7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Reaching out

      review-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          In the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic, science is crucial to inform public policy. At the same time, mistrust of scientists and misinformation about scientific facts are rampant. Six scientists, actively involved in outreach, reflect on how to build a better understanding and trust of science.

          Abstract

          In the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic, science is crucial to inform public policy. At the same time, mistrust of scientists and misinformation about scientific facts are rampant. Six scientists, actively involved in outreach, reflect on how to build a better understanding and trust of science.

          The contributors

          Katie Mack is a theoretical astrophysicist exploring a range of questions in cosmology, the study of the universe from beginning to end. She is currently an assistant professor of physics at North Carolina State University. Her first popular book, The End of Everything (Astrophysically Speaking), will be out in August. She can be found on Twitter as @AstroKatie.

          Karl Kruszelnicki is a science generalist, with an enthusiastic public following in Australia. He has frontlined in multiple media for decades. He is writing his 46th book and does half a dozen science Q&A radio shows every week. He is a Fellow in the School of Physics at the University of Sydney. He has degrees in maths and physics, biomedical engineering, medicine and surgery. He can be found on Twitter as @doctorkarl.

          Lisa Randall studies theoretical particle physics and cosmology at Harvard University. Her research connects theoretical insights to puzzles in our current understanding of the properties and interactions of matter. Additionally, she engages with the public through her popular science books, articles, lectures, and radio and TV appearances.

          Jess Wade is an excitable scientist with an enthusiasm for equality. By day, she is based in the Department of Chemistry at Imperial College London, where she creates superthin films out of organic electronic materials that emit and absorb circularly polarized light. She spends her evenings editing Wikipedia, working to make the internet less sexist and racist. She can be found on Twitter as @jesswade.

          Jim Al-Khalili, FRS, is a theoretical physicist, author and broadcaster. He holds a Distinguished Chair in physics at the University of Surrey, where he teaches and conducts his research in nuclear physics and open quantum systems. As well as his popular science writing, he is a regular presenter on TV and hosts the long-running BBC Radio 4 programme, The Life Scientific. His latest book, The World According to Physics, is out now. He can be found on Twitter as @jimalkhalili.

          Vlatko Vedral is a professor of physics at Oxford and National University of Singapore working on quantum physics. He has received many awards for his work, including the Royal Society Wolfson Research Merit Award and the World Scientific Medal and Prize, and was elected a Fellow of the Institute of Physics in 2017. He gives regular interviews to the media and has written articles for New Scientist, Scientific American and other major newspapers, as well as two popular science books.

          Related collections

          Most cited references1

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          The Immoral Landscape? Scientists Are Associated with Violations of Morality

          Do people think that scientists are bad people? Although surveys find that science is a highly respected profession, a growing discourse has emerged regarding how science is often judged negatively. We report ten studies (N = 2328) that investigated morality judgments of scientists and compared those with judgments of various control groups, including atheists. A persistent intuitive association between scientists and disturbing immoral conduct emerged for violations of the binding moral foundations, particularly when this pertained to violations of purity. However, there was no association in the context of the individualizing moral foundations related to fairness and care. Other evidence found that scientists were perceived as similar to others in their concerns with the individualizing moral foundations of fairness and care, yet as departing for all of the binding foundations of loyalty, authority, and purity. Furthermore, participants stereotyped scientists particularly as robot-like and lacking emotions, as well as valuing knowledge over morality and being potentially dangerous. The observed intuitive immorality associations are partially due to these explicit stereotypes but do not correlate with any perceived atheism. We conclude that scientists are perceived not as inherently immoral, but as capable of immoral conduct.
            Bookmark

            Author and article information

            Contributors
            kmack@ncsu.edu
            drkarl@sydney.edu.au
            randall@g.harvard.edu
            jessica.wade@imperial.ac.uk
            j.al-khalili@surrey.ac.uk
            vlatko.vedral@physics.ox.ac.uk
            Journal
            Nat Rev Phys
            Nature Reviews Physics
            Nature Publishing Group UK (London )
            2522-5820
            18 May 2020
            : 1-3
            Affiliations
            [1 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2173 6074, GRID grid.40803.3f, Department of Physics, , North Carolina State University, ; Raleigh, NC USA
            [2 ]ISNI 0000 0004 1936 834X, GRID grid.1013.3, School of Physics, , University of Sydney, ; Sydney, Australia
            [3 ]ISNI 000000041936754X, GRID grid.38142.3c, Department of Physics, , Harvard University, ; Cambridge, MA USA
            [4 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2113 8111, GRID grid.7445.2, Department of Chemistry, , Imperial College London, ; London, UK
            [5 ]ISNI 0000 0004 0407 4824, GRID grid.5475.3, Department of Physics, , University of Surrey, ; Guildford, UK
            [6 ]ISNI 0000 0004 1936 8948, GRID grid.4991.5, Department of Physics, , University of Oxford, ; Oxford, UK
            Article
            185
            10.1038/s42254-020-0185-5
            7233191
            4491bde5-d041-40ae-acdb-321d32fcb68a
            © Springer Nature Limited 2020

            This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.

            History
            : 24 April 2020
            Categories
            Viewpoint

            scientific community and society,physics
            scientific community and society, physics

            Comments

            Comment on this article