7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Literature Review of Surgical Treatment in Idiopathic Full-Thickness Macular Hole

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Purpose

          To summarize current surgical techniques for treating primary macular holes (MHs).

          Methods

          We reviewed publications detailing surgical approaches to primary MHs, briefly described their protocols, and outlined their results.

          Results

          Currently, the technique for primary MH repair is pars plana vitrectomy, removing the posterior cortical vitreous, stripping the epiretinal membranes, and ending with intraocular gas tamponade. The evident benefit of peeling off the internal limiting membrane (ILM) was clearly shown for MHs at stages 2 to 4 by achieving an anatomical closure rate of >90%, even in large MH up to 650 µm. Newer MH surgical techniques include modification of ILM flap techniques, placing an autologous scaffolding of tissue within the hole, and cell therapy has shown to increase the closure rate of large and chronic macular holes, resulting in modest functional improvement in complicated MHs.

          Conclusion

          Since the turn of the century, the success rate of modern macular surgery has increased, even for large and chronic MHs. There seems to be no limit to novel concepts in MH surgery, which range from anatomical closure to those proposing natural restoration of visual function via stem cell therapy.

          Related collections

          Most cited references84

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The International Vitreomacular Traction Study Group classification of vitreomacular adhesion, traction, and macular hole.

          The International Vitreomacular Traction Study (IVTS) Group was convened to develop an optical coherence tomography (OCT)-based anatomic classification system for diseases of the vitreomacular interface (VMI).
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique for large macular holes.

            Large macular holes usually have an increased risk of surgical failure. Up to 44% of large macular holes remain open after 1 surgery. Another 19% to 39% of macular holes are flat-open after surgery. Flat-open macular holes are associated with limited visual acuity. This article presents a modification of the standard macular hole surgery to improve functional and anatomic outcomes in patients with large macular holes. A prospective, randomized clinical trial. Patients with macular holes larger than 400 μm were included. In group 1, 51 eyes of 40 patients underwent standard 3-port pars plana vitrectomy with air. In group 2, 50 eyes of 46 patients underwent a modification of the standard technique, called the inverted internal limiting membrane (ILM) flap technique. In the inverted ILM flap technique, instead of completely removing the ILM after trypan blue staining, a remnant attached to the margins of the macular hole was left in place. This ILM remnant was then inverted upside-down to cover the macular hole. Fluid-air exchange was then performed. Spectral optical coherence tomography and clinical examination were performed before surgery and postoperatively at 1 week and 1, 3, 6, and 12 months. Visual acuity and postoperative macular hole closure. Preoperative mean visual acuity was 0.12 in group 1 and 0.078 in group 2. Macular hole closure was observed in 88% of patients in group 1 and in 98% of patients in group 2. A flat-hole roof with bare retinal pigment epithelium (flat-open) was observed in 19% of patients in group 1 and 2% of patients in group 2. Mean (or median) postoperative visual acuity 12 months after surgery was 0.17 (range, 0.1-0.6) in group 1 and 0.28 (range, 0.02-0.8) in group 2 (P = 0.001). The inverted ILM flap technique prevents the postoperative flat-open appearance of a macular hole and improves both the functional and anatomic outcomes of vitrectomy for macular holes with a diameter greater than 400 μm. Spectral optical coherence tomography after vitrectomy with the inverted ILM flap technique suggests improved foveal anatomy compared with the standard surgery. Copyright © 2010 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Vitreous surgery for idiopathic macular holes. Results of a pilot study.

              Idiopathic macular holes are generally considered an untreatable condition. We used modern vitrectomy techniques to evaluate two questions: (1) Is it possible to reattach the retina around the macular hole? (2) If it is reattached, will the patient's central vision improve? In 30 (58%) of 52 patients, we were able to reattach successfully the detached macula with our surgical procedure. In 22 (73%) of the 30 patients in whom the macula was successfully reattached, there was an improvement in visual acuity of two lines or better. In the 22 patients in whom reattachment of the macular hole was not obtained, there was no significant improvement in visual acuity. Thus, the overall success rate for improved vision postoperatively was 42% (22/52). Complications related to surgery were observed in eight patients (15%) early in our experience with this procedure and included increase in the size of the macular hole, mottling of the retinal pigmented epithelium, and a vascular occlusion. Our clinical observations indicate that the treatment of macular holes by vitrectomy may offer some promise for this otherwise untreatable condition. In patients in whom reattachment was successful, the technique used appeared to allow for clinically significant improvements in visual acuity. However, additional work on increasing surgical success and minimizing surgical complications, as well as a further understanding of the mechanism of retinal reattachment, is required before widespread use of this procedure for treating macular holes.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Clin Ophthalmol
                Clin Ophthalmol
                opth
                clinop
                Clinical Ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)
                Dove
                1177-5467
                1177-5483
                30 July 2020
                2020
                : 14
                : 2171-2183
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Surin Hospital and Surin Medical Education Center, Department of Ophthalmology, Suranaree University of Technology , Surin, Thailand
                [2 ]Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University and King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Thai Red Cross Society , Bangkok, Thailand
                [3 ]Vitreoretinal Research Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University , Bangkok, Thailand
                [4 ]Glaucoma Research Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University , Bangkok, Thailand
                Author notes
                Correspondence: Pear Pongsachareonnont Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine1873 Rama IV Road, Patumwan, Bangkok10330, ThailandTel +66-2256-4142Fax +66-2-252-8290 Email pear.p@chulahospital.org
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8177-1234
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8996-2868
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2074-1629
                Article
                262877
                10.2147/OPTH.S262877
                7398756
                32801628
                4ab7809d-1b1d-4ee7-8433-bf10afc97765
                © 2020 Ittarat et al.

                This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms ( https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).

                History
                : 15 May 2020
                : 13 July 2020
                Page count
                Figures: 2, Tables: 8, References: 86, Pages: 13
                Categories
                Review

                Ophthalmology & Optometry
                macular hole,macular hole surgery,stem cell therapy,internal limiting membrane peeling

                Comments

                Comment on this article