301
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Brat Promotes Stem Cell Differentiation via Control of a Bistable Switch that Restricts BMP Signaling

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Summary

          Drosophila ovarian germline stem cells (GSCs) are maintained by Dpp signaling and the Pumilio (Pum) and Nanos (Nos) translational repressors. Upon division, Dpp signaling is extinguished, and Nos is downregulated in one daughter cell, causing it to switch to a differentiating cystoblast (CB). However, downstream effectors of Pum-Nos remain unknown, and how CBs lose their responsiveness to Dpp is unclear. Here, we identify Brain Tumor (Brat) as a potent differentiation factor and target of Pum-Nos regulation. Brat is excluded from GSCs by Pum-Nos but functions with Pum in CBs to translationally repress distinct targets, including the Mad and dMyc mRNAs. Regulation of both targets simultaneously lowers cellular responsiveness to Dpp signaling, forcing the cell to become refractory to the self-renewal signal. Mathematical modeling elucidates bistability of cell fate in the Brat-mediated system, revealing how autoregulation of GSC number can arise from Brat coupling extracellular Dpp regulation to intracellular interpretation.

          Highlights

          ► Pumilio and Nanos translationally repress brat mRNA in germline stem cells ► Brat promotes differentiation by limiting Dpp signaling and cellular growth ► Brat acts with Pumilio to repress translation of the Mad and dMyc mRNAs ► Modeling shows Brat creates bistability and provides robust cell-fate control

          Related collections

          Most cited references51

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          A niche maintaining germ line stem cells in the Drosophila ovary.

          Stromal cells are thought to generate specific regulatory microenviroments or "niches" that control stem cell behavior. Characterizing stem cell niches in vivo remains an important goal that has been difficult to achieve. The individual ovarioles of the Drosophila ovary each contain about two germ line stem cells that maintain oocyte production. Here we show that anterior ovariolar somatic cells comprising three cell types act as a germ line stem cell niche. Germ line stem cells lost by normal or induced differentiation are efficiently replaced, and the ability to repopulate the niche increases the functional lifetime of ovarioles in vivo. Our studies implicate one of the somatic cell types, the cap cells, as a key niche component.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            A discrete transcriptional silencer in the bam gene determines asymmetric division of the Drosophila germline stem cell.

            The Drosophila germline lineage depends on a complex microenvironment of extrinsic and intrinsic factors that regulate the self-renewing and asymmetric divisions of dedicated stem cells. Germline stem cells (GSCs) must express components of the Dpp cassette and the translational repressors Nanos and Pumilio, whereas cystoblasts require the bam and bgcn genes. Bam is especially attractive as a target of GSC differentiation factors because current evidence indicates that bam is both necessary and sufficient for cystoblast differentiation. In this paper, we have sought to distinguish between mutually exclusive transcriptional or post-transcriptional mechanisms as the primary regulators of bam expression in GSCs and cystoblasts. We find that bam transcription is active in young germ cells but is repressed specifically in GSCs. Activation depends on a 50 bp fragment that carries at least one germ cell-specific enhancer element. A non-overlapping 18 bp sequence carries a transcriptional silencer that prevents bam expression in the GSC. Promoters lacking this silencer cause bam expression in the GSC and concomitant GSC loss. Thus, asymmetry of the GSC division can be reduced to identifying the mechanism that selectively activates the silencer element in GSCs.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              decapentaplegic is essential for the maintenance and division of germline stem cells in the Drosophila ovary.

              Stem cells are thought to occupy special local environments, or niches, established by neighboring cells that give them the capability for self-renewal. Each ovariole in the Drosophila ovary contains two germline stem cells surrounded by a group of differentiated somatic cells that express hedgehog and wingless. Here we show that the BMP2/4 homolog decapentaplegic (dpp) is specifically required to maintain female germline stem cells and promote their division. Overexpression of dpp blocks germline stem cell differentiation. Conversely, mutations in dpp or its receptor (saxophone) accelerate stem cell loss and retard stem cell division. We constructed mutant germline stem cell clones to show that the dpp signal is directly received by germline stem cells. Thus, dpp signaling helps define a niche that controls germline stem cell proliferation.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Dev Cell
                Dev. Cell
                Developmental Cell
                Cell Press
                1534-5807
                1878-1551
                18 January 2011
                18 January 2011
                : 20
                : 1
                : 72-83
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PT, UK
                [2 ]Department of Agricultural and Biological Engineering and Weldon School of Biomedical Engineering, Bindley Bioscience Center, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA
                Author notes
                []Corresponding author hilary.ashe@ 123456manchester.ac.uk
                Article
                DEVCEL2057
                10.1016/j.devcel.2010.11.019
                3178012
                21238926
                436deec2-91e3-41ae-ae65-84835ff9f972
                © 2011 ELL & Excerpta Medica.

                This document may be redistributed and reused, subject to certain conditions.

                History
                : 7 May 2010
                : 25 October 2010
                : 15 November 2010
                Categories
                Article

                Developmental biology
                Developmental biology

                Comments

                Comment on this article