14
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Characteristics of maize cultivars in Africa: How modern are they and how many do smallholder farmers grow?

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Maize is the most important cereal and most widely cultivated staple that plays a key role in the food security of sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). Although some countries have achieved significant gains in maize productivity, the SSA average yields are far below what could be obtained with improved cultivars under good crop management. Low cultivar turnover is one among many contributing factors to low maize yields in SSA. At present, there is a critical knowledge gap on the identity, number, and age of maize cultivars currently grown by smallholder farmers on the continent.

          Results

          This study revealed that nearly 500 maize cultivars were grown in 13 African countries surveyed in the 2013/2014 main crop season. Sixty-nine percent of the cultivars each occupied <1% of the total maize area; only two cultivars occupied >40% and four occupied >30% area. Approximately 32% of all the cultivars were hybrids, 23% were improved open-pollinated varieties (OPVs), and 46% were locals. Eastern Africa (EA) and southern Africa (SA) accounted for about 43 and 38%, respectively, of all the cultivars reported, whereas West Africa’s (WA) share was 19%. The average area planted to modern cultivars in the surveyed areas was estimated at 57%—with EA, SA, and WA estimates of 82, 55, and 36%, respectively; however, increased adoption was not necessarily always related to improved productivity, as the latter depends on many additional factors. Each household planted an average of 1.781 cultivars (range 1–8). The overall weighted average age of the cultivars was 15 years, with hybrids and OPVs being 13 and 18 years, respectively.

          Conclusions

          Maize variety turnover in SSA is slower than what is practiced in the USA and other world regions such as Latin America and Asia. The substantial variations among regions and countries in all parameters measured suggest a tailored approach to mitigation interventions. Findings of this current study pave the way for replacing the old cultivars with more recent releases that are tolerant or resistant to multiple stresses and are more resilient.

          Related collections

          Most cited references26

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Modern maize varieties going local in the semi-arid zone in Tanzania

          Background Maize is the most produced crop in Sub-Saharan Africa, but yields are low and climate change is projected to further constrain smallholder production. The current efforts to breed and disseminate new high yielding and climate ready maize varieties are implemented through the formal seed system; the chain of public and private sector activities and institutions that produce and release certified seeds. These efforts are taking place in contexts currently dominated by informal seed systems; local and informal seed management and exchange channels with a long history of adapting crops to local conditions. We here present a case study of the genetic effects of both formal and informal seed management from the semi-arid zone in Tanzania. Results Two open pollinated varieties (OPVs), Staha and TMV1, first released by the formal seed system in the 1980s are cultivated on two-thirds of the maize fields among the surveyed households. Farmer-recycling of improved varieties and seed selection are common on-farm seed management practices. Drought tolerance and high yield are the most important characteristics reported as reason for cultivating the current varieties as well as the most important criteria for farmers’ seed selection. Bayesian cluster analysis, PCA and FST analyses based on 131 SNPs clearly distinguish between the two OPVs, and despite considerable heterogeneity between and within seed lots, there is insignificant differentiation between breeder’s seeds and commercial seeds in both OPVs. Genetic separation increases as the formal system varieties enter the informal system and both hybridization with unrelated varieties and directional selection probably play a role in the differentiation. Using a Bayesian association approach we identify three loci putatively under selection in the informal seed system. Conclusions Our results suggest that the formal seed system in the study area distributes seed lots that are true to type. We suggest that hybridization and directional selection differentiate farmer recycled seed lots from the original varieties and potentially lead to beneficial creolization. Access to drought tolerant OPVs in combination with farmer seed selection is likely to enhance seed system security and farmers’ adaptive capacity in the face of climate change.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Analysis of Adoption and Impacts of Improved Maize Varieties in Eastern Zambia

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Factors that transformed maize productivity in Ethiopia

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Agric Food Secur
                Agric Food Secur
                AFS
                Agriculture & Food Security
                Springer Nature
                2048-7010
                17 March 2017
                2017
                : 6
                : 30
                Affiliations
                [1 ]CIMMYT-Kenya, PO Box 1041-00621, Nairobi, Kenya
                [2 ]CIMMYT-Ethiopia, c/o ILRI Sholla Campus, CMC Road, PO Box 5689, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
                [3 ]Present Address: College of Agricultural Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, USA
                [4 ]IITA-Nigeria Ibadan, PMB 5320, Oyo Road, Ibadan, Nigeria
                [5 ]ICARDA Sub-Saharan Africa Program, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
                [6 ]CIMMYT-Zimbabwe, PO Box MP163, 12.5 km Peg Mazowe Road, Harare, Zimbabwe
                Author notes
                [* ]Correspondence: t.d.abate@ 123456cgiar.org
                [1]

                CIMMYT-Kenya, PO Box 1041-00621, Nairobi, Kenya

                Full list of author information is available at the end of the article

                Article
                AFS-2017-s40066-017-0108-6
                10.1186/s40066-017-0108-6
                7507799
                32983427
                43ac2ec2-c2c4-4d61-903e-3bec767a0400
                © 2017 Sellgren KL et al

                This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 07 January 2017
                : 10 March 2017
                Categories
                Research

                variety turnover,age of varieties,maize adoption,smallholder agriculture

                Comments

                Comment on this article