Inviting an author to review:
Find an author and click ‘Invite to review selected article’ near their name.
Search for authorsSearch for similar articles
3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Traumatic hollow viscus and mesenteric injury: role of CT and potential diagnostic–therapeutic algorithm

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Despite its rarity, traumatic hollow viscus and mesenteric injury (HVMI) have high mortality and complication rates. There is no consensus regarding its best management. Our aim is to evaluate contrast enhanced CT (ceCT) in the screening of HVMI and its capability to assess the need for surgery. All trauma patients admitted to an urban Level 1 trauma center between 2010 and 2018 were retrospectively evaluated. Patients with ceCT scan prior to laparotomy were included. Patients requiring surgical repair of HVMI and a ceCT scan consistent with HVMI were considered true positives. Six ceCT scan criteria for HVMI were used; at least one criterion was considered positive for HVMI. Sensitivity (Sn), specificity (Sp), predictive values (PV), likelihood ratios (LR) and accuracy (Ac) of ceCT of single ceCT criteria and of the association of ceCT criteria were calculated using intraoperative findings as gold standard. Therapeutic time (TT), death probability (DP), and observed mortality (OM) were described. 114 of 4369 patients were selected for ceCT accuracy analysis; 47 were considered true positives. Sn of ceCT for HVMI was 97.9%, Sp 63.6%, PPV 66.2%, NPV 97.6%, + LR 2.69, −LR 0.03, Ac 78%; no single criterion stood out. The association of four or more criteria improved ceCT Sp to 98.5%, PPV to 95.6%, + LR to 30.5. Median TT was 2 h (IQR: 1–3 h). OM was 7.8%—not significantly higher than overall OM. CeCT in trauma has become a reliable screening test for HVMI and a valid exam to select HVMI patients for surgical exploration.

          Related collections

          Most cited references36

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Relatively short diagnostic delays (<8 hours) produce morbidity and mortality in blunt small bowel injury: an analysis of time to operative intervention in 198 patients from a multicenter experience.

          Blunt small bowel injury (SBI) is uncommon, and its timely diagnosis may be difficult. The impact of operative delays on morbidity and mortality has been unclear. The purpose of this study was to determine the relationship of diagnostic delays to morbidity and mortality in blunt SBI. Patients with blunt SBI with perforation were identified from the registries of eight trauma centers (1989-1997). Patients with duodenal injuries were excluded. Data were extracted by individual chart review. Patients were classified as multi-trauma (group 1) or near-isolated SBI (group 2 with Abbreviated Injury Scale score < 2 for other body areas). Time to operation and its impact on mortality and morbidity was determined for each patient. A total of 198 patients met inclusion criteria: 66.2% were male, mean age was 35.2 years (range, 1-90 years) and mean Injury Severity Score was 16.7 (range, 9-47). 100 patients had multiple injuries (group 1). There were 21 deaths (10.6%) with 9 (4.5%) attributable to delay in operation for SBI. In patients with near-isolated SBI, the incidence of mortality increased with time to operative intervention (within 8 hours: 2%; 8-16 hours: 9.1%; 16-24 hours: 16.7%; greater than 24 hours: 30.8%, p = 0.009) as did the incidence of complications. Delays as short as 8 hours 5 minutes and 11 hours 15 minutes were associated with mortality attributable to SBI. The rates of delay in diagnosis were not significantly associated with age, gender, intoxication, transfer status, or presence of associated injuries. Delays in the diagnosis of SBI are directly responsible for almost half the deaths in this series. Even relatively brief delays (as little as 8 hours) result in morbidity and mortality directly attributable to "missed" SBI. Further investigation into the prompt diagnosis of this injury is needed.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Incidence of hollow viscus injury in blunt trauma: an analysis from 275,557 trauma admissions from the East multi-institutional trial.

            Blunt hollow viscus injury (HVI) is uncommon. No sufficiently large series has studied the prevalence of these injuries in blunt trauma patients. This study defines the prevalence of blunt HVI, in addition to the associated morbidity and mortality rates for this diagnosis on the basis of a series of over 275,000 trauma admissions. Patients with blunt small bowel injury (SBI) were identified from the registries of 95 trauma centers for a 2-year period (1998-1999). Each HVI patient (case) was matched by age and Injury Severity Score with a blunt trauma patient receiving an abdominal workup who did not have HVI (control). Patient level data were abstracted by individual chart review. Institution level data were collected on total numbers for trauma admission demographics and on total diagnostic examinations performed. From 275,557 trauma admissions, 227,972 blunt injury patients were identified. HVI was rare, with 2,632 patients identified from this group. Perforating small bowel injury accounted for less than 0.3% of blunt admissions. Mortality and morbidity were high for HVI. Controlling for injury severity, patients with HVI were usually at higher risk of death than non-HVI patients. HVI is a rare but deadly phenomenon. The high mortality rates reflect the severity of the HVI and associated injuries. HVI patients should be carefully monitored for related injuries and complications.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Current diagnostic approaches lack sensitivity in the diagnosis of perforated blunt small bowel injury: analysis from 275,557 trauma admissions from the EAST multi-institutional HVI trial.

              Blunt SBI is infrequent and its diagnosis may be difficult, especially in the face of confounding variables. The purpose of this study was to evaluate methods for making the diagnosis of blunt SBI. Patients with blunt small bowel injury (SBI) were identified from the registries of 95 trauma centers for a 2-year period (1998-1999). Patients with SBI (cases) were matched by age and Injury Severity Score with a blunt trauma patient receiving an abdominal workup who did not have SBI (controls). Logistic regression models were unable to differentiate SBI with perforation from SBI without perforation. Thirteen percent of patients with documented perforating SBI had normal abdominal computed tomographic scans preoperatively. Alone or in combination, current diagnostic approaches lack sensitivity in the diagnosis of perforated SBI. Improvements in diagnostic methods and approaches are needed to ensure the prompt diagnosis of this uncommon but potentially devastating injury.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                alessandro.bonomi21@gmail.com
                stefano.granieri@asst-vimercate.it
                shailvi.gupta@gmail.com
                maltomare33@gmail.com
                spbcioffi@gmail.com
                fabrizio.sammartano@ospedaleniguarda.it
                stefania.cimbanassi@ospedaleniguarda.it
                osvaldo.chiara@ospedaleniguarda.it
                Journal
                Updates Surg
                Updates Surg
                Updates in Surgery
                Springer International Publishing (Cham )
                2038-131X
                2038-3312
                19 December 2020
                19 December 2020
                2021
                : 73
                : 2
                : 703-710
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.4708.b, ISNI 0000 0004 1757 2822, General Surgery Resident at Università Degli Studi di Milano, ; Milan, Italy
                [2 ]General Surgery Unit, ASST Vimercate, Via Santi Cosma e Damiano 10, Vimercate, MB Italy
                [3 ]Department of Surgery, University of Maryland, R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center, Baltimore, MD USA
                [4 ]Chirurgia Generale e Trauma Team ASST Niguarda, Piazza Ospedale Maggiore 3, 20162 Milan, Italy
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2409-2109
                Article
                929
                10.1007/s13304-020-00929-w
                8005390
                33340338
                42d4b6e4-a073-4763-8039-34a474ca5645
                © The Author(s) 2020

                Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                History
                : 17 May 2020
                : 11 November 2020
                Funding
                Funded by: Università degli Studi di Milano
                Categories
                Original Article
                Custom metadata
                © Italian Society of Surgery (SIC) 2021

                Surgery
                blunt trauma,penetrating trauma,ct scan,hollow viscus
                Surgery
                blunt trauma, penetrating trauma, ct scan, hollow viscus

                Comments

                Comment on this article