Inviting an author to review:
Find an author and click ‘Invite to review selected article’ near their name.
Search for authorsSearch for similar articles
1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Epithelial Regeneration After Doxorubicin Arises Primarily From Early Progeny of Active Intestinal Stem Cells

      research-article
      1 , 2 , 3 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 6 , 7 , 1 ,
      Cellular and Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology
      Elsevier
      Gastrointestinal, irradiation, LGR5, DNA damage response, aISC, active intestinal stem cell, BrdU, 5-bromo-2’-deoxyuridine, CASP3, cleaved caspase-3, DDR, DNA damage response, DMEM, Dulbecco’s modified Eagle medium, DXR, doxorubicin, FACS, fluorescent-activated cell sorting, FBS, fetal bovine serum, GFP, green fluorescent protein, HR, homologous recombination, IP, intraperitoneal, IR, irradiation, PBS, phosphate-buffered saline, qRT-PCR, quantitative reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction, TA, transit amplifying, TAM, tamoxifen, TBI, total body irradiation

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background & Aims

          aISCs (aISCs) are sensitive to acute insults including chemotherapy and irradiation. Regeneration after aISC depletion has primarily been explored in irradiation (IR). However, the cellular origin of epithelial regeneration after doxorubicin (DXR), a common chemotherapeutic, is poorly understood.

          Methods

          We monitored DXR’s effect on aISCs by enumerating Lgr5-eGFP + and Olfm4 + crypts, cleaved caspase-3 (CASP3 +) immunofluorescence, and time-lapse organoid imaging. Lineage tracing from previously identified regenerative cell populations ( Bmi1 + , Hopx + , Dll1 + , and Defa6 + ) was performed with DXR damage. Lineage tracing from aISCs was compared with lineage tracing from early progeny cells (transit-amplifying cells arising from aISCs 1 day predamage) in the context of DXR and IR. We compared stem cell and DNA damage response (DDR) transcripts in isolated aISCs and early progeny cells 6 and 24 hours after DXR.

          Results

          Epithelial regeneration after DXR primarily arose from early progeny cells generated by aISCs. Early progeny cells upregulated stem cell gene expression and lacked apoptosis induction (6 hours DXR: 2.5% of CASP3 + cells, p<0.0001). aISCs downregulated stem cell gene expression and underwent rapid apoptosis (6 hours DXR: 63.4% of CASP3 + cells). There was minimal regenerative contribution from Bmi1 + , Hopx + , Dll1 + , and Defa6 + -expressing populations. In homeostasis, 48.4% of early progeny cells were BrdU +, and expressed low levels of DDR transcripts.

          Conclusions

          We show that DXR effectively depleted aISCs in the small intestine and subsequent epithelial regeneration depended on nonquiescent early progeny cells of aISCs. The chemoresistant phenotype of the early progeny cells may rely on a dampened DDR in contrast to aISCs’ robust DDR, which facilitates expeditious apoptosis.

          Graphical abstract

          Related collections

          Most cited references67

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Single Lgr5 stem cells build crypt-villus structures in vitro without a mesenchymal niche.

          The intestinal epithelium is the most rapidly self-renewing tissue in adult mammals. We have recently demonstrated the presence of about six cycling Lgr5(+) stem cells at the bottoms of small-intestinal crypts. Here we describe the establishment of long-term culture conditions under which single crypts undergo multiple crypt fission events, while simultanously generating villus-like epithelial domains in which all differentiated cell types are present. Single sorted Lgr5(+) stem cells can also initiate these cryptvillus organoids. Tracing experiments indicate that the Lgr5(+) stem-cell hierarchy is maintained in organoids. We conclude that intestinal cryptvillus units are self-organizing structures, which can be built from a single stem cell in the absence of a non-epithelial cellular niche.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Identification of stem cells in small intestine and colon by marker gene Lgr5.

            The intestinal epithelium is the most rapidly self-renewing tissue in adult mammals. It is currently believed that four to six crypt stem cells reside at the +4 position immediately above the Paneth cells in the small intestine; colon stem cells remain undefined. Lgr5 (leucine-rich-repeat-containing G-protein-coupled receptor 5, also known as Gpr49) was selected from a panel of intestinal Wnt target genes for its restricted crypt expression. Here, using two knock-in alleles, we reveal exclusive expression of Lgr5 in cycling columnar cells at the crypt base. In addition, Lgr5 was expressed in rare cells in several other tissues. Using an inducible Cre knock-in allele and the Rosa26-lacZ reporter strain, lineage-tracing experiments were performed in adult mice. The Lgr5-positive crypt base columnar cell generated all epithelial lineages over a 60-day period, suggesting that it represents the stem cell of the small intestine and colon. The expression pattern of Lgr5 suggests that it marks stem cells in multiple adult tissues and cancers.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              A reserve stem cell population in small intestine renders Lgr5-positive cells dispensable.

              The small intestine epithelium renews every 2 to 5 days, making it one of the most regenerative mammalian tissues. Genetic inducible fate mapping studies have identified two principal epithelial stem cell pools in this tissue. One pool consists of columnar Lgr5-expressing cells that cycle rapidly and are present predominantly at the crypt base. The other pool consists of Bmi1-expressing cells that largely reside above the crypt base. However, the relative functions of these two pools and their interrelationship are not understood. Here we specifically ablated Lgr5-expressing cells in mice using a human diphtheria toxin receptor (DTR) gene knocked into the Lgr5 locus. We found that complete loss of the Lgr5-expressing cells did not perturb homeostasis of the epithelium, indicating that other cell types can compensate for the elimination of this population. After ablation of Lgr5-expressing cells, progeny production by Bmi1-expressing cells increased, indicating that Bmi1-expressing stem cells compensate for the loss of Lgr5-expressing cells. Indeed, lineage tracing showed that Bmi1-expressing cells gave rise to Lgr5-expressing cells, pointing to a hierarchy of stem cells in the intestinal epithelium. Our results demonstrate that Lgr5-expressing cells are dispensable for normal intestinal homeostasis, and that in the absence of these cells, Bmi1-expressing cells can serve as an alternative stem cell pool. These data provide the first experimental evidence for the interrelationship between these populations. The Bmi1-expressing stem cells may represent both a reserve stem cell pool in case of injury to the small intestine epithelium and a source for replenishment of the Lgr5-expressing cells under non-pathological conditions.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Cell Mol Gastroenterol Hepatol
                Cell Mol Gastroenterol Hepatol
                Cellular and Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology
                Elsevier
                2352-345X
                2021
                08 February 2021
                : 12
                : 1
                : 119-140
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Molecular Biomedical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina
                [2 ]Department of Biological Sciences, College of Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina
                [3 ]Department of Molecular and Integrative Physiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
                [4 ]Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
                [5 ]Department of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
                [6 ]Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
                [7 ]Department of Pathology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
                Author notes
                [] Correspondence Address requests for correspondence to: Christopher M. Dekaney, PhD, 1060 William Moore Drive, Campus Box 8401, Raleigh, North Carolina 27607. cmdekane@ 123456ncsu.edu
                Article
                S2352-345X(21)00021-7
                10.1016/j.jcmgh.2021.01.015
                8082264
                33571711
                4ac2cf32-5b56-4b7e-bfc7-77bdd0acb0d4
                © 2021 The Authors

                This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

                History
                : 16 June 2020
                : 19 January 2021
                Categories
                Original Research

                gastrointestinal,irradiation,lgr5,dna damage response,aisc, active intestinal stem cell,brdu, 5-bromo-2’-deoxyuridine,casp3, cleaved caspase-3,ddr, dna damage response,dmem, dulbecco’s modified eagle medium,dxr, doxorubicin,facs, fluorescent-activated cell sorting,fbs, fetal bovine serum,gfp, green fluorescent protein,hr, homologous recombination,ip, intraperitoneal,ir, irradiation,pbs, phosphate-buffered saline,qrt-pcr, quantitative reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction,ta, transit amplifying,tam, tamoxifen,tbi, total body irradiation

                Comments

                Comment on this article