54
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
2 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Recommendations from the European Working Group for Value Assessment and Funding Processes in Rare Diseases (ORPH-VAL)

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Rare diseases are an important public health issue with high unmet need. The introduction of the EU Regulation on orphan medicinal products (OMP) has been successful in stimulating investment in the research and development of OMPs. Despite this advancement, patients do not have universal access to these new medicines. There are many factors that affect OMP uptake, but one of the most important is the difficulty of making pricing and reimbursement (P&R) decisions in rare diseases. Until now, there has been little consensus on the most appropriate assessment criteria, perspective or appraisal process. This paper proposes nine principles to help improve the consistency of OMP P&R assessment in Europe and ensure that value assessment, pricing and funding processes reflect the specificities of rare diseases and contribute to both the sustainability of healthcare systems and the sustainability of innovation in this field. These recommendations are the output of the European Working Group for Value Assessment and Funding Processes in Rare Diseases (ORPH-VAL), a collaboration between rare disease experts, patient representatives, academics, health technology assessment (HTA) practitioners, politicians and industry representatives. ORPH-VAL reached its recommendations through careful consideration of existing OMP P&R literature and through a wide consultation with expert stakeholders, including payers, regulators and patients. The principles cover four areas: OMP decision criteria, OMP decision process, OMP sustainable funding systems and European co-ordination. This paper also presents a guide to the core elements of value relevant to OMPs that should be consistently considered in all OMP appraisals. The principles outlined in this paper may be helpful in drawing together an emerging consensus on this topic and identifying areas where consistency in payer approach could be achievable and beneficial. All stakeholders have an obligation to work together to ensure that the promise of OMP’s is realised.

          Electronic supplementary material

          The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13023-017-0601-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

          Related collections

          Most cited references125

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          American Society of Clinical Oncology Statement: A Conceptual Framework to Assess the Value of Cancer Treatment Options.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            A standardised, generic, validated approach to stratify the magnitude of clinical benefit that can be anticipated from anti-cancer therapies: the European Society for Medical Oncology Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale (ESMO-MCBS).

            The value of any new therapeutic strategy or treatment is determined by the magnitude of its clinical benefit balanced against its cost. Evidence for clinical benefit from new treatment options is derived from clinical research, in particular phase III randomised trials, which generate unbiased data regarding the efficacy, benefit and safety of new therapeutic approaches. To date, there is no standard tool for grading the magnitude of clinical benefit of cancer therapies, which may range from trivial (median progression-free survival advantage of only a few weeks) to substantial (improved long-term survival). Indeed, in the absence of a standardised approach for grading the magnitude of clinical benefit, conclusions and recommendations derived from studies are often hotly disputed and very modest incremental advances have often been presented, discussed and promoted as major advances or 'breakthroughs'. Recognising the importance of presenting clear and unbiased statements regarding the magnitude of the clinical benefit from new therapeutic approaches derived from high-quality clinical trials, the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) has developed a validated and reproducible tool to assess the magnitude of clinical benefit for cancer medicines, the ESMO Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale (ESMO-MCBS). This tool uses a rational, structured and consistent approach to derive a relative ranking of the magnitude of clinically meaningful benefit that can be expected from a new anti-cancer treatment. The ESMO-MCBS is an important first step to the critical public policy issue of value in cancer care, helping to frame the appropriate use of limited public and personal resources to deliver cost-effective and affordable cancer care. The ESMO-MCBS will be a dynamic tool and its criteria will be revised on a regular basis.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Why rare diseases are an important medical and social issue.

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                lieven.annemans@ugent.be
                segolene.ayme@inserm.fr
                yann.lecam@eurordis.org
                k.facey@btinternet.com
                penilla.gunther@riksdagen.se
                elena.nicod@unibocconi.it
                reni.michele@hsr.it
                jean-louis.roux@eurordis.org
                m.schlander@dkfz.de
                david.g.taylor@ucl.ac.uk
                carlotomino@gmail.com
                jtorrent@catsalut.cat
                Sheela.Upadhyaya@nice.org.uk
                adam.hutchings@dolon.com
                lledez@celgene.com
                Journal
                Orphanet J Rare Dis
                Orphanet J Rare Dis
                Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
                BioMed Central (London )
                1750-1172
                10 March 2017
                10 March 2017
                2017
                : 12
                : 50
                Affiliations
                [1 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2069 7798, GRID grid.5342.0, Department of Public Health, , Ghent University, ; Ghent, Belgium
                [2 ]ISNI 0000 0004 0620 5939, GRID grid.425274.2, , ICM, CNRS UMR 7225––Inserm U 1127––UPMC-P6 UMR S 1127, ; Paris, France
                [3 ]GRID grid.433753.5, , EURORDIS-Rare Diseases Europe, ; Paris, France
                [4 ]ISNI 0000 0004 1936 7988, GRID grid.4305.2, , University of Edinburgh, ; Edinburgh, Scotland
                [5 ]Swedish Parliament, Stockholm, Sweden
                [6 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2165 6939, GRID grid.7945.f, Centre for Research on Health and Social Care Management (CERGAS), , Bocconi University, ; Milan, Italy
                [7 ]ISNI 0000000417581884, GRID grid.18887.3e, , IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele Scientific Institute, ; Milan, Italy
                [8 ]GRID grid.433753.5, , EURORDIS-Rare Diseases Europe, ; Paris, France
                [9 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2190 4373, GRID grid.7700.0, , Health Economics at the University of Heidelberg, ; Heidelberg, Germany
                [10 ]ISNI 0000 0004 0492 0584, GRID grid.7497.d, , Division of Health Economics at the German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), ; Heidelberg, Germany
                [11 ]Institute for Innovation & Valuation in Health Care, Wiesbaden, Germany
                [12 ]ISNI 0000000121901201, GRID grid.83440.3b, Pharmaceutical and Public Health Policy, , University College London (UCL), ; London, UK
                [13 ]Clinical Research at IRCSS San Raffaele, Rome, Italy
                [14 ]GRID grid.7080.f, Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, , Autonomous University of Barcelona, ; Barcelona, Spain
                [15 ]ISNI 0000 0004 1794 1878, GRID grid.416710.5, , NICE, ; Manchester, UK
                [16 ]Dolon Ltd, London, UK
                [17 ]European government relations and public policy at Celgene, Brussels, Belgium
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1131-5038
                Article
                601
                10.1186/s13023-017-0601-9
                5345269
                28283046
                4635fc92-5bc3-4960-ac4b-e2460e21d398
                © The Author(s). 2017

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 28 September 2016
                : 23 February 2017
                Categories
                Position Statement
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2017

                Infectious disease & Microbiology
                orphan medicinal products,rare diseases,pricing and reimbursement,health technology assessment,value assessment,guidelines

                Comments

                Comment on this article