15
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Identity Expression Through Collective Action: How Identification With a Politicized Group and Its Identity Contents Differently Motivated Identity-Expressive Collective Action in the U.S. 2016 Presidential Elections

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Although political action often requires activists to express who they are and what they stand for, little is known about the motivators of such identity expression. This research investigates how group identity content and identification with this content predict identity-expressive collective action in the U.S. 2016 presidential elections. We recruited a longitudinal community sample of U.S. party supporters ( N = 426) mid-October (T1), beginning November (T2), and mid-November (T3). Participants listed words they associated with party campaigners, and self-reported their identification with this identity content and the politicized group. Supporting H1, politicized group identification longitudinally predicted increased frequency of collective action more strongly than did identification with specific identity content. Supporting H2, identification with specific identity content longitudinally predicted increased desires to express that content through collective action more strongly than politicized group identification. Implications for our understanding of identity expression and identity content in collective action are discussed.

          Related collections

          Most cited references58

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: tests for correlation and regression analyses.

          G*Power is a free power analysis program for a variety of statistical tests. We present extensions and improvements of the version introduced by Faul, Erdfelder, Lang, and Buchner (2007) in the domain of correlation and regression analyses. In the new version, we have added procedures to analyze the power of tests based on (1) single-sample tetrachoric correlations, (2) comparisons of dependent correlations, (3) bivariate linear regression, (4) multiple linear regression based on the random predictor model, (5) logistic regression, and (6) Poisson regression. We describe these new features and provide a brief introduction to their scope and handling.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Toward an integrative social identity model of collective action: a quantitative research synthesis of three socio-psychological perspectives.

            An integrative social identity model of collective action (SIMCA) is developed that incorporates 3 socio-psychological perspectives on collective action. Three meta-analyses synthesized a total of 182 effects of perceived injustice, efficacy, and identity on collective action (corresponding to these socio-psychological perspectives). Results showed that, in isolation, all 3 predictors had medium-sized (and causal) effects. Moreover, results showed the importance of social identity in predicting collective action by supporting SIMCA's key predictions that (a) affective injustice and politicized identity produced stronger effects than those of non-affective injustice and non-politicized identity; (b) identity predicted collective action against both incidental and structural disadvantages, whereas injustice and efficacy predicted collective action against incidental disadvantages better than against structural disadvantages; (c) all 3 predictors had unique medium-sized effects on collective action when controlling for between-predictor covariance; and (d) identity bridged the injustice and efficacy explanations of collective action. Results also showed more support for SIMCA than for alternative models reflecting previous attempts at theoretical integration. The authors discuss key implications for theory, practice, future research, and further integration of social and psychological perspectives on collective action. PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2008 APA
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Social identity and intergroup behaviour

              H Tajfel (1974)
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Pers Soc Psychol Bull
                Pers Soc Psychol Bull
                PSP
                sppsp
                Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin
                SAGE Publications (Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA )
                0146-1672
                1552-7433
                2 July 2020
                March 2021
                : 47
                : 3
                : 499-513
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Tilburg University, The Netherlands
                [2 ]University of Lausanne, Switzerland
                [3 ]University of Groningen, The Netherlands
                Author notes
                [*]Felicity Turner-Zwinkels, Department of Social Psychology, Tilburg University, Simon building, Prof. Cobbenhagenlaan 225, 5037 DB Tilburg, The Netherlands. Email: f.m.turner@ 123456uvt.nl
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6739-8453
                Article
                10.1177_0146167220933406
                10.1177/0146167220933406
                7897785
                32613897
                4a3235fe-6551-4ca8-abc2-4621a5237b8d
                © 2020 by the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc

                This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page ( https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).

                History
                : 27 September 2018
                : 16 May 2020
                Categories
                Articles
                Custom metadata
                ts1

                identity,identity content,politicized identification,identity expression,collective action

                Comments

                Comment on this article