6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Male honor and female fidelity: Implicit cultural scripts that perpetuate domestic violence.

      ,
      Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
      American Psychological Association (APA)

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Two studies explored how domestic violence may be implicitly or explicitly sanctioned and reinforced in cultures where honor is a salient organizing theme. Three general predictions were supported: (a) female infidelity damages a man's reputation, particularly in honor cultures; (b) this reputation can be partially restored through the use of violence; and (c) women in honor cultures are expected to remain loyal in the face of jealousy-related violence. Study 1 involved participants from Brazil (an honor culture) and the United States responding to written vignettes involving infidelity and violence in response to infidelity. Study 2 involved southern Anglo, Latino, and northern Anglo participants witnessing a "live" incident of aggression against a woman (actually a confederate) and subsequently interacting with her.

          Related collections

          Most cited references28

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Sex Differences in Jealousy: Evolution, Physiology, and Psychology

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              What's wrong with cross-cultural comparisons of subjective Likert scales?: The reference-group effect.

              Social comparison theory maintains that people think about themselves compared with similar others. Those in one culture, then, compare themselves with different others and standards than do those in another culture, thus potentially confounding cross-cultural comparisons. A pilot study and Study 1 demonstrated the problematic nature of this reference-group effect: Whereas cultural experts agreed that East Asians are more collectivistic than North Americans, cross-cultural comparisons of trait and attitude measures failed to reveal such a pattern. Study 2 found that manipulating reference groups enhanced the expected cultural differences, and Study 3 revealed that people from different cultural backgrounds within the same country exhibited larger differences than did people from different countries. Cross-cultural comparisons using subjective Likert scales are compromised because of different reference groups. Possible solutions are discussed.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
                Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
                American Psychological Association (APA)
                1939-1315
                0022-3514
                2003
                2003
                : 84
                : 5
                : 997-1010
                Article
                10.1037/0022-3514.84.5.997
                12757144
                44f7c55d-a7d3-4664-b954-dd1a51ff3478
                © 2003
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article