18
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      A Test for the Assessment of Pragmatic Abilities and Cognitive Substrates (APACS): Normative Data and Psychometric Properties

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The Assessment of Pragmatic Abilities and Cognitive Substrates (APACS) test is a new tool to evaluate pragmatic abilities in clinical populations with acquired communicative deficits, ranging from schizophrenia to neurodegenerative diseases. APACS focuses on two main domains, namely discourse and non-literal language, combining traditional tasks with refined linguistic materials in Italian, in a unified framework inspired by language pragmatics. The test includes six tasks (Interview, Description, Narratives, Figurative Language 1, Humor, Figurative Language 2) and three composite scores (Pragmatic Productions, Pragmatic Comprehension, APACS Total). Psychometric properties and normative data were computed on a sample of 119 healthy participants representative of the general population. The analysis revealed acceptable internal consistency and good test-retest reliability for almost every APACS task, suggesting that items are coherent and performance is consistent over time. Factor analysis supports the validity of the test, revealing two factors possibly related to different facets and substrates of the pragmatic competence. Finally, excellent match between APACS items and scores and the pragmatic constructs measured in the test was evidenced by experts' evaluation of content validity. The performance on APACS showed a general effect of demographic variables, with a negative effect of age and a positive effect of education. The norms were calculated by means of state-of-the-art regression methods. Overall, APACS is a valuable tool for the assessment of pragmatic deficits in verbal communication. The short duration and easiness of administration make the test especially suitable to use in clinical settings. In presenting APACS, we also aim at promoting the inclusion of pragmatics in the assessment practice, as a relevant dimension in defining the patient's cognitive profile, given its vital role for communication and social interaction in daily life. The combined use of APACS with other neuropsychological tests could also improve our understanding of the cognitive substrates of pragmatic abilities and their breakdown.

          Related collections

          Most cited references38

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Comparing an Individual's Test Score Against Norms Derived from Small Samples

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Pragmatics, Modularity and Mind-reading

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Weak coherence, no theory of mind, or executive dysfunction? Solving the puzzle of pragmatic language disorders.

              Deficits in pragmatic language ability are common to a number of clinical populations, for example, right-hemisphere damage (RHD), Autism and traumatic brain injury (TBI). In these individuals the basic structural components of language may be intact, but the ability to use language to engage socially is impaired. Despite the nature of these difficulties being well documented, exactly what causes these difficulties is less clear. Furthermore, the current status of causal explanations for pragmatic difficulties across these populations is divergent and sometimes contradictory. This paper explores the empirical validity of three theories that attempt to explain pragmatic language impairment. It is recommended that a new, more convergent approach to investigating the causes of pragmatic language disability be adopted.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Psychol
                Front Psychol
                Front. Psychol.
                Frontiers in Psychology
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1664-1078
                12 February 2016
                2016
                : 7
                : 70
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Department of Neurosciences, University of Padua Padua, Italy
                [2] 2Center for Neurocognition, Epistemology and theoretical Syntax, Institute for Advanced Study (IUSS) Pavia, Italy
                Author notes

                Edited by: Gabriella Airenti, University of Turin, Italy

                Reviewed by: Pilar Prieto, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Spain; Ivan Enrici, University of Turin, Italy

                *Correspondence: Valentina Bambini valentina.bambini@ 123456iusspavia.it

                This article was submitted to Language Sciences, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychology

                Article
                10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00070
                4751735
                26903894
                3fedab04-04b0-4efa-bdbd-c7b82e88497e
                Copyright © 2016 Arcara and Bambini.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 16 October 2015
                : 12 January 2016
                Page count
                Figures: 3, Tables: 7, Equations: 0, References: 66, Pages: 13, Words: 9856
                Categories
                Psychology
                Original Research

                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                pragmatics,neuropragmatics,neuropsychological assessment,figurative language,discourse

                Comments

                Comment on this article