5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Prehospital assessment of patients with abdominal pain triaged to self-care at home: an observation study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Patients who call for emergency medical services (EMS) due to abdominal pain suffer from a broad spectrum of diseases, some of which are time sensitive. As a result of the introduction of the concept of ‘optimal level of care‘, some patients with abdominal pain are triaged to other levels of care than in an emergency department (ED). We hypothesised that it could be challenging in a patient safety perspective.

          Aim

          This study aims to describe consecutive patients who call for EMS due to abdominal pain and are triaged to self-care by EMS clinicians.

          Methods

          This was an observational study performed in an EMS organisation in Western Sweden during 2020. The triage tool Rapid Emergency Triage and Treatment System (RETTS), which included Emergency Signs and Symptom (ESS) codes, was used to find medical records where patients with abdominal pain have been triaged to self-care and 194 patients was included in the study.

          Results

          Of total 48,311 ambulance missions, A total of 1747 patients were labelled with ESS code six (abdominal pain), including 223 (12.8%) who were given the code for self-care and 194 who were further assessed by the research group. Of these patients, 32 (16.3%) had a return visit within 96 hours due to the same symptoms and 11 (5.6%) were hospitalised. In six of these patients, the EMS triage was evaluated retrospectively and assessed as inappropriate. These patients had a final diagnosis of ruptured abdominal aneurysm ( n = 1), acute appendicitis with peritonitis ( n = 2) and acute pancreatitis ( n = 3). All these patients required extensive evaluation and different treatments, including acute surgery, antibiotics and fluid therapy.

          Conclusion

          Amongst the 1747 patients assessed by EMS due to abdominal pain, 223 (12.8%) were triaged to self-care. Of the 194 patients who were further assessed, 16.3% required a return visit to the ED within 96 hours and 5.6% were hospitalised. Six patients had obvious time-sensitive conditions. Our study highlights the difficulties in the early assessment of abdominal pain and the requirement for an accurate decision support tool.

          Related collections

          Most cited references25

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Looking through the retrospectoscope: reducing bias in emergency medicine chart review studies.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Medical Emergency Triage and Treatment System (METTS): a new protocol in primary triage and secondary priority decision in emergency medicine.

            In many Emergency Department (ED) triage scoring systems, vital signs are not included as an assessment parameter. To evaluate the validity of a new protocol for Emergency Medicine in a large cohort of patients referred to in-hospital care. From January 1 to June 30, 2006, 22,934 patients were admitted to the ED at Sahlgrenska University Hospital. Of those, 8695 were referred to in-hospital care and included in the study. A new five-level triage tool, combining vital signs, symptoms, and signs in the triage decision, was used. A small control of the inter-rater disagreement was also performed in 132 parallel, single-blinded observations. Fifty percent of the patients were admitted by ambulance and the other 50% by walk-in. Hospital stay was significantly (p < 0.001) longer in those admitted by ambulance (9.3 ± 14 days) as compared with walk-in patients (6.2 ± 10 days). In-hospital mortality incidence was higher (8.1%) in patients admitted by ambulance, as compared with walk-in patients (2.4%). Hospital stay and in-hospital mortality increased with higher level of priority. In the highest priority groups, 32-53% of the patients were downgraded to a lower priority level after primary treatment. In the present study, the METTS protocol was shown to be a reliable triage method and a sensitive tool for secondary re-evaluation of the patient in the ED. Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Drivers of Increasing Emergency Ambulance Demand

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                glenn.larsson@hb.se
                peter.hansson@vgregion.se
                emelie.m.olsson@vgregion.se
                Johan.herlitz@hb.se
                Magnus.hagiwara@hb.se
                Journal
                BMC Emerg Med
                BMC Emerg Med
                BMC Emergency Medicine
                BioMed Central (London )
                1471-227X
                3 June 2022
                3 June 2022
                2022
                : 22
                : 92
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.412442.5, ISNI 0000 0000 9477 7523, Centre for Prehospital Research, Faculty of Caring Science, Work Life and Social Welfare, , University of Borås, ; SE-501 90 Borås, Sweden
                [2 ]GRID grid.1649.a, ISNI 000000009445082X, Department of Prehospital Emergency Care, , Sahlgrenska University Hospital, ; Gothenburg, Sweden
                [3 ]GRID grid.459843.7, ISNI 0000 0004 0624 0259, NU Hospital Group (NU), Department of Ambulance Care, ; SE- 461 85, Trollhättan, Sweden
                Article
                649
                10.1186/s12873-022-00649-x
                9164890
                35659247
                42fdd272-d575-47ca-b0aa-7cdc1c1cb71e
                © The Author(s) 2022

                Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

                History
                : 28 January 2022
                : 17 May 2022
                Funding
                Funded by: University of Boras
                Categories
                Research
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2022

                Emergency medicine & Trauma
                prehospital,ems,assessment,triage,self-care
                Emergency medicine & Trauma
                prehospital, ems, assessment, triage, self-care

                Comments

                Comment on this article