5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Comparisons of corrected daily integrated erythemal UVR data from the U.S. EPA/UGA network of Brewer spectroradiometers with model and TOMS-inferred data : UVR DATA FROM U.S. EPA/UGA BREWER SPECTRORADIOMETERS

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references10

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Satellite estimation of spectral surface UV irradiance in the presence of tropospheric aerosols: 1. Cloud-free case

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Uncertainty of measurements of spectral solar UV irradiance

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Correcting global solar ultraviolet spectra recorded by a brewer spectroradiometer for its angular response error.

              We present a methodology for correcting the global UV spectral measurements of a Brewer MKIII spectroradiometer for the error introduced by the deviation of the angular response of the instrument from the ideal response. This methodology is applicable also to other Brewer spectroradiometers that are currently in operation. The various stages of the methodology are described in detail, together with the uncertainties involved in each stage. Finally global spectral UV measurements with and without the application of the correction are compared with collocated measurements of another spectroradiometer and with model calculations, demonstrating the efficiency of the method. Depending on wavelength and on the aerosol loading, the cosine correction factors range from 2% to 7%. The uncertainties involved in the calculation of these correction factors were found to be relatively small, ranging from ~0.2% to ~2%.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
                J.-Geophys.-Res.
                American Geophysical Union (AGU)
                01480227
                December 16 2002
                December 16 2002
                December 03 2002
                : 107
                : D23
                : ACL 5-1-ACL 5-10
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Physics and Astronomy, National UV Monitoring Center; University of Georgia; Athens Georgia USA
                [2 ]Institute for Terrestrial and Planetary Atmospheres; State University of New York; Stony Brook New York USA
                Article
                10.1029/2001JD001565
                465953e0-036a-4ff4-87dc-1f6cb7bbfc20
                © 2002

                http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1.1

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article