24
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Augmenting the Efficacy of Immunotoxins and Other Targeted Protein Toxins by Endosomal Escape Enhancers

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The toxic moiety of almost all protein-based targeted toxins must enter the cytosol of the target cell to mediate its fatal effect. Although more than 500 targeted toxins have been investigated in the past decades, no antibody-targeted protein toxin has been approved for tumor therapeutic applications by the authorities to date. Missing efficacy can be attributed in many cases to insufficient endosomal escape and therefore subsequent lysosomal degradation of the endocytosed toxins. To overcome this drawback, many strategies have been described to weaken the membrane integrity of endosomes. This comprises the use of lysosomotropic amines, carboxylic ionophores, calcium channel antagonists, various cell-penetrating peptides of viral, bacterial, plant, animal, human and synthetic origin, other organic molecules and light-induced techniques. Although the efficacy of the targeted toxins was typically augmented in cell culture hundred or thousand fold, in exceptional cases more than million fold, the combination of several substances harbors new problems including additional side effects, loss of target specificity, difficulties to determine the therapeutic window and cell type-dependent variations. This review critically scrutinizes the chances and challenges of endosomal escape enhancers and their potential role in future developments.

          Related collections

          Most cited references157

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Fusion of Enveloped Viruses in Endosomes

          To initiate infection, enveloped viruses must fuse with a cell membrane, a process mediated by a dedicated viral fusion protein. To date, these proteins group into three basic structural classes. Most require priming (via a protease) to prepare them to respond to a fusion‐triggering signal. Known fusion triggers include receptors, low pH and proteases (and combinations thereof). Here, we provide an update on viral fusion protein priming and triggering, with a focus on virus fusion in endosomes.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Current status of polymeric gene delivery systems.

            Gene therapy provides great opportunities for treating diseases from genetic disorders, infections and cancer. To achieve successful gene therapy, development of proper gene delivery systems could be one of the most important factors. Several non-viral gene transfer methods have been developed to overcome the safety problems of their viral counterpart. Polymer-based non-viral gene carriers have been used due to their merits in safety including the avoidance of potential immunogenecity and toxicity, the possibility of repeated administration, and the ease of the establishment of good manufacturing practice (GMP). A wide range of polymeric vectors have been utilized to deliver therapeutic genes in vivo. The modification of polymeric vectors has also shown successful improvements in achieving target-specific delivery and in promoting intracellular gene transfer efficiency. Various systemic and cellular barriers, including serum proteins in blood stream, cell membrane, endosomal compartment and nuclear membrane, were successfully circumvented by designing polymer carriers having a smart molecular structure. This review explores the recent development of polymeric gene carriers and presents the future directions for the application of the polymer-based gene delivery systems in gene therapy.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Cell internalization of the third helix of the Antennapedia homeodomain is receptor-independent.

              We have recently reported that a 16-amino acid long polypeptide corresponding to the third helix of the DNA binding domain (homeodomain) of Antennapedia, a Drosophila transcription factor, is internalized by cells in culture (Derossi, D., Joliot, A. H., Chassaing, G., and Prochiantz, A.(1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 10444-10450). The capture of the homeodomain and of its third helix at temperatures below 10 degrees C raised the problem of the mechanism of internalization. The present demonstration, that a reverse helix and a helix composed of D-enantiomers still translocate across biological membranes at 4 and 37 degrees C strongly suggests that the third helix of the homeodomain is internalized by a receptor-independent mechanism. The finding that introducing 1 or 3 prolines in the structure does not hamper internalization also demonstrates that the alpha-helical structure is not necessary. The data presented are compatible with a translocation process based on the establishment of direct interactions with the membrane phospholipids. The third helix of the homeodomain has been used successfully to address biologically active substances to the cytoplasm and nucleus of cells in culture (Théodore, L., Derossi, D., Chassaing, G., Llirbat, B., Kubes, M., Jordan, P., Chneiweiss, H., Godement, P., and Prochiantz, A.(1995) J. Neurosci. 15, 7158-7167). Therefore, in addition to their physiological implications (Prochiantz, A., and Théodore, L.(1995) BioEssays 17, 39-45), the present results open the way to the molecular design of cellular vectors.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Academic Editor
                Role: Academic Editor
                Journal
                Toxins (Basel)
                Toxins (Basel)
                toxins
                Toxins
                MDPI
                2072-6651
                01 July 2016
                July 2016
                : 8
                : 7
                : 200
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Institut für Laboratoriumsmedizin, Klinische Chemie und Pathobiochemie, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, 13353 Berlin, Germany
                [2 ]Institut für Pharmazie, Freie Universität Berlin, 14195 Berlin, Germany; weng@ 123456zedat.fu-berlin.de
                [3 ]Department of Experimental Therapeutics, BC Cancer Research Centre, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1L3, Canada; rgilabertoriol@ 123456bccrc.ca
                Author notes
                [* ]Correspondence: hendrik.fuchs@ 123456charite.de ; Tel.: +49-30-450-569173
                Article
                toxins-08-00200
                10.3390/toxins8070200
                4963833
                27376327
                4808b58d-846c-4a55-b0f7-4d071969e676
                © 2016 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.

                This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 21 April 2016
                : 17 June 2016
                Categories
                Review

                Molecular medicine
                endosomal escape,efficacy enhancers,targeted toxins,immunotoxins,cytosolic drug delivery,controlled drug release,cancer treatment,endocytosis

                Comments

                Comment on this article