0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      BACKGROUND RADIATION LEVELS NEAR A MINERAL SAND MINING FACTORY IN SRI LANKA: CORRELATION OF RADIATION MEASUREMENTS WITH MICRONUCLEI FREQUENCY

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Lanka Mineral Sands Ltd (LMS) is a company operating in Pulmoddai, Sri Lanka, mining for rare earth minerals along with monazite which contains thorium that emits ionizing gamma and alpha radiation on decay. The objective of the study was to determine the background radiation levels and selected radionuclides and then to correlate these levels with the frequency of micronuclei (MN) among persons residing in the vicinity of LMS. A cross-sectional study was conducted among persons of both sexes between 35 and 45 years of age residing in the vicinity of LMS. Background radiation measurements were obtained by a survey metre, and gamma spectrometry was done on soil samples. Five millilitres of venous blood was drawn for cytokinesis-blocked MN assay. Background radiation levels measured by the survey metre; 232Th, 226Ra and 210Pb mass activities in soil were highest in the samples collected from the LMS. The background radiation measurements positively correlated with MN frequency although the magnitude of the correlation was small (r = 0.176, p = 0.04). This implies that chronic long-term exposure to low-dose radiation may result in genotoxicity. Prospective large-scale studies are recommended to evaluate the long-term effect of exposure to low-dose radiation at Pulmoddai.

          Related collections

          Most cited references33

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Natural Radioactivity of Australian Building Materials, Industrial Wastes and By-products

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Risk of cataract after exposure to low doses of ionizing radiation: a 20-year prospective cohort study among US radiologic technologists.

            The study aim was to determine the risk of cataract among radiologic technologists with respect to occupational and nonoccupational exposures to ionizing radiation and to personal characteristics. A prospective cohort of 35,705 cataract-free US radiologic technologists aged 24-44 years was followed for nearly 20 years (1983-2004) by using two follow-up questionnaires. During the study period, 2,382 cataracts and 647 cataract extractions were reported. Cigarette smoking for >or=5 pack-years; body mass index of >or=25 kg/m(2); and history of diabetes, hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, or arthritis at baseline were significantly (p or=3 x-rays to the face/neck was associated with a hazard ratio of cataract of 1.25 (95% confidence interval: 1.06, 1.47). For workers in the highest category (mean, 60 mGy) versus lowest category (mean, 5 mGy) of occupational dose to the lens of the eye, the adjusted hazard ratio of cataract was 1.18 (95% confidence interval: 0.99, 1.40). Findings challenge the National Council on Radiation Protection and International Commission on Radiological Protection assumptions that the lowest cumulative ionizing radiation dose to the lens of the eye that can produce a progressive cataract is approximately 2 Gy, and they support the hypothesis that the lowest cataractogenic dose in humans is substantially less than previously thought.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Cancer Mortality Among People Living in Areas With Various Levels of Natural Background Radiation

              There are many places on the earth, where natural background radiation exposures are elevated significantly above about 2.5 mSv/year. The studies of health effects on populations living in such places are crucially important for understanding the impact of low doses of ionizing radiation. This article critically reviews some recent representative literature that addresses the likelihood of radiation-induced cancer and early childhood death in regions with high natural background radiation. The comparative and Bayesian analysis of the published data shows that the linear no-threshold hypothesis does not likely explain the results of these recent studies, whereas they favor the model of threshold or hormesis. Neither cancers nor early childhood deaths positively correlate with dose rates in regions with elevated natural background radiation.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                (View ORCID Profile)
                Journal
                Radiation Protection Dosimetry
                Oxford University Press (OUP)
                0144-8420
                1742-3406
                March 2020
                July 07 2020
                February 24 2020
                March 2020
                July 07 2020
                February 24 2020
                : 189
                : 1
                : 114-126
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Kelaniya, Ragama, Sri Lanka
                [2 ]Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Kelaniya, Ragama, Sri Lanka
                [3 ]Atomic Energy Board, Wellampitiya, Sri Lanka
                [4 ]Faculty of Medicine, Centre for Health Informatics, Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of Kelaniya, Ragama, Sri Lanka
                [5 ]Ministry of Health, Nutrition & Indigenous Medicine, Colombo, Sri Lanka
                [6 ]Department of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Kelaniya, Ragama, Sri Lanka
                Article
                10.1093/rpd/ncaa022
                441df3cf-0fa9-40bd-9d6b-3b8447ec8fb8
                © 2020

                https://academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article