5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Positive heterospecific interactions can increase long‐term diversity of plant communities more than negative conspecific interactions alone

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          • Negative conspecific interactions have been shown to promote diversity in plant communities, as have some heterospecific interactions such as intransitive competition and facilitation. However, it is unclear whether combinations of conspecific and other heterospecific interactions can also promote diversity in plant communities. We therefore investigated the effects of heterospecific plant interaction network architecture with and without conspecific interactions on alpha diversity, beta diversity and long‐term diversity.

          • We simulated long‐term plant community dynamics for theoretical plant interaction scenarios with modular, ring and nested networks of positive or negative heterospecific interactions and conspecific interactions, using a spatially explicit cellular automaton model that accounted for stochastic effects. Throughout the simulations several measures of diversity were recorded.

          • The way that heterospecific interactions affected diversity depended strongly on various characteristics of the architecture of the interaction network. Negative conspecific interactions generally promoted alpha diversity and reduced beta diversity, with a few key exceptions. Positive heterospecific ring interactions that resulted in cyclic appearance and disappearance of species groups led to the greatest long‐term diversity (a measure of the total diversity over time).

          • This study provides new theoretical insights into how the network architecture of heterospecific plant interactions can affect the diversity of plant communities over time and provides the first evidence that heterospecific plant interactions can increase long‐term diversity more than negative conspecific interactions alone.

          A free Plain Language Summary can be found within the Supporting Information of this article.

          Related collections

          Most cited references59

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The architecture of mutualistic networks minimizes competition and increases biodiversity.

          The main theories of biodiversity either neglect species interactions or assume that species interact randomly with each other. However, recent empirical work has revealed that ecological networks are highly structured, and the lack of a theory that takes into account the structure of interactions precludes further assessment of the implications of such network patterns for biodiversity. Here we use a combination of analytical and empirical approaches to quantify the influence of network architecture on the number of coexisting species. As a case study we consider mutualistic networks between plants and their animal pollinators or seed dispersers. These networks have been found to be highly nested, with the more specialist species interacting only with proper subsets of the species that interact with the more generalist. We show that nestedness reduces effective interspecific competition and enhances the number of coexisting species. Furthermore, we show that a nested network will naturally emerge if new species are more likely to enter the community where they have minimal competitive load. Nested networks seem to occur in many biological and social contexts, suggesting that our results are relevant in a wide range of fields.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            The Limiting Similarity, Convergence, and Divergence of Coexisting Species

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Multivariate dispersion as a measure of beta diversity.

              Beta diversity can be defined as the variability in species composition among sampling units for a given area. We propose that it can be measured as the average dissimilarity from individual observation units to their group centroid in multivariate space, using an appropriate dissimilarity measure. Differences in beta diversity among different areas or groups of samples can be tested using this approach. The choice of transformation and dissimilarity measure has important consequences for interpreting results. For kelp holdfast assemblages from New Zealand, variation in species composition was greater in smaller holdfasts, while variation in relative abundances was greater in larger holdasts. Variation in community structure of Norwegian continental shelf macrobenthic fauna increased with increases in environmental heterogeneity, regardless of the measure used. We propose a new dissimilarity measure which allows the relative weight placed on changes in composition vs. abundance to be specified explicitly.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                Journal
                Functional Ecology
                Functional Ecology
                Wiley
                0269-8463
                1365-2435
                January 2022
                November 10 2021
                January 2022
                : 36
                : 1
                : 159-173
                Affiliations
                [1 ] School of Biological Sciences The University of Western Australia Perth WA Australia
                [2 ] School of Agriculture and Environment The University of Western Australia Perth WA Australia
                [3 ] Grupo de Estudios Ambientales IMASL‐CONICET & Universidad Nacional de San Luis San Luis Argentina
                [4 ] Swift Current Research and Development Centre Agriculture and Agri‐Food Canada Swift Current SK Canada
                [5 ] Iluka Resources Limited Perth WA Australia
                [6 ] Harry Butler Institute Murdoch University Perth WA Australia
                [7 ] Department of Geography & Environmental Studies Stellenbosch University Stellenbosch South Africa
                Article
                10.1111/1365-2435.13941
                408f7f64-34e1-4cec-977a-353500e991da
                © 2022

                http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article