9
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Disparities in PM2.5 air pollution in the United States

      1 , 2 , 3 , 4
      Science
      American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Air pollution at any given time is unequally distributed across locations. Average concentrations of fine particulate matter smaller than 2.5 micrometers in diameter (PM 2.5) have fallen over time. However, we do not know how the spatial distribution of PM 2.5 has evolved. Here, we provide early evidence. We combine 36 years of PM 2.5 concentrations measured over ~8.6 million grid cells with geographic, economic, and demographic data from ~65,000 U.S. census tracts. We show that differences in PM 2.5 between more and less polluted areas declined substantially between 1981 and 2016. However, the most polluted census tracts in 1981 remained the most polluted in 2016. The least polluted census tracts in 1981 remained the least polluted in 2016. The most exposed subpopulations in 1981 remained the most exposed in 2016. Overall, absolute disparities have fallen, but relative disparities persist.

          Related collections

          Most cited references34

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Global estimates of mortality associated with long-term exposure to outdoor fine particulate matter

          Significance Exposure to outdoor concentrations of fine particulate matter is considered a leading global health concern, largely based on estimates of excess deaths using information integrating exposure and risk from several particle sources (outdoor and indoor air pollution and passive/active smoking). Such integration requires strong assumptions about equal toxicity per total inhaled dose. We relax these assumptions to build risk models examining exposure and risk information restricted to cohort studies of outdoor air pollution, now covering much of the global concentration range. Our estimates are severalfold larger than previous calculations, suggesting that outdoor particulate air pollution is an even more important population health risk factor than previously thought.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            On the measurement of inequality

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              The China Syndrome: Local Labor Market Effects of Import Competition in the United States

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Science
                Science
                American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
                0036-8075
                1095-9203
                July 30 2020
                July 31 2020
                July 30 2020
                July 31 2020
                : 369
                : 6503
                : 575-578
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Economics, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
                [2 ]Program on Energy and Sustainable Development, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
                [3 ]Frank Batten School of Leadership and Public Policy, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
                [4 ]U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, DC, USA.
                Article
                10.1126/science.aaz9353
                32732425
                4c28d62c-4132-45e8-8e74-efb4663f2a34
                © 2020

                https://www.sciencemag.org/about/science-licenses-journal-article-reuse

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article