Inviting an author to review:
Find an author and click ‘Invite to review selected article’ near their name.
Search for authorsSearch for similar articles
9
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Candidate Biomarkers of Extravascular Extracellular Space: A Direct Comparison of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient and Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MR Imaging—Derived Measurement of the Volume of the Extravascular Extracellular Space in Glioblastoma Multiforme

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE:

          ADC measurements have been shown to have an inverse relationship with tumor cell density. DCE-MR imaging modeling techniques can produce a measurement of the v e, which would also be expected to have an inverse relationship with cell density. The objective of this study was to test the hypothesis that areas of increased cellularity, and therefore low ADC, would be expected to have a small EES (low v e).

          MATERIALS AND METHODS:

          Nineteen patients with GBM were recruited. All imaging was performed before surgery on a 3T MR imaging scanner. Imaging included diffusion tensor imaging, T1-weighted DCE-MR imaging, and anatomic sequences. Tumor VOIs were defined on the anatomic images and modified to contain only enhancing voxels. Parametric maps of ADC and v e were generated. Statistical analysis of ADC and v e was performed on both a voxel-by-voxel basis and comparison of median values.

          RESULTS:

          No correlation was demonstrated between ADC and v e in either a voxel-by-voxel analysis or comparison of median values ( P = .124).

          CONCLUSIONS:

          This study failed to demonstrate a correlation between ADC and v e. This is important because it suggests that though the mechanisms underlying these parameters are theoretically similar, they actually reflect different aspects of tumor microenvironment. Consequently ADC and v e should be considered to provide independent information about the properties of the EES.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          AJNR Am J Neuroradiol
          AJNR Am J Neuroradiol
          ajnr
          ajnr
          AJNR
          AJNR: American Journal of Neuroradiology
          American Society of Neuroradiology
          0195-6108
          1936-959X
          March 2010
          : 31
          : 3
          : 549-553
          Affiliations
          [1] aFrom the Imaging Science and Biomedical Engineering Department (S.J.M., C.J.R., S.C., S.Z., G.J.M.P., A.J.), School of Cancer and Imaging Sciences, University of Manchester, Withington, Manchester, United Kingdom
          [2] bDepartment of Neuroradiology (S.J.M., C.S., A.J.), Hope Hospital, Salford, United Kingdom
          [3] cBiomedical Imaging Institute (S.J.M., C.J.R., S.C., S.Z., G.J.M.P., A.J.), University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
          Author notes
          Please address correspondence to Samantha Mills, M.D., Wolfson Molecular Imaging Centre, Imaging Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, University of Manchester, 27 Palatine Rd, Withington, Manchester, M20 3LJ, United Kingdom; e-mail: samantha.mills@ 123456manchester.ac.uk
          Article
          PMC7963970 PMC7963970 7963970 09-00656
          10.3174/ajnr.A1844
          7963970
          19850765
          413a7fee-e939-43fb-b566-127c6d7977ca
          Copyright © American Society of Neuroradiology

          Indicates open access to non-subscribers at www.ajnr.org

          History
          : 18 June 2009
          : 9 July 2009
          Categories
          Brain

          Comments

          Comment on this article