73
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The Trophy Hunting of African Lions: Scale, Current Management Practices and Factors Undermining Sustainability

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The trophy hunting of lions Panthera leo is contentious due to uncertainty concerning conservation impacts and because of highly polarised opinions about the practice. African lions are hunted across at least ∼558,000 km 2, which comprises 27–32% of the lion range in countries where trophy hunting of the species is permitted. Consequently, trophy hunting has potential to impart significant positive or negative impacts on lions. Several studies have demonstrated that excessive trophy harvests have driven lion population declines. There have been several attempts by protectionist non-governmental organisations to reduce or preclude trophy hunting via restrictions on the import and export of lion trophies. We document the management of lion hunting in Africa and highlight challenges which need addressing to achieve sustainability. Problems include: unscientific bases for quota setting; excessive quotas and off-takes in some countries; fixed quotas which encourage over-harvest; and lack of restrictions on the age of lions that can be hunted. Key interventions needed to make lion hunting more sustainable, include implementation of: enforced age restrictions; improved trophy monitoring; adaptive management of quotas and a minimum length of lion hunts of at least 21 days. Some range states have made important steps towards implementing such improved management and off-takes have fallen steeply in recent years. For example age restrictions have been introduced in Tanzania and in Niassa in Mozambique, and are being considered for Benin and Zimbabwe, several states have reduced quotas, and Zimbabwe is implementing trophy monitoring. However, further reforms are needed to ensure sustainability and reduce conservation problems associated with the practice while allowing retention of associated financial incentives for conservation.

          Related collections

          Most cited references24

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          The impact of sport-hunting on the population dynamics of an African lion population in a protected area

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Why Lions Form Groups: Food is Not Enough

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Economic and conservation significance of the trophy hunting industry in sub-Saharan Africa

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS One
                PLoS ONE
                plos
                plosone
                PLoS ONE
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, USA )
                1932-6203
                2013
                18 September 2013
                : 8
                : 9
                : e73808
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Lion Program, Panthera, New York, United States of America
                [2 ]Mammal Research Institute, Department of Zoology and Entomology, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, Gauteng, South Africa
                [3 ]Department of Biological Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, Western Cape, South Africa
                [4 ]Zimbabwe Parks and Wildlife Management Authority, Harare, Mashonaland East, Zimbabwe
                [5 ]Zambia Wildlife Authority, Chilanga, Lusaka Province, Zambia
                Bangor University, United Kingdom
                Author notes

                Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

                Conceived and designed the experiments: PAL GB NM. Performed the experiments: PAL GB NM. Analyzed the data: PAL GB NM LH HM VN PF. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: PAL GB NM LH HM VN PF. Wrote the paper: PAL GB NM LH HM VN PF.

                Article
                PONE-D-13-17467
                10.1371/journal.pone.0073808
                3776777
                24058491
                49355fac-0ed3-4d6b-95aa-e13a9d2bea44
                Copyright @ 2013

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and re credited.

                History
                : 27 April 2013
                : 25 July 2013
                Page count
                Pages: 11
                Funding
                This research was funded by Panthera. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
                Categories
                Research Article

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article