5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
2 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Dysautonomia following COVID-19 is not associated with subjective limitations or symptoms, but is associated with objective functional limitations

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Individuals who contract coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) can suffer with persistent and debilitating symptoms long after the initial acute illness. Heart rate (HR) profiles determined during cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) and delivered as part of a post-COVID recovery service may provide an insight into presence and impact of dysautonomia on functional ability.

          Objective

          Using an active, working age, post-COVID-19 population, the aim was to: 1) understand and characterise any association between subjective symptoms and dysautonomia, and 2) identify objective exercise capacity differences between patients classified ‘with’ and ‘without’ dysautonomia.

          Methods

          Patients referred to a post-COVID-19 service underwent comprehensive clinical assessment, including self-reported symptoms, CPET and secondary care investigations when indicated. Resting HR >75 beats per minute (bpm), HR increase with exercise <89bpm, and HR recovery <25bpm one minute after exercise were used to define dysautonomia. Anonymised data were analysed and associations with symptoms and CPET outcomes determined.

          Results

          Fifty-one (25%) of the 205 patients reviewed as part of this service evaluation had dysautonomia. There were no associations between symptoms or perceived functional limitation and dysautonomia (p>0.05). Patients with dysautonomia demonstrated objective functional limitations with significantly reduced work rate (219±37 W vs. 253±52 W, p<0.001), peak oxygen consumption (V̇O 2: 30.6±5.5 ml/kg/min vs. 35.8±7.6 ml/kg/min, p<0.001) and a steeper (less efficient) V̇E/V̇CO 2 slope (29.9±4.9 vs. 27.7±4.7, p=0.005).

          Conclusion

          Dysautonomia is associated with objective functional limitations but is not associated with subjective symptoms or limitation.

          Related collections

          Most cited references21

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found

          Persistent Symptoms in Patients After Acute COVID-19

          This case series describes COVID-19 symptoms persisting a mean of 60 days after onset among Italian patients previously discharged from COVID-19 hospitalization.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Psychophysical bases of perceived exertion.

            G Borg (1982)
            There is a great demand for perceptual effort ratings in order to better understand man at work. Such ratings are important complements to behavioral and physiological measurements of physical performance and work capacity. This is true for both theoretical analysis and application in medicine, human factors, and sports. Perceptual estimates, obtained by psychophysical ratio-scaling methods, are valid when describing general perceptual variation, but category methods are more useful in several applied situations when differences between individuals are described. A presentation is made of ratio-scaling methods, category methods, especially the Borg Scale for ratings of perceived exertion, and a new method that combines the category method with ratio properties. Some of the advantages and disadvantages of the different methods are discussed in both theoretical-psychophysical and psychophysiological frames of reference.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Persistent symptoms 3 months after a SARS-CoV-2 infection: the post-COVID-19 syndrome?

              Background Many patients with COVID-19 do not require hospitalisation, let alone have undergone COVID-19 testing. There is anecdotal evidence that patients with “mild” COVID-19 may complain about persistent symptoms, even weeks after the infection. This suggests that symptoms during the infection may not resolve spontaneously. The objective of this study was to assess whether multiple relevant symptoms recover following the onset of symptoms in hospitalised and non-hospitalised patients with COVID-19. Methods 2113 members of two Facebook groups for coronavirus patients with persistent complaints in The Netherlands and Belgium, and from a panel of people who registered at a website of the Lung Foundation Netherlands, were assessed for demographics, pre-existing comorbidities, health status, date of symptoms onset, COVID-19 diagnosis, healthcare utilisation, and the presence of 29 symptoms at the time of the onset of symptoms (retrospectively) and at follow-up (79±17 days after symptoms onset). Results 112 hospitalised patients and 2001 non-hospitalised patients (confirmed COVID-19, n=345; symptom-based COVID-19, n=882; and suspected COVID-19, n=774) were analysed. The median number of symptoms during the infection reduced significantly over time (14 (11–17) versus6 (4–9), p<0.001). Fatigue and dyspnoea were the most prevalent symptoms during the infection and at follow-up (fatigue: 95% versus 87%; dyspnoea: 90% versus 71%). Conclusion In previously hospitalised and non-hospitalised patients with confirmed or suspected COVID-19, multiple symptoms are present about 3 months after symptoms onset. This suggests the presence of a “post-COVID-19 syndrome” and highlights the unmet healthcare needs in a subgroup of patients with “mild” or “severe” COVID-19.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Heart Rhythm
                Heart Rhythm
                Heart Rhythm
                Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of Heart Rhythm Society.
                1547-5271
                1556-3871
                9 December 2021
                9 December 2021
                Affiliations
                [a ]Academic Department of Military Rehabilitation (ADMR), Defence Medical Rehabilitation Centre (DMRC), Stanford Hall, Loughborough, UK
                [b ]Department for Health, University of Bath, Bath, UK
                [c ]Headquarters Army Medical Directorate (HQ AMD), Robertson House, Camberley, UK
                [d ]School of Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences, Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK
                [e ]Academic Department of Military Medicine, Birmingham, UK
                [f ]Oxford Centre for Cardiovascular MRI, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
                [g ]National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK
                [h ]Royal Centre for Defence Medicine, Birmingham, UK,
                [i ]Royal Brompton Hospital, London, UK
                [j ]Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
                [k ]Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
                [l ]Department of Physiology, Anatomy and Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
                Author notes
                []Corresponding Author: Dr David A Holdsworth Oxford Heart Centre, John Radcliffe Hospital, OXFORD, OX3 9DU
                Article
                S1547-5271(21)02430-9
                10.1016/j.hrthm.2021.12.005
                8656177
                34896622
                40c2e8c4-633b-419c-aefa-7b6efc6b46d4
                © 2021 Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of Heart Rhythm Society.

                Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.

                History
                : 27 October 2021
                : 25 November 2021
                : 5 December 2021
                Categories
                Article

                Cardiovascular Medicine
                covid-19,cpet,dysautonomia,exercise testing,symptoms
                Cardiovascular Medicine
                covid-19, cpet, dysautonomia, exercise testing, symptoms

                Comments

                Comment on this article