9
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Multicentre, double-blind, crossover trial to identify the Optimal Pathway for TreatIng neurOpathic paiN in Diabetes Mellitus (OPTION-DM): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          The number of people with diabetes is growing rapidly. Diabetes can cause nerve damage leading to severe pain in the feet, legs and hands, which is known as diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain (DPNP). In the UK, the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) recommends amitriptyline, duloxetine, pregabalin or gabapentin as initial treatment for DPNP. If this is not effective, adding one of the other drugs in combination with the first is recommended. NICE points out that these recommendations are not based on robust evidence. The OPTION-DM randomised controlled trial has been designed to address this evidence deficit, with the aims of determining the most clinically beneficial, cost-effective and tolerated treatment pathway for patients with DPNP.

          Methods/design

          A multicentre, double-blind, centre-stratified, multi-period crossover study with equal allocation to sequences (1:1:1:1:1:1) of treatment pathways. Three hundred and ninety-two participants will be recruited from secondary care DPNP centres in the UK. There are three treatment pathways: amitriptyline supplemented with pregabalin, pregabalin supplemented with amitriptyline and duloxetine supplemented with pregabalin. All participants will receive all three pathways and randomisation will determine the order in which they are received. The primary outcome is the difference between 7-day average 24-h pain scores on an 11-point NRS scale measured during the final follow-up week of the treatment pathway. Secondary outcomes for efficacy, cost-effectiveness, safety, patient-perceived tolerability and subgroup analysis will be measured at week 6 and week 16 of each pathway.

          Discussion

          The study includes direct comparisons of the mainstay treatment for DPNP. This novel study is designed to examine treatment pathways and capture clinically relevant outcomes which will make the results generalisable to current clinical practice. The study will also provide information on health economic outcomes and will include a subgroup study to provide information on whether patient phenotypes predict response to treatment.

          Trial registration

          ISRCTN17545443. Registered on 12 September 2016.

          Electronic supplementary material

          The online version of this article (10.1186/s13063-018-2959-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

          Related collections

          Most cited references19

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Diabetic Neuropathies: A statement by the American Diabetes Association

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Sample sizes for clinical trials with normal data.

            S Julious (2004)
            This article gives an overview of sample size calculations for parallel group and cross-over studies with Normal data. Sample size derivation is given for trials where the objective is to demonstrate: superiority, equivalence, non-inferiority, bioequivalence and estimation to a given precision, for different types I and II errors. It is demonstrated how the different trial objectives influence the null and alternative hypotheses of the trials and how these hypotheses influence the calculations. Sample size tables for the different types of trials and worked examples are given. Copyright 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Morphine, gabapentin, or their combination for neuropathic pain.

              The available drugs to treat neuropathic pain have incomplete efficacy and dose-limiting adverse effects. We compared the efficacy of a combination of gabapentin and morphine with that of each as a single agent in patients with painful diabetic neuropathy or postherpetic neuralgia. In this randomized, double-blind, active placebo-controlled, four-period crossover trial, patients received daily active placebo (lorazepam), sustained-release morphine, gabapentin, and a combination of gabapentin and morphine--each given orally for five weeks. The primary outcome measure was mean daily pain intensity in patients receiving a maximal tolerated dose; secondary outcomes included pain (rated according to the Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire), adverse effects, maximal tolerated doses, mood, and quality of life. Of 57 patients who underwent randomization (35 with diabetic neuropathy and 22 with postherpetic neuralgia), 41 completed the trial. Mean daily pain (on a scale from 0 to 10, with higher numbers indicating more severe pain) at a maximal tolerated dose of the study drug was as follows: 5.72 at baseline, 4.49 with placebo, 4.15 with gabapentin, 3.70 with morphine, and 3.06 with the gabapentin-morphine combination (P<0.05 for the combination vs. placebo, gabapentin, and morphine). Total scores on the Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (on a scale from 0 to 45, with higher numbers indicating more severe pain) at a maximal tolerated dose were 14.4 with placebo, 10.7 with gabapentin, 10.7 with morphine, and 7.5 with the gabapentin-morphine combination (P<0.05 for the combination vs. placebo, gabapentin, and morphine). The maximal tolerated doses of morphine and gabapentin were lower (P<0.05) with the combination than for each drug as single agent. At the maximal tolerated dose, the gabapentin-morphine combination resulted in a higher frequency of constipation than gabapentin alone (P<0.05) and a higher frequency of dry mouth than morphine alone (P<0.05). Gabapentin and morphine combined achieved better analgesia at lower doses of each drug than either as a single agent, with constipation, sedation, and dry mouth as the most frequent adverse effects. Copyright 2005 Massachusetts Medical Society.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                d.selvarajah@sheffield.ac.uk
                j.petrie@sheffield.ac.uk
                d.a.white@sheffield.ac.uk
                s.a.julious@sheffield.ac.uk
                bortolami@gmail.com
                c.l.cooper@sheffield.ac.uk
                m.bradburn@sheffield.ac.uk
                a.loban@sheffield.ac.uk
                helen.bowler@sth.nhs.uk
                e.a.swaby@sheffield.ac.uk
                k.sutherland@sheffield.ac.uk
                solomon.tesfaye@sth.nhs.uk
                Journal
                Trials
                Trials
                Trials
                BioMed Central (London )
                1745-6215
                22 October 2018
                22 October 2018
                2018
                : 19
                : 578
                Affiliations
                [1 ]ISNI 0000 0004 1936 9262, GRID grid.11835.3e, Department of Oncology and Human Metabolism, Medical School, , University of Sheffield, ; Sheffield, UK
                [2 ]ISNI 0000 0004 1936 9262, GRID grid.11835.3e, Clinical Trials Research Unit, , University of Sheffield, ; Sheffield, UK
                [3 ]ISNI 0000 0004 1936 9262, GRID grid.11835.3e, Medical Statistics Group, School of Health and Related Research, , University of Sheffield, ; Sheffield, UK
                [4 ]ISNI 0000 0000 9422 8284, GRID grid.31410.37, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, ; Sheffield, UK
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6150-6724
                Article
                2959
                10.1186/s13063-018-2959-y
                6196556
                30348206
                46d5cbe8-377d-41da-8960-17e1d6ca5744
                © The Author(s). 2018

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 20 March 2018
                : 3 October 2018
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000664, Health Technology Assessment Programme;
                Award ID: 15/13/03
                Award Recipient :
                Categories
                Study Protocol
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2018

                Medicine
                diabetes,painful diabetic neuropathy,pregabalin,duloxetine,amitriptyline,crossover trial
                Medicine
                diabetes, painful diabetic neuropathy, pregabalin, duloxetine, amitriptyline, crossover trial

                Comments

                Comment on this article