximately 65%, and an Area under the Curve value of 0.69, it outperformed existing models analysing aggregated data using conventional statistical methods.

          Application

          This article identifies how analysis of administrative data at the discrete level using statistical learning methods is more accurate in predicting recidivism than using conventional statistical methods. This provides an opportunity to direct intervention efforts at individuals who are more likely to reoffend.

          Related collections

          Most cited references37

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          ROCR: visualizing classifier performance in R.

          ROCR is a package for evaluating and visualizing the performance of scoring classifiers in the statistical language R. It features over 25 performance measures that can be freely combined to create two-dimensional performance curves. Standard methods for investigating trade-offs between specific performance measures are available within a uniform framework, including receiver operating characteristic (ROC) graphs, precision/recall plots, lift charts and cost curves. ROCR integrates tightly with R's powerful graphics capabilities, thus allowing for highly adjustable plots. Being equipped with only three commands and reasonable default values for optional parameters, ROCR combines flexibility with ease of usage. http://rocr.bioinf.mpi-sb.mpg.de. ROCR can be used under the terms of the GNU General Public License. Running within R, it is platform-independent. tobias.sing@mpi-sb.mpg.de.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            RANDOM FORESTS FOR CLASSIFICATION IN ECOLOGY

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Clinical versus mechanical prediction: a meta-analysis.

              The process of making judgments and decisions requires a method for combining data. To compare the accuracy of clinical and mechanical (formal, statistical) data-combination techniques, we performed a meta-analysis on studies of human health and behavior. On average, mechanical-prediction techniques were about 10% more accurate than clinical predictions. Depending on the specific analysis, mechanical prediction substantially outperformed clinical prediction in 33%-47% of studies examined. Although clinical predictions were often as accurate as mechanical predictions, in only a few studies (6%-16%) were they substantially more accurate. Superiority for mechanical-prediction techniques was consistent, regardless of the judgment task, type of judges, judges' amounts of experience, or the types of data being combined. Clinical predictions performed relatively less well when predictors included clinical interview data. These data indicate that mechanical predictions of human behaviors are equal or superior to clinical prediction methods for a wide range of circumstances.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                J Soc Work (Lond)
                J Soc Work (Lond)
                JSW
                spjsw
                Journal of Social Work (London, England)
                SAGE Publications (Sage UK: London, England )
                1468-0173
                1741-296X
                27 December 2017
                November 2018
                : 18
                : 6
                : 631-649
                Affiliations
                [1-1468017317743137]Centre for Research on Rehabilitation and Protection, Singapore
                Author notes
                [*]Ming Hwa Ting, Centre for Research on Rehabilitation and Protection, Ministry of Social and Family Development, 512 Thomson Road, #12-00 MSF Building, Singapore 298136, Singapore. Email: ting_ming_hwa@ 123456msf.gov.sg
                Article
                10.1177_1468017317743137
                10.1177/1468017317743137
                6210571
                30473627
                3e7c84b6-a0b2-4c72-ad0b-883a30001b04
                © The Author(s) 2017

                This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License ( http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages ( https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).

                History
                Categories
                Articles

                social work,youth offending,recidivism,quantitative research,heuristics,statistical learning methods,singapore

                Comments

                Comment on this article