16
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Screening for Prediabetes and Type 2 Diabetes : US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references45

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Reduction in the incidence of type 2 diabetes with lifestyle intervention or metformin.

          Type 2 diabetes affects approximately 8 percent of adults in the United States. Some risk factors--elevated plasma glucose concentrations in the fasting state and after an oral glucose load, overweight, and a sedentary lifestyle--are potentially reversible. We hypothesized that modifying these factors with a lifestyle-intervention program or the administration of metformin would prevent or delay the development of diabetes. We randomly assigned 3234 nondiabetic persons with elevated fasting and post-load plasma glucose concentrations to placebo, metformin (850 mg twice daily), or a lifestyle-modification program with the goals of at least a 7 percent weight loss and at least 150 minutes of physical activity per week. The mean age of the participants was 51 years, and the mean body-mass index (the weight in kilograms divided by the square of the height in meters) was 34.0; 68 percent were women, and 45 percent were members of minority groups. The average follow-up was 2.8 years. The incidence of diabetes was 11.0, 7.8, and 4.8 cases per 100 person-years in the placebo, metformin, and lifestyle groups, respectively. The lifestyle intervention reduced the incidence by 58 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 48 to 66 percent) and metformin by 31 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 17 to 43 percent), as compared with placebo; the lifestyle intervention was significantly more effective than metformin. To prevent one case of diabetes during a period of three years, 6.9 persons would have to participate in the lifestyle-intervention program, and 13.9 would have to receive metformin. Lifestyle changes and treatment with metformin both reduced the incidence of diabetes in persons at high risk. The lifestyle intervention was more effective than metformin.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Global aetiology and epidemiology of type 2 diabetes mellitus and its complications

            Globally, the number of people with diabetes mellitus has quadrupled in the past three decades, and diabetes mellitus is the ninth major cause of death. About 1 in 11 adults worldwide now have diabetes mellitus, 90% of whom have type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Asia is a major area of the rapidly emerging T2DM global epidemic, with China and India the top two epicentres. Although genetic predisposition partly determines individual susceptibility to T2DM, an unhealthy diet and a sedentary lifestyle are important drivers of the current global epidemic; early developmental factors (such as intrauterine exposures) also have a role in susceptibility to T2DM later in life. Many cases of T2DM could be prevented with lifestyle changes, including maintaining a healthy body weight, consuming a healthy diet, staying physically active, not smoking and drinking alcohol in moderation. Most patients with T2DM have at least one complication, and cardiovascular complications are the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in these patients. This Review provides an updated view of the global epidemiology of T2DM, as well as dietary, lifestyle and other risk factors for T2DM and its complications.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              2. Classification and Diagnosis of Diabetes: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes—2020

              (2019)
              The American Diabetes Association (ADA) "Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes" includes the ADA's current clinical practice recommendations and is intended to provide the components of diabetes care, general treatment goals and guidelines, and tools to evaluate quality of care. Members of the ADA Professional Practice Committee (https://doi.org/10.2337/dc20-SPPC), a multidisciplinary expert committee, are responsible for updating the Standards of Care annually, or more frequently as warranted. For a detailed description of ADA standards, statements, and reports, as well as the evidence-grading system for ADA's clinical practice recommendations, please refer to the Standards of Care Introduction (https://doi.org/10.2337/dc20-SINT). Readers who wish to comment on the Standards of Care are invited to do so at professional.diabetes.org/SOC.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                JAMA
                JAMA
                American Medical Association (AMA)
                0098-7484
                August 24 2021
                August 24 2021
                : 326
                : 8
                : 736
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research at Northwell Health, Manhasset, New York
                [2 ]Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
                [3 ]University of California, Los Angeles
                [4 ]Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, New York
                [5 ]Oregon Health & Science University, Portland
                [6 ]University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
                [7 ]University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
                [8 ]Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
                [9 ]Fairfax Family Practice Residency, Fairfax, Virginia
                [10 ]Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond
                [11 ]George Mason University, Fairfax, Virginia
                [12 ]University of Virginia, Charlottesville
                [13 ]New York University, New York, New York
                [14 ]Stanford University, Stanford, California
                [15 ]University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester
                [16 ]Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts
                [17 ]University of Missouri, Columbia
                [18 ]University of Hawaii, Honolulu
                [19 ]Pacific Health Research and Education Institute, Honolulu, Hawaii
                [20 ]Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts
                Article
                10.1001/jama.2021.12531
                34427594
                40ca4c90-4a84-497f-a9c2-79c76bf68c1f
                © 2021
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article