5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Double Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography in Preoperative T Staging of Gastric Cancer: A Comparison With Endoscopic Ultrasonography

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective: To compare the precision of double contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (DCEUS) to endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) in preoperative T staging of gastric cancers.

          Methods: This retrospective study consisted of 158 pathologically confirmed gastric cancer patients. All patients underwent DCEUS (intravenous contrast-enhanced ultrasonography combined with oral contrast-enhanced ultrasonography) and endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) preoperatively. The histopathological findings of resected specimens were compared with the results of DCEUS and EUS retrospectively.

          Results: The accuracy of DCEUS and EUS in evaluating the T staging of gastric cancer were 82.3% (T1 62.5%,T2 84.4%,T3 87.9%,T4 91.3%) and 76.6% (T1 84.4%,T2 82.2%,T3 72.4%,T4 65.2%), respectively. There were no significant differences between the methods for the overall T staging accuracy (χ 2 = 1.569, P = 0.210). But EUS was superior to DCEUS for T1 stage (χ 2 = 3.925, P = 0.048) and DCEUS was superior to EUS for T3 stage (χ 2 = 4.393, P = 0.036) and T4 stage (χ 2 = 4.600, P = 0.032).

          Conclusion: DCEUS is a convenient and noninvasive method with high precision, which can be used as the primary imaging technique for advanced gastric cancer T staging. In early gastric cancer, we should prefer EUS. Two methods are complementary for assessing tumor invasion depth of gastric cancer.

          Related collections

          Most cited references32

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Gastric cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) for the preoperative locoregional staging of primary gastric cancer.

            Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) is proposed as an accurate diagnostic device for the locoregional staging of gastric cancer, which is crucial to developing a correct therapeutic strategy and ultimately to providing patients with the best chance of cure. However, despite a number of studies addressing this issue, there is no consensus on the role of EUS in routine clinical practice.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              A systematic review and meta-analysis of the utility of EUS for preoperative staging for gastric cancer.

              Accurate preoperative staging is important in determining the appropriate treatment of gastric cancer. Recently, endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) has been introduced as a staging modality. However, reported test characteristics for EUS in gastric cancer vary. Our purpose in this study was to identify, synthesize, and evaluate findings from all articles on the performance of EUS in the preoperative staging of gastric cancer. Electronic literature searches were conducted using Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from 1 January 1998 to 1 December 2009. All search titles and abstracts were independently rated for relevance by a minimum of two reviewers. Meta-analysis for the performance of EUS was analyzed by calculating agreement (Kappa statistic), and pooled estimates of accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity for all EUS examinations, using histopathology as the reference standard. Subgroup analyses were also performed. Twenty-two articles met our inclusion criteria and were included in the review. EUS pooled accuracy for T staging was 75% with a moderate Kappa (0.52). EUS was most accurate for T3 disease, followed by T4, T1, and T2. EUS pooled accuracy for N staging was 64%, sensitivity was 74%, and specificity was 80%. There was significant heterogeneity between the included studies. Subgroup analyses found that annual EUS volume was not associated with EUS T and N staging accuracy (P = 0.836, 0.99, respectively). EUS is a moderately accurate technique that seems to describe advanced T stage (T3 and T4) better than N or less advanced T stage. Stratifying by EUS annual volume did not affect EUS performance in staging gastric cancer.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Oncol
                Front Oncol
                Front. Oncol.
                Frontiers in Oncology
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                2234-943X
                12 February 2019
                2019
                : 9
                : 66
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Department of Ultrasound, The Second Affiliated Hospital and Yuying Children's Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University , Wenzhou, China
                [2] 2Wenzhou Institute of Biomaterials and Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences , Wenzhou, China
                [3] 3Department of Gastroenterology, The Second Affiliated Hospital and Yuying Children's Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University , Wenzhou, China
                [4] 4Department of Pathology, The Second Affiliated Hospital and Yuying Children's Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University , Wenzhou, China
                Author notes

                Edited by: Cicero Matthew R. Habito, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, United States

                Reviewed by: Angelo Don II Santos Grasparil, Cardinal MRI Center, Inc., Philippines; Laurence Gluch, The Strathfield Breast Centre, Australia

                *Correspondence: Yan Yang yang25yan1997@ 123456163.com

                This article was submitted to Cancer Imaging and Image-directed Interventions, a section of the journal Frontiers in Oncology

                Article
                10.3389/fonc.2019.00066
                6380108
                30809510
                49151df6-0053-457e-b992-440062d6d5d3
                Copyright © 2019 Wang, Liu, Kou, He, Zheng, Zhou and Yang.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 03 May 2018
                : 24 January 2019
                Page count
                Figures: 6, Tables: 3, Equations: 0, References: 36, Pages: 8, Words: 4698
                Categories
                Oncology
                Original Research

                Oncology & Radiotherapy
                ultrasonography,endoscopic ultrasonography,gastric cancer,surgery,histopathology

                Comments

                Comment on this article