3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Sordera súbita idiopática: factores pronósticos y resultados del tratamiento de rescate con dexametasona intratimpánica Translated title: Idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss: prognostic factors and outcomes of salvage treatment with intratympanic dexamethasone

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          RESUMEN: Introducción y objetivos: La sordera súbita idiopática se define habitualmente, como una pérdida auditiva superior o igual a 30 dB HL, en 3 o más frecuencias consecutivas, con un tiempo de instauración inferior a 72 horas, de causa desconocida. Siendo actualmente motivo de discusión el efecto de la terapia esteroidea en este síndrome, evaluaremos la eficacia del corticoide intratimpánico (CIT) como tratamiento de rescate. Como objetivo secundario, estudiaremos la influencia de determinados factores considerados de riesgo o pronóstico. Pacientes y métodos: Se comparan los resultados de dos grupos de población con edad y pérdida auditiva similar. El primero, de 99 pacientes, recibió exclusivamente tratamiento sistémico con corticoides. En el segundo de 70, con una sordera súbita idiopática refractaria al tratamiento general, instilamos corticoide intratimpánico. Comparamos las diferencias de umbral medio auditivo en el momento del diagnóstico y a los 3 meses, además del grado general de recuperación. Resultados: La aplicación intratimpánica de 3 dosis de dexametasona (8mg/ml) en la sordera súbita idiopática refractaria, no ha producido, en nuestra población, un cambio significativo respecto al tratamiento sistémico. Analizamos también la influencia de los factores pronósticos seleccionados. Discusión: Desconocemos la eficacia del tratamiento con corticoides en la sordera súbita idiopática. El tipo de lesión y las características del paciente podrían ser decisivos en el pronóstico final y en el resultado terapéutico. Conclusiones: El tratamiento de rescate con CIT, no ha aportado mejoría auditiva significativa en la población estudiada. Los factores con peor pronóstico son: la presencia de síntomas vestibulares, la hipoacusia de grado profundo, la caída audiométrica hacia tonos agudos, el inicio del tratamiento después de 2 semanas y fundamentalmente, la falta de mejoría de al menos 10 dB el 4º día de tratamiento.

          Translated abstract

          SUMMARY: Introduction and objectives: Idiopathic Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss (ISSNHL) is commonly defined as greater than 30 dB of hearing loss in at least 3 audiometric frequencies occurring over 3 days or less, of unknown cause. Since the effect of steroid therapy in this syndrome is currently under discussion, we will evaluate the efficacy of intratympanic corticosteroid (ITC) as rescue treatment. As a secondary objective, we will study the influence of certain factors considered risk or prognostic. Patients and methods: The results of two population groups with similar age and hearing loss are compared. The first of 99 patients received exclusively systemic treatment with corticosteroids. In the second group of 70, with ISSNHL refractory to general treatment, we instilled intratympanic corticosteroids. We compared the differences in mean hearing threshold at diagnosis and at 3 months, as well as the general degree of recovery. Results: Intratympanic application of 3 doses of dexamethasone (8mg/ml) in refractory ISSNHL did not produce, in our population, a significant change with respect to systemic treatment. We also analyzed the influence of selected prognostic factors. Discussion: We do not know the efficacy of corticosteroid treatment in idiopathic sudden deafness. The type of lesion and patient characteristics could be decisive in the final prognosis and therapeutic outcome. Conclusions: Rescue treatment with ITC has not provided significant hearing improvement in the population studied. The factors with the worst prognosis are the presence of vestibular symptoms, profound hearing loss, high-frequency hearing loss in audiometry, the beginning of treatment after 2 weeks and fundamentally, the lack of improvement of at least 10 dB on the 4th day of treatment.

          Related collections

          Most cited references39

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Clinical Practice Guideline: Sudden Hearing Loss (Update)

          Sudden hearing loss is a frightening symptom that often prompts an urgent or emergent visit to a health care provider. It is frequently but not universally accompanied by tinnitus and/or vertigo. Sudden sensorineural hearing loss affects 5 to 27 per 100,000 people annually, with about 66,000 new cases per year in the United States. This guideline update provides evidence-based recommendations for the diagnosis, management, and follow-up of patients who present with sudden hearing loss. It focuses on sudden sensorineural hearing loss in adult patients aged ≥18 years and primarily on those with idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss. Prompt recognition and management of sudden sensorineural hearing loss may improve hearing recovery and patient quality of life. The guideline update is intended for all clinicians who diagnose or manage adult patients who present with sudden hearing loss. The purpose of this guideline update is to provide clinicians with evidence-based recommendations in evaluating patients with sudden hearing loss and sudden sensorineural hearing loss, with particular emphasis on managing idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss. The guideline update group recognized that patients enter the health care system with sudden hearing loss as a nonspecific primary complaint. Therefore, the initial recommendations of this guideline update address distinguishing sensorineural hearing loss from conductive hearing loss at the time of presentation with hearing loss. They also clarify the need to identify rare, nonidiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss to help separate those patients from those with idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss, who are the target population for the therapeutic interventions that make up the bulk of the guideline update. By focusing on opportunities for quality improvement, this guideline should improve diagnostic accuracy, facilitate prompt intervention, decrease variations in management, reduce unnecessary tests and imaging procedures, and improve hearing and rehabilitative outcomes for affected patients. Consistent with the American Academy of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery Foundation’s “Clinical Practice Guideline Development Manual, Third Edition” (Rosenfeld et al. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013;148[1]:S1-S55), the guideline update group was convened with representation from the disciplines of otolaryngology–head and neck surgery, otology, neurotology, family medicine, audiology, emergency medicine, neurology, radiology, advanced practice nursing, and consumer advocacy. A systematic review of the literature was performed, and the prior clinical practice guideline on sudden hearing loss was reviewed in detail. Key Action Statements (KASs) were updated with new literature, and evidence profiles were brought up to the current standard. Research needs identified in the original clinical practice guideline and data addressing them were reviewed. Current research needs were identified and delineated. The guideline update group made strong recommendations for the following: (KAS 1) Clinicians should distinguish sensorineural hearing loss from conductive hearing loss when a patient first presents with sudden hearing loss. (KAS 7) Clinicians should educate patients with sudden sensorineural hearing loss about the natural history of the condition, the benefits and risks of medical interventions, and the limitations of existing evidence regarding efficacy. (KAS 13) Clinicians should counsel patients with sudden sensorineural hearing loss who have residual hearing loss and/or tinnitus about the possible benefits of audiologic rehabilitation and other supportive measures. These strong recommendations were modified from the initial clinical practice guideline for clarity and timing of intervention. The guideline update group made strong recommendations against the following: (KAS 3) Clinicians should not order routine computed tomography of the head in the initial evaluation of a patient with presumptive sudden sensorineural hearing loss. (KAS 5) Clinicians should not obtain routine laboratory tests in patients with sudden sensorineural hearing loss. (KAS 11) Clinicians should not routinely prescribe antivirals, thrombolytics, vasodilators, or vasoactive substances to patients with sudden sensorineural hearing loss. The guideline update group made recommendations for the following: (KAS 2) Clinicians should assess patients with presumptive sudden sensorineural hearing loss through history and physical examination for bilateral sudden hearing loss, recurrent episodes of sudden hearing loss, and/or focal neurologic findings. (KAS 4) In patients with sudden hearing loss, clinicians should obtain, or refer to a clinician who can obtain, audiometry as soon as possible (within 14 days of symptom onset) to confirm the diagnosis of sudden sensorineural hearing loss. (KAS 6) Clinicians should evaluate patients with sudden sensorineural hearing loss for retrocochlear pathology by obtaining magnetic resonance imaging or auditory brainstem response. (KAS 10) Clinicians should offer, or refer to a clinician who can offer, intratympanic steroid therapy when patients have incomplete recovery from sudden sensorineural hearing loss 2 to 6 weeks after onset of symptoms. (KAS 12) Clinicians should obtain follow-up audiometric evaluation for patients with sudden sensorineural hearing loss at the conclusion of treatment and within 6 months of completion of treatment. These recommendations were clarified in terms of timing of intervention and audiometry and method of retrocochlear workup. The guideline update group offered the following KASs as options: (KAS 8) Clinicians may offer corticosteroids as initial therapy to patients with sudden sensorineural hearing loss within 2 weeks of symptom onset. (KAS 9a) Clinicians may offer, or refer to a clinician who can offer, hyperbaric oxygen therapy combined with steroid therapy within 2 weeks of onset of sudden sensorineural hearing loss. (KAS 9b) Clinicians may offer, or refer to a clinician who can offer, hyperbaric oxygen therapy combined with steroid therapy as salvage therapy within 1 month of onset of sudden sensorineural hearing loss. Incorporation of new evidence profiles to include quality improvement opportunities, confidence in the evidence, and differences of opinion Included 10 clinical practice guidelines, 29 new systematic reviews, and 36 new randomized controlled trials Highlights the urgency of evaluation and initiation of treatment, if treatment is offered, by emphasizing the time from symptom occurrence Clarification of terminology by changing potentially unclear statements; use of the term sudden sensorineural hearing loss to mean idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss to emphasize that >90% of sudden sensorineural hearing loss is idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss and to avoid confusion in nomenclature for the reader Changes to the KASs from the original guideline: KAS 1—When a patient first presents with sudden hearing loss, conductive hearing loss should be distinguished from sensorineural. KAS 2—The utility of history and physical examination when assessing for modifying factors is emphasized. KAS 3—The word “routine” is added to clarify that this statement addresses nontargeted head computerized tomography scan that is often ordered in the emergency room setting for patients presenting with sudden hearing loss. It does not refer to targeted scans, such as temporal bone computerized tomography scan, to assess for temporal bone pathology. KAS 4—The importance of audiometric confirmation of hearing status as soon as possible and within 14 days of symptom onset is emphasized. KAS 5—New studies were added to confirm the lack of benefit of nontargeted laboratory testing in sudden sensorineural hearing loss. KAS 6—Audiometric follow-up is excluded as a reasonable workup for retrocochlear pathology. Magnetic resonance imaging, computerized tomography scan if magnetic resonance imaging cannot be done, and, secondarily, auditory brainstem response evaluation are the modalities recommended. A time frame for such testing is not specified, nor is it specified which clinician should be ordering this workup; however, it is implied that it would be the general or subspecialty otolaryngologist. KAS 7—The importance of shared decision making is highlighted, and salient points are emphasized. KAS 8—The option for corticosteroid intervention within 2 weeks of symptom onset is emphasized. KAS 9—Changed to KAS 9A and 9B. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy remains an option but only when combined with steroid therapy for either initial treatment (9A) or salvage therapy (9B). The timing of initial therapy is within 2 weeks of onset, and that of salvage therapy is within 1 month of onset of sudden sensorineural hearing loss. KAS 10—Intratympanic steroid therapy for salvage is recommended within 2 to 6 weeks following onset of sudden sensorineural hearing loss. The time to treatment is defined and emphasized. KAS 11—Antioxidants were removed from the list of interventions that the clinical practice guideline recommends against using. KAS 12—Follow-up audiometry at conclusion of treatment and also within 6 months posttreatment is added. KAS 13—This statement on audiologic rehabilitation includes patients who have residual hearing loss and/or tinnitus who may benefit from treatment. Addition of an algorithm outlining KASs Enhanced emphasis on patient education and shared decision making with tools provided to assist in same
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The efficacy of steroids in the treatment of idiopathic sudden hearing loss. A double-blind clinical study.

            Double-blind studies were conducted for the treatment of idiopathic sudden hearing loss (ISHL) with oral steroids. The condition was defined as not less than a 30-dB loss over three contiguous frequencies in three days or less. Follow-up audiograms were obtained four weeks and three months later. Specific audiologic guidelines for the assessment of hearing recovery were used to ensure objectivity. Steroids had a statistically significant effect on the recovery of hearing in patients with moderate hearing losses. The nature of the hearing loss and its susceptibility to improvement with steroid therapy lend support to the hypothesis that viral cochlitis is the primary cause of ISHL.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              The treatment of idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss.

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                orl
                Revista ORL
                Rev. ORL
                Ediciones Universidad de Salamanca (Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain )
                2444-7986
                March 2023
                : 14
                : 1
                : e29939
                Affiliations
                [2] León orgnameSACYL orgdiv1Hospital Clínico Universitario orgdiv2Servicio de ORL y CCC España
                [4] Valladolid orgnameSACYL orgdiv1Hospital Clínico Universitario orgdiv2Servicio de Bioestadística de la Unidad de Apoyo a la Investigación España
                [1] Valladolid orgnameSACYL orgdiv1Hospital Clínico Universitario orgdiv2Servicio de ORL y CCC España
                [3] Puertollano Ciudad Real orgnameHospital de Santa Bárbara orgdiv1Servicio de ORL y CCC España
                Article
                S2444-79862023000100002 S2444-7986(23)01400100002
                10.14201/orl.29939
                4aed77d0-2886-4af0-8f5d-6daf42bdedeb

                This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

                History
                : 15 July 2022
                : 20 August 2022
                Page count
                Figures: 0, Tables: 0, Equations: 0, References: 40, Pages: 0
                Product

                SciELO Spain

                Categories
                Artículo original

                prognosis,refractory sudden sensorineural hearing loss,salvage treatment,steroid therapy,pure-tone average,intratympanic,sordera súbita idiopática refractaria,tratamiento de rescate,terapia con esteroides,promedio de tonos puros,intratimpánico,pronóstico

                Comments

                Comment on this article