6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Drivers of vaccination preferences to protect a low-value livestock resource: Willingness to pay for Newcastle disease vaccines by smallholder households

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Highlights

          • Willingness to pay signals low income households value Newcastle disease vaccines.

          • Vaccination is valued despite poultry being a relatively low value asset.

          • On-farm income is sufficient to drive willingness to pay (WTP).

          • Prior vaccination increases WTP, implying vaccines are valued as being efficacious.

          Abstract

          Vaccination can be an effective risk management approach to minimize the burden of disease and increase livestock productivity for smallholder households in low income countries. In contrast to vaccination of cattle, a high-value smallholder asset, there is a significant knowledge gap for the drivers of vaccine adoption of smallholder poultry. Newcastle disease virus (NDV) causes high mortality in chickens and is one of the greatest constraints to East African poultry production. To determine preferences and willingness to pay for NDV vaccines by chicken-owning households in Tanzania, we administered a survey with a contingent valuation activity to 535 households across six villages in Arusha, Singida, and Mbeya regions. Given the low current vaccination rate, we tested the null hypothesis that smallholder households do not value NDV vaccines and found overwhelming evidence that smallholders do value NDV vaccines. The willingness to pay (WTP) estimate was 5853 Tanzanian shillings ($2.64) to vaccinate ten chickens given the vaccine was protective for a period of three months. This estimate is about twice the market price reported by households in the study areas suggesting chicken-owning households value and benefit from NDV vaccines, but face other barriers to vaccination. Previous vaccination had the largest positive effect size on WTP suggesting smallholders observe benefits from vaccinating. In contrast to studies of vaccination of higher-cost cattle where off-farm income sources often drive willingness to pay, on-farm income was a driver of WTP for NDV vaccines suggesting different drivers affect protection of low-value livestock assets as compared to high-value assets.

          Related collections

          Most cited references13

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Statistical Efficiency of Double-Bounded Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The roles of livestock in developing countries.

            Livestock play a significant role in rural livelihoods and the economies of developing countries. They are providers of income and employment for producers and others working in, sometimes complex, value chains. They are a crucial asset and safety net for the poor, especially for women and pastoralist groups, and they provide an important source of nourishment for billions of rural and urban households. These socio-economic roles and others are increasing in importance as the sector grows because of increasing human populations, incomes and urbanisation rates. To provide these benefits, the sector uses a significant amount of land, water, biomass and other resources and emits a considerable quantity of greenhouse gases. There is concern on how to manage the sector's growth, so that these benefits can be attained at a lower environmental cost. Livestock and environment interactions in developing countries can be both positive and negative. On the one hand, manures from ruminant systems can be a valuable source of nutrients for smallholder crops, whereas in more industrial systems, or where there are large concentrations of animals, they can pollute water sources. On the other hand, ruminant systems in developing countries can be considered relatively resource-use inefficient. Because of the high yield gaps in most of these production systems, increasing the efficiency of the livestock sector through sustainable intensification practices presents a real opportunity where research and development can contribute to provide more sustainable solutions. In order to achieve this, it is necessary that production systems become market-orientated, better regulated in cases, and socially acceptable so that the right mix of incentives exists for the systems to intensify. Managing the required intensification and the shifts to new value chains is also essential to avoid a potential increase in zoonotic, food-borne and other diseases. New diversification options and improved safety nets will also be essential when intensification is not the primary avenue for developing the livestock sector. These processes will need to be supported by agile and effective public and private institutions.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Livestock vaccinations translate into increased human capital and school attendance by girls

              African pastoralists’ decision to vaccinate cattle generates significant household income, translating into broad societal goals.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Vaccine
                Vaccine
                Vaccine
                Elsevier Science
                0264-410X
                1873-2518
                03 January 2019
                03 January 2019
                : 37
                : 1
                : 11-18
                Affiliations
                [a ]Paul G. Allen School for Global Animal Health, Washington State University, PO Box 647090, Pullman, WA 99164, USA
                [b ]Kenya Medical Research Institute, Kisumu, Kenya
                [c ]Nelson Mandela African Institution of Science and Technology, Arusha, Tanzania
                [d ]School of Economic Sciences, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, USA
                Author notes
                [* ]Corresponding author at: Paul G. Allen School for Global Animal Health, Washington State University, PO Box 647090, Pullman, WA 99164, USA. zoe.campbell@ 123456wsu.edu
                Article
                S0264-410X(18)31583-4
                10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.11.058
                6290109
                30478006
                4bc0fe3f-c400-4ef3-8bec-f89e5726ea93
                © 2018 The Authors

                This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 28 June 2018
                : 23 October 2018
                : 19 November 2018
                Categories
                Article

                Infectious disease & Microbiology
                vaccination decision,contingent valuation,willingness to pay,veterinary vaccines,poultry,food security

                Comments

                Comment on this article