7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
2 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found

      An adaptive blended learning model for the implementation of an integrated medical neuroscience course during the Covid‐19 pandemic

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The implementation of an integrated medical neuroscience course by technologically pivoting an in‐person neuroscience course to online using an adaptive blended method may provide a unique approach for teaching a medical neuroscience course during the Covid‐19 pandemic. An adaptive blended learning method was developed in response to the requirements necessitated by the Covid‐19 pandemic. This model combined pedagogical needs with digital technology using online learning activities to implement student learning in a medical neuroscience course for year one medical students. This approach provided medical students with an individually customized learning opportunity in medical neuroscience. The students had the complete choice to engage the learning system synchronously or asynchronously and learn neuroscience materials at different locations and times in response to the demands required to deal with the pandemic. Students’ performance in summative and formative examinations of the adaptive blended learning activities were compared with the previous performance obtained the previous year when the contents of the medical neuroscience course were implemented using the conventional “face‐to‐face” learning approach. While the

          cohort of our students in 2019 and 2020 changed, the contents, sessions, volume of material and assessment were constant. This enabled us to compare the results of the 2019 and 2020 classes. Overall, students’ performance was not significantly different between the adaptive blended learning and the in‐person approach. More students scored between 70‐79% during the adaptive blended learning compared with in‐class teaching, while more students scored between 80‐89% during the in‐person learning than during the adaptive blended learning. Finally, the percentage of students that scored >90% was not significantly different for both Years 2019 and 2020. The adaptive blended learning approach was effective in enhancing academic performance for high performing medical students. It also permitted the early identification of underachieving students, thereby serving as an early warning sign to permit timely intervention.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Contributors
          nathanit@greenvillemed.sc.edu
          Journal
          Anat Sci Educ
          Anat Sci Educ
          10.1002/(ISSN)1935-9780
          ASE
          Anatomical Sciences Education
          John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
          1935-9772
          1935-9780
          29 April 2021
          : 10.1002/ase.2097
          Affiliations
          [ 1 ] Department of Biomedical Sciences School of Medicine Greenville University of South Carolina Greenville
          Author notes
          [*] [* ] Correspondence

          Dr. Thomas I Nathaniel, Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of South Carolina, School of Medicine Greenville, Greenville, SC 29605, USA.

          Email: nathanit@ 123456greenvillemed.sc.edu

          Article
          ASE2097
          10.1002/ase.2097
          8239699
          33915035
          48822472-24dc-405e-8a16-8c1d253663b6
          This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

          This article is being made freely available through PubMed Central as part of the COVID-19 public health emergency response. It can be used for unrestricted research re-use and analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source, for the duration of the public health emergency.

          History
          Page count
          Figures: 0, Tables: 0, Pages: 48, Words: 498
          Categories
          Research Report
          Research Report
          Custom metadata
          2.0
          accepted-manuscript
          Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:6.0.2 mode:remove_FC converted:29.06.2021

          neuroscience education,neuroanatomy education,medical education,adaptive blended learning,covid‐19,pedagogy,face‐to‐face learning,brick‐and‐mortar,integration

          Comments

          Comment on this article