Cognitive appraisal in fish: stressor predictability modulates the physiological and neurobehavioural stress response in sea bass

Cerqueira, M.; Millot, S; Felix, A.; Silva, T.; Oliveira, G. A.; Oliveira, C. C. V.; Rey, S; Mackenzie, S.; Oliveira, R.

doi:10.1098/rspb.2019.2922

ScienceOpen: research and publishing network

For Publishers

For Researchers

Blog
About

Search
Advanced search

views

recommends

Record: found
Abstract: found
Article: not found

Cognitive appraisal in fish: stressor predictability modulates the physiological and neurobehavioural stress response in sea bass

Author(s): M. Cerqueira ¹ , S. Millot ² , A. Felix ³ , T. Silva ⁴ , G. A. Oliveira ³ ^, ⁵ , C. C. V. Oliveira ¹ , S. Rey ⁶ , S. MacKenzie ⁶ , R. Oliveira ³ ^, ⁵ ^, ⁷

Publication date (Electronic): March 18 2020

Journal: Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

Publisher: The Royal Society

Read this article at

ScienceOpenPublisher PMC

Bookmark

There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

Abstract

The role of cognitive factors in triggering the stress response is well established in humans and mammals (aka cognitive appraisal theory) but very seldom studied in other vertebrate taxa. Predictability is a key factor of the cognitive evaluation of stimuli. In this study, we tested the effects of stressor predictability on behavioral, physiological and neuromolecular responses in the European sea bass ( Dicentrarchus labrax ). Groups of four fish were exposed to a predictable (signalled) or unpredictable (unsignalled) stressor. Stressor predictability elicited a lower behavioural response and reduced cortisol levels. Using the expression of immediate early genes ( c-fos , egr-1 , bdnf and npas4 ) as markers of neuronal activity, we monitored the activity of three sea bass brain regions known to be implicated in stressor appraisal: the dorsomedian telencephalon, Dm (putative homologue of the pallial amygdala); and the dorsal (Dld) and ventral (Dlv) subareas of the dorsolateral telencephalon (putative homologue of the hippocampus). The activity of both the Dm and Dlv significantly responded to stressor predictability, suggesting an evolutionarily conserved role of these two brain regions in information processing related to stressor appraisal. These results indicate that stressor predictability plays a key role in the activation of the stress response in a teleost fish, hence highlighting the role of cognitive processes in fish stress.

Related collections

Most cited references 70

Record: found
Abstract: found
Article: not found

Stress revisited: a critical evaluation of the stress concept.

J M Koolhaas, A Bartolomucci, B Buwalda … (2011)

With the steadily increasing number of publications in the field of stress research it has become evident that the conventional usage of the stress concept bears considerable problems. The use of the term 'stress' to conditions ranging from even the mildest challenging stimulation to severely aversive conditions, is in our view inappropriate. Review of the literature reveals that the physiological 'stress' response to appetitive, rewarding stimuli that are often not considered to be stressors can be as large as the response to negative stimuli. Analysis of the physiological response during exercise supports the view that the magnitude of the neuroendocrine response reflects the metabolic and physiological demands required for behavioural activity. We propose that the term 'stress' should be restricted to conditions where an environmental demand exceeds the natural regulatory capacity of an organism, in particular situations that include unpredictability and uncontrollability. Physiologically, stress seems to be characterized by either the absence of an anticipatory response (unpredictable) or a reduced recovery (uncontrollable) of the neuroendocrine reaction. The consequences of this restricted definition for stress research and the interpretation of results in terms of the adaptive and/or maladaptive nature of the response are discussed. Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

0 comments Cited 385 times – based on 0 reviews      Review now

Bookmark

Record: found
Abstract: not found
Article: not found

Appraisal Theories of Emotion: State of the Art and Future Development

Agnes Moors, Phoebe C Ellsworth, Klaus R. Scherer … (2013)

0 comments Cited 244 times – based on 0 reviews      Review now

Bookmark

Record: found
Abstract: found
Article: not found

The cognitive activation theory of stress.

Holger Ursin, Hege R. Eriksen (2004)

This paper presents a cognitive activation theory of stress (CATS), with a formal system of systematic definitions. The term "stress" is used for four aspects of "stress", stress stimuli, stress experience, the non-specific, general stress response, and experience of the stress response. These four meanings may be measured separately. The stress response is a general alarm in a homeostatic system, producing general and unspecific neurophysiological activation from one level of arousal to more arousal. The stress response occurs whenever there is something missing, for instance a homeostatic imbalance, or a threat to homeostasis and life of the organism. Formally, the alarm occurs when there is a discrepancy between what should be and what is-between the value a variable should have (set value (SV)), and the real value (actual value (AV)) of the same variable. The stress response, therefore, is an essential and necessary physiological response. The unpleasantness of the alarm is no health threat. However, if sustained, the response may lead to illness and disease through established pathophysiological processes ("allostatic load"). The alarm elicits specific behaviors to cope with the situation. The level of alarm depends on expectancy of the outcome of stimuli and the specific responses available for coping. Psychological defense is defined as a distortion of stimulus expectancies. Response outcome expectancies are defined as positive, negative, or none, to the available responses. This offers formal definitions of coping, hopelessness, and helplessness that are easy to operationalize in man and in animals. It is an essential element of CATS that only when coping is defined as positive outcome expectancy does the concept predict relations to health and disease.