0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Long-term survival after coronary bypass surgery with multiple versus single arterial grafts

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          OBJECTIVES

          This study sought to evaluate the long-term differences in survival between multiple arterial grafts (MAG) and single arterial grafts (SAG) in patients who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in the SYNTAX study.

          METHODS

          The present analysis included the randomized and registry-treated CABG patients ( n = 1509) from the SYNTAX Extended Survival study (SYNTAXES). Patients with only venous ( n = 42) or synthetic grafts ( n = 1) were excluded. The primary end point was all-cause death at the longest follow-up. Multivariable Cox regression was used to adjust for differences in baseline characteristics. Sensitivity analysis using propensity matching with inverse probability for treatment weights was performed.

          RESULTS

          Of the 1466 included patients, 465 (31.7%) received MAG and 1001 (68.3%) SAG. Patients receiving MAG were younger and at lower risk. At the longest follow-up of 12.6 years, all-cause death occurred in 23.6% of MAG and 40.0% of SAG patients [adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 0.74, 95% confidence interval (CI) (0.55–0.98); P = 0.038], which was confirmed by sensitivity analysis. MAG in patients with the three-vessel disease was associated with significant lower unadjusted and adjusted all-cause death at 12.6 years [adjusted HR 0.65, 95% CI (0.44–0.97); P = 0.033]. In contrast, no significance was observed after risk adjustment in patients with the left main disease, with and without diabetes, or among SYNTAX score tertiles.

          CONCLUSIONS

          In the present post hoc analysis of all-comers patients from the SYNTAX trial, MAG resulted in markedly lower all-cause death at 12.6-year follow-up compared to a SAG strategy. Hence, this striking long-term survival benefit of MAG over SAG encourages more extensive use of multiple arterial grafting in selected patients with reasonable life expectancy.

          Trial registration

          SYNTAXES ClinicalTrials.gov reference: NCT03417050; SYNTAX ClinicalTrials.gov reference: NCT00114972.

          Abstract

          Whether coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) should be performed with multiple arterial grafts (MAG) in patients requiring bypass surgery remains fiercely debated.

          Related collections

          Most cited references27

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Sensitivity Analysis in Observational Research: Introducing the E-Value.

          Sensitivity analysis is useful in assessing how robust an association is to potential unmeasured or uncontrolled confounding. This article introduces a new measure called the "E-value," which is related to the evidence for causality in observational studies that are potentially subject to confounding. The E-value is defined as the minimum strength of association, on the risk ratio scale, that an unmeasured confounder would need to have with both the treatment and the outcome to fully explain away a specific treatment-outcome association, conditional on the measured covariates. A large E-value implies that considerable unmeasured confounding would be needed to explain away an effect estimate. A small E-value implies little unmeasured confounding would be needed to explain away an effect estimate. The authors propose that in all observational studies intended to produce evidence for causality, the E-value be reported or some other sensitivity analysis be used. They suggest calculating the E-value for both the observed association estimate (after adjustments for measured confounders) and the limit of the confidence interval closest to the null. If this were to become standard practice, the ability of the scientific community to assess evidence from observational studies would improve considerably, and ultimately, science would be strengthened.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary-artery bypass grafting for severe coronary artery disease.

            Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) involving drug-eluting stents is increasingly used to treat complex coronary artery disease, although coronary-artery bypass grafting (CABG) has been the treatment of choice historically. Our trial compared PCI and CABG for treating patients with previously untreated three-vessel or left main coronary artery disease (or both). We randomly assigned 1800 patients with three-vessel or left main coronary artery disease to undergo CABG or PCI (in a 1:1 ratio). For all these patients, the local cardiac surgeon and interventional cardiologist determined that equivalent anatomical revascularization could be achieved with either treatment. A noninferiority comparison of the two groups was performed for the primary end point--a major adverse cardiac or cerebrovascular event (i.e., death from any cause, stroke, myocardial infarction, or repeat revascularization) during the 12-month period after randomization. Patients for whom only one of the two treatment options would be beneficial, because of anatomical features or clinical conditions, were entered into a parallel, nested CABG or PCI registry. Most of the preoperative characteristics were similar in the two groups. Rates of major adverse cardiac or cerebrovascular events at 12 months were significantly higher in the PCI group (17.8%, vs. 12.4% for CABG; P=0.002), in large part because of an increased rate of repeat revascularization (13.5% vs. 5.9%, P<0.001); as a result, the criterion for noninferiority was not met. At 12 months, the rates of death and myocardial infarction were similar between the two groups; stroke was significantly more likely to occur with CABG (2.2%, vs. 0.6% with PCI; P=0.003). CABG remains the standard of care for patients with three-vessel or left main coronary artery disease, since the use of CABG, as compared with PCI, resulted in lower rates of the combined end point of major adverse cardiac or cerebrovascular events at 1 year. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00114972.) 2009 Massachusetts Medical Society
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Long-term patency of saphenous vein and left internal mammary artery grafts after coronary artery bypass surgery: results from a Department of Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study.

              This study defined long-term patency of saphenous vein grafts (SVG) and internal mammary artery (IMA) grafts. This VA Cooperative Studies Trial defined 10-year SVG patency in 1,074 patients and left IMA patency in 457 patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Patients underwent cardiac catheterizations at 1 week and 1, 3, 6, and 10 years after CABG. Patency at 10 years was 61% for SVGs compared with 85% for IMA grafts (p 2.0 mm in diameter SVG patency was 88% versus 55% in vessels 2.0 mm in diameter.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Eur J Cardiothorac Surg
                Eur J Cardiothorac Surg
                ejcts
                European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery : Official Journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery
                Oxford University Press
                1010-7940
                1873-734X
                April 2022
                07 October 2021
                07 October 2021
                : 61
                : 4
                : 925-933
                Affiliations
                Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Centre , Rotterdam, Netherlands
                University Department of Cardiac Surgery, Heart Centre Leipzig , Leipzig, Germany
                Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, Peter Munk Cardiac Centre, Toronto General Hospital, 15 University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
                Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
                Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Centre , Rotterdam, Netherlands
                Department of Cardiac Surgery and Cardiovascular Research, Dedinje Cardiovascular Institute , Belgrade, Serbia
                Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Louis Stokes Cleveland VA Medical Center , Cleveland, OH, USA
                University Department of Cardiac Surgery, Heart Centre Leipzig , Leipzig, Germany
                Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Centre , Rotterdam, Netherlands
                Department of Cardiology, National University of Ireland , Galway, Ireland
                University Department of Cardiac Surgery, Heart Centre Leipzig , Leipzig, Germany
                Department of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Institute Paris-Sud (ICPS), Hopital privé Jacques Cartier, Ramsay , Générale de Santé Massy, France
                Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Baylor University Medical Center , Dallas, TX, USA
                Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, University Hospital , Uppsala, Sweden
                Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Catharina Hospital , Eindhoven, Netherlands
                Department of Cardiovascular Diseases and Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic , Rochester, MN, USA
                Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Centre , Rotterdam, Netherlands
                Author notes
                [†]

                Daniel J.F.M. Thuijs and Piroze Davierwala contributed equally to this study.

                Corresponding author. Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, POBox 2040, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands. Tel: +31-10-7035411; fax: +31-10-7033993; e-mail: d.thuijs@ 123456erasmusmc.nl (dr. D.J.F.M. Thuijs).
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4855-4996
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0984-9011
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0245-0147
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3545-2229
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3086-4064
                Article
                ezab392
                10.1093/ejcts/ezab392
                8947797
                34618017
                407d3c45-f8d5-4579-9451-61784b19fe4a
                © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com

                History
                : 27 February 2021
                : 21 July 2021
                : 01 August 2021
                Page count
                Pages: 9
                Funding
                Funded by: The SYNTAX Extended Survival;
                Funded by: German Foundation of Heart Research;
                Funded by: Boston Scientific Corporation, DOI 10.13039/100008497;
                Categories
                General Adult Cardiac
                Eacts/112
                Eacts/113
                Eacts/120
                AcademicSubjects/MED00920

                Surgery
                syntax,coronary artery disease,revascularization,coronary artery bypass grafting,multiple arterial grafts,survival

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_

                Similar content226

                Cited by6

                Most referenced authors624