6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Validation of an abbreviated instrument to assess veterinary client caregiver burden

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Caregiver burden is present in many clients managing illness in a companion animal, but current assessment tools are time‐consuming and lack normative reference values.

          Objectives

          Statistical reduction of items in a measure of caregiver burden to create an abbreviated version, validation of the abbreviated version, and calculation of reference values.

          Animals

          None.

          Methods

          This study was conducted using observational methods. Owners of an ill cat or dog were recruited through social media (n = 429). Veterinary clients with an ill (n = 459) or healthy (n = 961) cat or dog were recruited through a general veterinary and an academic hospital with multiple specialties. The study was conducted in 3 stages: (a) reduction of the Zarit Burden Interview (ZBI) adapted for use in pets via factor and item analyses, (b) psychometric validation of the abbreviated instrument, and (c) standardization of the abbreviated (7 items) and full (18 items) measures.

          Results

          A 7‐item measure showed high correlations with the full measure ( r = 0.88‐0.93) and good internal consistency (α = .71‐.75) across samples of veterinary clients with an ill cat or dog. This abbreviated measure correlated significantly ( P < .001) and positively with stress ( r = 0.40‐0.75) and negatively with quality of life ( r = −0.32 to −0.56). Reference values derived from clients with a healthy companion animal suggest “normal” burden ranges of 0 to 17 on the full measure and 0 to 8 on the abbreviated version.

          Conclusions and Clinical Importance

          For situations precluding full assessment of client caregiver burden, this brief 7‐item version can be used with good internal consistency and validity. Reference values can help determine if a client's caregiver burden is increased.

          Related collections

          Most cited references13

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire: a new measure.

          The Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire (Q-LES-Q) is a self-report measure designed to enable investigators to easily obtain sensitive measures of the degree of enjoyment and satisfaction experienced by subjects in various areas of daily functioning. The summary scores were found to be reliable and valid measures of these dimensions in a group of depressed outpatients. The Q-LES-Q measures were related to, but not redundant with, measures of overall severity of illness or severity of depression within this sample. These findings suggest that the Q-LES-Q measures may be sensitive to important differences among depressed patients that are not detected by the measures usually employed.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            A Two-Step Approach for Transforming Continuous Variables to Normal: Implications and Recommendations for IS Research

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire-short form for quality of life assessments in clinical practice: a psychometric study.

              The Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire (Q-LES-Q) and its short form (Q-LES-Q-SF) are among the most frequently used outcome measures in psychiatry research. The aim of this study was to analyse the measurement properties of the Q-LES-Q-SF for quality of life assessments in the clinical settings. Fifty-seven adults with a psychiatric diagnosis participated. Psychometric evaluation included descriptive analysis, internal consistency, test-retest reliability, validity, sensitivity and responsiveness analysis. The amount of missing data was 5.3%, while no floor or ceiling effects were observed. The internal consistency and test-retest coefficients were 0.9 and 0.93, respectfully. Almost all items significantly correlated to the total score and other measures used in the study, with the correlations ranging 0.41-0.81. Finally, the responsiveness parameters indicated the Q-LES-Q-SF is 80% sensitive and 100% specific measure. This preliminary analysis of the Q-LES-Q-SF demonstrated that it could produce reliable and valid clinical assessments of quality of life.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                mspitzna@kent.edu
                Journal
                J Vet Intern Med
                J. Vet. Intern. Med
                10.1111/(ISSN)1939-1676
                JVIM
                Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine
                John Wiley & Sons, Inc. (Hoboken, USA )
                0891-6640
                1939-1676
                29 April 2019
                May-Jun 2019
                : 33
                : 3 ( doiID: 10.1111/jvim.2019.33.issue-3 )
                : 1251-1259
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Department of Psychological Sciences Kent State University Kent Ohio
                [ 2 ] Department of Clinical Sciences Cummings School of Veterinary Medicine at Tufts University North Grafton Massachusetts
                [ 3 ] Jonathan M. Tisch College of Civic Life at Tufts University Medford Massachusetts
                [ 4 ] Large Animal Medicine, University of Pennsylvania School of Veterinary Medicine Philadelphia Pennsylvania
                [ 5 ] Stow Kent Animal Hospital Kent Ohio
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence

                Mary Beth Spitznagel, Department of Psychological Sciences, Kent State University, Kent Hall, Kent, OH 44242.

                Email: mspitzna@ 123456kent.edu

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4314-1252
                Article
                JVIM15508
                10.1111/jvim.15508
                6524077
                31033026
                45610300-c0f4-47ae-8560-19ba6559fffb
                © 2019 The Authors. Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of the American College of Veterinary Internal Medicine.

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.

                History
                : 11 October 2018
                : 09 April 2019
                Page count
                Figures: 3, Tables: 6, Pages: 9, Words: 6246
                Funding
                Funded by: Tufts Cummings Seed Grant
                Categories
                Standard Article
                SMALL ANIMAL
                Standard Articles
                Caregiving
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                jvim15508
                May/June 2019
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_NLMPMC version:5.6.3 mode:remove_FC converted:17.05.2019

                Veterinary medicine
                caregiver strain,companion animal,measure,reference values
                Veterinary medicine
                caregiver strain, companion animal, measure, reference values

                Comments

                Comment on this article