37
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Female mice liberated for inclusion in neuroscience and biomedical research

      , ,
      Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
      Elsevier BV

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The underrepresentation of female mice in neuroscience and biomedical research is based on the assumption that females are intrinsically more variable than males and must be tested at each of four stages of the estrous cycle to generate reliable data. Neither belief is empirically based. In a meta-analysis of 293 articles, behavioral, morphological, physiological, and molecular traits were monitored in male mice and females tested without regard to estrous cycle stage; variability was not significantly greater in females than males for any endpoint and was substantially greater in males for several traits. Group housing of mice increased variability in both males and females by 37%. Utilization of female mice in neuroscience research does not require monitoring of the estrous cycle. The prevalence of sex differences at all levels of biological organization, and limitations in generalizing findings obtained with males to females, argue for the routine inclusion of female rodents in most research protocols. Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
          Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
          Elsevier BV
          01497634
          March 2014
          March 2014
          : 40
          : 1-5
          Article
          10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.01.001
          24456941
          436b2ad5-b456-4d40-9cdf-b78a51732229
          © 2014
          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article